Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Me too , I've got 2c to spend .

Lets just say you have your engine running on boost and for whatever reason you leap off the go pedal . Inlet manifold and exhaust flow drops like a brick and for a very short time the turbos innertia will prevent it from stopping dead . What you now have is an area of higher pressure between the compressor outlet and the throttle plate/s and nowhere for the compressed volume to vent other than back towards the compressor . Rotary compressors are designed to be efficient in one airflow direction so they react badly when you get the reversal happening . Cavitation/hissys call it what you like but the compressor is definately in not happy Jan mode .

Like some others I got to see the the technology change (84-96 era) going from a std engined Skyline DR30RS (FJ20ET) to a similar state R33 GTS25T . Like the RB30ET the FJ had no throttle closed recirculation valve (I'll call it TCRV) and it did make the flutter noise even with its std boost pressure of ~ 7 PSI . The thing I really did notice was the DR30 felt a little strange going from a loaded state ie 1/2 throttle to ALMOST closed , the residual pressure in the system gave a sort of delay to the engine unloading or backing off - unless the throttle was closed . The R33 does none of this and is quite responsive to rapid on/off throttle inputs . Now the load sensing devise is different in these cars the older being gate type AFM and the later Hotwire MAF . Unlike a MAP sensor these both react to mass air flow so are obviously upstream devices . If anything the MAP sensor is the one kept mostly in the dark because it can't see whats happening on the outside of the throttle plates so pressure out here means nothing to it .

When you have a TCRV it becomes the "compressed volumes" escape route but I'd say its critical how its fed back into the system upstream of the compressor housing . A MAF sensor can only react to airflow throught it - so if it gets a sudden pressure rise on the engine side flow through it could slow or even pause . No airflow means no load signal so the ECU probably thinks fuel off and siesta time . I think it would pay to look at how Nissan set out their TCRV systems so that you can copy the positive aspects and avoid the stalling or fuel off antics .

I think the bottom line is later RB powered cars use them so until they create a problem leave it as it is . Even the std one does the hiss thing with non std filters ie pods fitted . If I was going to do anything to mine I'd fit the twinned RB26 ones and call it a day , I believe it comes back to the airflow for power instead of boost for power because extra pressure brings extra dramas IMO .

Almost forgot , later era cars are using higher boost pressure than FJ20ET/RB30ET cars did so the TCRV would have more potential to correct drivability glitches with rapid throttle inputs .

2c gone cheers A .

Nope no regrets . In a car of that weight strut front/semi trailing arm IRS and can't steer straight link steering is a real downer . Just about every aspect of R30's paints you into a corner and FJ20's are very crude electrically speaking . You learn to hate two twin row timing chains and the dizzy type CAS . We won't go into 4 stud hubs and disks that bolt behind them will we ...

I didn't like to hear it at the time but someone here made it clear that the overall technology jump from R30/31 to R32 and later was "a quantam leap" . Very good advice .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...