Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm planning a rebuild of my spare r32 rb25de motor using an rb26 crank, rods and pistons.

I've never had either of these motors apart so it's unfamiliar territory.

I just had a look at the ACL race bearing applications.

The rb26 mains are different to those listed for the rb25 de/t

Apparently the thrust bearing goes in main bearing position no.6 in the rb25 and no.4 in the rb26.

Is the rb25 block and cradle machined to accept the thrust bearing in both positions to suit either crank?

Should I use rb25 or rb26 bearings?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122295-rb25-with-rb26-internals/
Share on other sites

If you are miss matching main caps you will need to get the block line bored and then have bearings to suit.

I'm planning a rebuild of my spare r32 rb25de motor using an rb26 crank and rods.

I've never had either of these motors apart so it's unfamiliar territory.

I just had a look at the ACL race bearing applications.

The rb26 mains are different to those listed for the rb25 de/t

Apart from the extra oil holes in the rb26 main shells they are 20mm wide compared to 19.12mm wide for the rb25.

The bit I'm less sure about is the flange bearing that has the thrust surface.

Apparently it goes in main bearing position no.6 in the rb25 and no.4 in the rb26.

The flange bearing is 26.95mm wide for the rb25 and 27mm wide for the rb26.

To give the correct crank end float it would seem I need to use rb26 mains or doesn't 0.05mm additional end float matter.

Will rb26 mains fit straight into the rb25 block and can the flange bearing fit in position no.4 to suit the rb26 crank?

I'm using the original rb25 cradle so no swapping.

According to previous searches I've done an rb26 crank will bolt straight into an rb25 block so this shouldn't be a major issue.

I had assumed all rb motors had the thrust bearing in position 4

I hope you can just swap the flanged main bearing from pos. 6 to pos. 4

to suit the rb26 crank.

BezerkR32 Shaun rang me. Said the crank looks great Thanks

just make sure the sides of the cap are machined to accept the thrust bearing.

I'm using the original rb25 cradle so no swapping.

According to previous searches I've done an rb26 crank will bolt straight into an rb25 block so this shouldn't be a major issue.

I had assumed all rb motors had the thrust bearing in position 4

I hope you can just swap the flanged main bearing from pos. 6 to pos. 4

to suit the rb26 crank.

BezerkR32 Shaun rang me. Said the crank looks great Thanks

i have an r33 gtst rb25det with an rb 26 crank and rods in it. the crank drops straight in as do the rods and pistons. i clearanced the oil squirter cut outs in the pistons a touch more as the pistons were coming very close to the squirters when i had venolia pistons, but i dont know about the std rb26 pistons.

The thrust bearing is in number 4 main bearing on the rb25det block, i can only assume that it is in the same spot on the rb25de block.

Apart from the crank, rods, pistons, you will also need the harmonic balancer bolt and washer for the rb26 crank as it has a different thread, the rb25 balancer will also fit onto the rb26 crank.

PM me if you need any other info,

NutR33

i have an r33 gtst rb25det with an rb 26 crank and rods in it. the crank drops straight in as do the rods and pistons. i clearanced the oil squirter cut outs in the pistons a touch more as the pistons were coming very close to the squirters when i had venolia pistons, but i dont know about the std rb26 pistons.

The thrust bearing is in number 4 main bearing on the rb25det block, i can only assume that it is in the same spot on the rb25de block.

Apart from the crank, rods, pistons, you will also need the harmonic balancer bolt and washer for the rb26 crank as it has a different thread, the rb25 balancer will also fit onto the rb26 crank.

PM me if you need any other info,

NutR33

RB26 runs 20mm wide main shells and the RB25 runs 3/4 inch. You should be able to use either with the 26 crank.

i have an r33 gtst rb25det with an rb 26 crank and rods in it. the crank drops straight in as do the rods and pistons. i clearanced the oil squirter cut outs in the pistons a touch more as the pistons were coming very close to the squirters when i had venolia pistons, but i dont know about the std rb26 pistons.

The thrust bearing is in number 4 main bearing on the rb25det block, i can only assume that it is in the same spot on the rb25de block.

Apart from the crank, rods, pistons, you will also need the harmonic balancer bolt and washer for the rb26 crank as it has a different thread, the rb25 balancer will also fit onto the rb26 crank.

PM me if you need any other info,

NutR33

I rechecked the acl site and they list the rb25de/det thrust bearing at pos 7 not at 6 as I thought but as you say it's in pos. 4 so I've got nothing to worry about.

The cranks off getting an oil pump collar fitted so I'll have to check the balancer bolt thread when it comes back.

Is there anything special about the bolt eg. a step or nonstandard thread or could I just get a high tensile bolt from a bolt shop?

