Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i had my rb25 rebuilt (with stock parts) a few months back. We didnt change anything on the pfc during the run in stage.

Once i had done 1000km and it was way past the being run in stage my tuner slaped it on the dyno and made a few minor adjustments.

well just get it tuned after you bed the rings :angry:

nice and easy really

Rings wont bed if you wash the bores. Just run it in on the dyno - get them to do a bottom end tune up to 3 or 4 psi of boost and 5000rpm.

Edited by rob82

With the new motor I'm going to run 440cc injectors and z32 afm although these could be fitted after it's initial run in.

Shouldn't I do something to the tune before I even turn the key?

Would it even run with the rb20 tune?

How long does it take to run it in on the dyno?

It sounds expensive at $120+/hr

With the new motor I'm going to run 440cc injectors and z32 afm although these could be fitted after it's initial run in.

Shouldn't I do something to the tune before I even turn the key?

Would it even run with the rb20 tune?

How long does it take to run it in on the dyno?

It sounds expensive at $120+/hr

can't help you with the power fc info, (still trying to sort mine out!!)

but we used to run in 400HP+ 11 sec V8's in less than an hour on the dyno, they can put the engine under high load at moderate rpm's, half a dozen run ups like this is more effective than you driving up a hundred hills in the next month.

after the dyno session the engine is basically run in, from memory, you just need avoid 75% & above RPM range for say 500k's, but this way, the rings are definately bedded & you can 75% flog it straight outa the box.

Prolly a mineral oil (or semi synthetic) for start up & initial dyno work, then full syn after 500k's

Talk to your local dyno guru, he will surely give you the right routine! It's a darn site better than having to do so many rpm for the first 500, then so much for the next 500 & so on.....................................

The problem is i live in a regional center and there is nobody with a dyno locally.

I would have to trailer my car to the goldcoast or brisbane but I don't know who to trust.

Booster, know how you feel brother...................aint even a dyno in the COUNTRY where i live.

i think your biggest problem is going to be loading the FC with RB25 stuff, good luck, i wish i could help.

Could you just factor in a 30% fuelling increase into the pfc and see if it starts and immediately check the afr and trim it accordingly?

No. The PFC uses airflow to calculate fueling anyway, if you're running a larger engine it will inject more fuel. However it will probably run rich as shit because on an RB20 pulling that much air at those revs would be very high load, so you will wash your bores down. Adding 30% more fuel will make the problem worse.

You've just spent a few grand rebuilding an engine, spend a few hundred bucks getting it put on the dyno, they can start it and get a base tune going and do a few ramps up to 75% redline at a few pounds of boost like rob82 said.

You should always run an engine in a proper state of tune. Anything else is just brainless.

Like I said the rings wont bed if its too rich as it will wash the bores - so run it in on the dyno and make sure your mixtures are right.

I was hoping he would be using a builder/workshop to run it in etc so they "should" know whats needed

:D

Here’s what I would do;

Use the PFC

Drain the tank and put some Shell Optimix Extreme 100 ron in it.

Stick the 444 cc injectors in it

Reduce the injector duration by 30% (close enough for 444 cc’s / 270 cc’s)

Start it and check the exhaust pipe smoke

If it’s thick and black, then take another 5% out of the duration

Let it warm up at a fast idle, say 1200 to 1500 rpm till it gets to ~80 degrees

Drop the idle to normal (~750 rpm)

Then check the exhaust pipe smoke, smell it

If you can smell heavy unburnt fuel, then lean it off 2% at a time.

The PFC will go into closed loop running once the unburnt fuel smell is gone.

Keep the boost low, take it for a drive and watch the knock readings on the Commander.

If you are getting ANY knock, retard the ignition until it disappears

After 15 minutes or so, go home, open the bonnet, pull up a chair and have a beer

Once the engine is cooled down, pull the plugs out and have a look at them

They should be dark brown, but not black.

If they are not black, then set off early in the morning to the dyno.

Try and make sure you run closed loop cruising as much as possible

By the time you get there it will be run in enough for a mild tune.

:) cheers :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...