Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I beleive VW have been using variable vane turbos for years

Vw and Audi engines Use VTG turbos for there diesils , the petrol engines run a combination of k03/k04 KKK turbos.

Edited by Jolinator

I doubt if Nissan Australia will sell you spare parts cheaper with a bulk buy, but you can always try. Just go into your nearest Nissan spare parts and order a 14411-VC100 replacement turbo for a Nissan Patrol 4WD. This one took two days to come from interstate, but any Nissan dealer can get one in pretty quickly.

Some of the more recent small Mercedes diesel delivery vans sold in Australia now use VNT turbos too. I don't know how big these turbos are. The Nissan Patrol VNT is probably still the largest VNT readily available in oZ, except perhaps for Porsche. I don't know how much a new Porsche VNT turbo would cost, probably $6,000+ maybe ? And as Porsche use two of them, they may not be all that big either.

But you will also need to figure out a way to control the vanes. The Nissan control actuator looks exactly like a wastegate actuator, but it works entirely backwards. The vanes are held fully open by a spring in the actuator can. Increasing vacuum to the actuator closes the vanes. There is an adjustment screw to set (mechanically) how far the vanes can close at maximum control vacuum. When closed completely the vanes seal right up against each other, and all exhaust flow from the engine is completely blocked. But you can readily set the minimum vane opening position to best suit the engine. It looks a bit like the stop screw on an ordinary throttle body, and works in a similar way on the vane control arm.

You will want the vanes fully open all the time except when you want to see some boost pressure during acceleration. The vanes must then very quickly close. The vanes must then gradually open far enough to hold boost at whatever pressure it should be.

However you decide to do that, you are going to have to design and build your own vane controller actuator, and figure out a whole control strategy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...