The balancer that was on the rb25 only has a three rib PS pulley and I need a four rib pulley for my r32 hicas so I hope the rb20 balancer fits.

the bolt for the rb26 crank is a different thread i believe, i brought a new bolt and washer from nissan

RB26 crankshaft pulley bolt NI-12309-05U00 $7.64

RB26 crankshaft pulley bolt washer NI-12308-05U00 $11.56

both these prices were list price 18 months ago, may have changed slightly.

you will have to try the r32 pulley but my bet is that it will fit as most parts are interchangable.

PS, if you are using the rb26 crank, bolt and washer i strongly surgest that you use the torque setting for the rb26 balancer bolt which is 446 - 466Nm, thats DAM tight, trust me. for that tension you will most likely have to use a special torque wrench, i borrowed a 5ft long one from a truck place and strugled with 2 people to do it up!!!

Have Fun

NutR33

Does using the RB26 internals in the RB25 give you the same displacement as an RB26 ? What sort of compression do you end up with as the RB26 has a smaller dome than the 26 ?

Yes 2568cc as both engines have an 86mm bore.

Sorry which head has the smaller dome/chamber?

As far as I know they have the same volume but I've only been told.

I'll have to check it out for myself. On my "to do" list.

I'm hoping to get a CR of 8.5:1

Anyone care to comment on chamber volume r32 rb25de head vs rb26?

NutR33

How did you hold the crank still to get it that tight?

I waited until the motor was in the car, luckly it was a manual, put it in 4th gear with someone in the car with their foot on the brake.

I quess there would be a tool that would lock the crank in place by holding the flywheel/flex place.

NutR33

Im also interested in buildng up an RB25DE Motor with GTR Crank & rods & some 87mm forged pistons, is there any isses with block height between rb25 & 26? ie: will fitting the gtr crank/rods raise the compression from the pistons coming further up in the bores? does anyone know what thickness head gasket to use to achieve a 9.0 comp ratio? how much more capacity will the 87mm pistons give, is that enough of an increase to call it a 2.7?? or just a "big" 2.6 if that makes any sense.

Cheers.

Edited by Drift_Mulisha
Im also interested in buildng up an RB25DE Motor with GTR Crank & rods & some 87mm forged pistons, is there any isses with block height between rb25 & 26? ie: will fitting the gtr crank/rods raise the compression from the pistons coming further up in the bores? does anyone know what thickness head gasket to use to achieve a 9.0 comp ratio? how much more capacity will the 87mm pistons give, is that enough of an increase to call it a 2.7?? or just a "big" 2.6 if that makes any sense.

Cheers.

Rb26 and RB25 have the same deck height so no problem.

The gudgeon pin is higher in the rb26 piston to accommodate the longer stroke.

Most forged RB26 pistons seem to aim for about 8.5:1 CR the same as stock.

To get 9:1 CR you will need to deck the block to run minimal piston to head clearance (0.75mm) with a thin gasket or get 9:1 pistons made.

The stock RB26 is 2568cc and an 87mm bore gives 2628cc 86.5 mm gives 2598ccRB26

sweet, cheers man. would going to an 87.5mm bore be getting closer to 2.7? & would a 1.5mm oversize bore be considered dangerous? i noticed most rebuilds seem to be +1mm and the most extreme i have seen is +2mm on an australian gtr.

sweet, cheers man. would going to an 87.5mm bore be getting closer to 2.7? & would a 1.5mm oversize bore be considered dangerous? i noticed most rebuilds seem to be +1mm and the most extreme i have seen is +2mm on an australian gtr.

A lot of people say 2mm o/s is risky in the std block especially for big power.

Without working it out I'd say 87.5mm would give you around 2660cc and 88mm almost 2700cc.

There's an 88mm kit on ebay selling as a 2.7L kit.

  • 2 weeks later...
A lot of people say 2mm o/s is risky in the std block especially for big power.

Without working it out I'd say 87.5mm would give you around 2660cc and 88mm almost 2700cc.

There's an 88mm kit on ebay selling as a 2.7L kit.

1) I wouldn't go over 1mm overbore because if you blow your motor and need to overbore the cylinders, there's 1mm of material to spare. An extra mm of diameter is not going to give you noticibly increased power anyways. I would err on the side of safety.

2) As far as swapping RB26 internals into an RB25DET is concerned, what brand of bearings are recommended? Also, shouldn't the machine shop measure the crank and rods and determine what bearing thickness is needed from that?

3) I am installing Tomei valve springs with new HKS cams (256 x 8.8mm) and RB26 rods and pistons. What is a reasonable increase in redline with this setup?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...