Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got a Nismo one in my R33 GTSt, but i wouldn't really say it's a "heaps" shorter throw. It did make it notchier but feels more solid...

The throw was only shortened slightly but I like the way it feels now - still makes you feel you're doing something when slamming into the next gear :) So I'm sorta agreeing with Ash's comment/opinion...

I think the Nismo GTR short shift reduces the throw by a lot more compared to the GTSt model...

Comparison of a short shifter gear lever and a standard R33GTST gear lever.

1903Shifter_Comparison_Small.jpg

As you can see in the above comparison, all a short shifter really is just a gearstick with the pivot point moved upwards. This means that you get the same movement of the shift linkage (in the gearbox) for a shorter movement of the gear knob. That has 3 effects;

1. The gear knob moves less (back & forward and side to side) for the gear change. This is not a bad thing as your hand moves a shorter distance from the steering wheel, so you spend less time one hand steering.

2. A higher level of force is required on the gear knob (by your hand) as there is less leverage. This higher level of force can manifest itself in more feeling through your hand/fingers for the gear change. Provided you are not a weakling, there is no real down side to this.

3. If you move the gear knob at the same speed, the gear linkage moves faster, hence tries to change gear faster. This can be a problem, because the synchronisers may not be able to move at this faster speed. Hence you can get crunching as the gear tries to engage before the synchroniser has had time to align the meshing. This is an often quoted problem with short shifters, one that is easily overcome by slightly reducing the speed of movement of the gear knob.

The trick with a short shifter is to know what it does and use it to your advantage. Don’t fall for the fallacy that you can change gear faster with a short shifter, because the truth is you can only ever change gear as fast as the gearbox (synchronisers) will allow.

:D cheers :wub:

Edited by Sydneykid
Ive heard these can damage GTR gearboxes due to the mesh being different to GTST boxes? is that right?.....any first hand experience?

100% BS

Internally an R32/33GTR gearbox is the same as an R33GTST gearbox, other than the take off on the output shaft for the transfer case of course.

:D cheers :wub:

im running a r33 gearbox in my r32. It actually has a std gearshift lever that has been cut and welded.

i cant remember where it had been cut/rewelded, but i dont know if its a shorter shift or not. The gearknob height is shorter though.

If it's been chopped down, then it will seem like a shorter shift. I'd liken that to chopping springs in a car though, bit of a hack job. =-[

If you imagine your gearstick three times as long, the top of it would travel much further... if you reduce it, then you are moving the top a shorter distance, but i'd imagine that it's uncomfortable to have to grab lower down to get it.

And to the above guy with the Nismo shifter... there are two.. one is a "solid shifter", which as you felt, makes shifting feel more direct. It has a 10% shorter throw. Nismo make a "quick shifter" which apparently is 25% less throw.

Thanks, SK, for the background on the mechanics of it!

  • 5 years later...

I really would like to find a proper shorter shifting leaver... It becomes a short shifter in that the length is shorter... I dont want to do a hack cut job... and installing a short shifter stick will reduce the throw, but not the length of the damn leaver....

Bought one off ebay about 4 years ago, to much noise through it from gearbox, so cut the shifter below the solid section and same place below the rubber mounting on the standard one and tig welded to rubber mounted top half onto the short shifter bottom. The noise disappeared and due to the rubber mount I got a bit of give in the shifter which made it feel great.

Only thing I noticed is after a few years of driving with it, 3rd and 5th gear started to get a bit crunchy if changing to fast.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...