Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes.there was a really noticable falloff of performance when putting the pod on.when i put the box etc back on it was quite a bit better again than before because i had painted it with the thermal paint & put the insulation on the outside as well.the car just seemed that much more responsive & stronger,if that makes sense?

cheers

warrick

the standard air box with better filter is so much better.

costs next to nothing and is designed properly...

not something you rig up yourself..

I'll never do a pod filter again on any car I have.

there are exceptions though..

sometimes people get FMIC and the piping prevents you from using the standard air box..

this I can understand..

Originally posted by warrick

yes.there was a really noticable falloff of performance when putting the pod on.when i put the box etc back on it was quite a bit better again than before because i had painted it with the thermal paint & put the insulation on the outside as well.the car just seemed that much more responsive & stronger,if that makes sense?

cheers

warrick

Sounds interesting Warrick.

My experience has been the opposite though. With the POD in it feels more responsive [aside from the noise]. I put the standard airbox back on recently just to test and it not only felt restricted [less responsive] but the max boost pressure dropped also! There were no other mods at the time - or manual boost changes.

I guess it may not be a good comparison though, between a Naturally Aspirated car and a Turbo [VT versus GTT in this case]?

I am not an advocate for pods but in my experience its a better performer over a stock airbox [this includes hi-flow panel filters too].

I have made a partition for my pod and even after several hundred kms of driving it remains fairly mild - warm but NOT hot!

let me qualify what i said though.for the first say 5 mins the pod did seem good but once you got the hot air around the k&n setup felt much better.it didnt seem to alter no matter what the temp but the pod altered considerably.dont get me wrong i have nothing against a pod but what i'm saying is if you are going to have one to get the full benefit all the time you need to have it enclosed with cold air plumbed in.

cheers

warrick

yes but how much $$$ did this cost?

My pod and partition setup [DIY] has so far cost me approx $50

A 'pro' setup will be at least $200 from what I have seen :(

One day, a nice ARC box would be nice :P

or one of these BMC ones http://www.autospeed.com/cgi-bin/browse.cg...duct=1004620002

Originally posted by sewid

Check out my Cold air partition site here with my now completed partition. Lots of pics.

http://www.endusk.com/skyline/caip/caip.html

Now that looks impressive.

When I put my pod on I noticed a drop in bottom end torque but once the revs got up i could feel it was a bit better (which makes sense as the pod has a bigger surface area than the stockie).

A few people have metioned that the stock intake has been designed really well (which makes a lot of sense since any R&D dept of any car manufacturer is full of $$$). So, bigger surface area + well designed intake = the way to go.

Yes?

I never said that STOCK filters were good.

I said the stock air box.

I put a TRUST filter element in my standard box.

MINES group in Japan always keep the stock air box in their cars.

if you haven't already seen it, see if you can get your hands on a copy of Best Motoring Number 5 (I think)

Take a look at the MINES GTR...

just a quick question.. Now that you have partitioned the air filter from the heat.. what about the pipe that goes to the turbo? wont that be absorbing the heat again? Why dont you wrap that with heat wrap? I did this setup on my other car(original box, with k&n flat filter, and larger intake pipe), and it seemed to run better with the heat wrap.. ?? any ideas?

I didnt actually mean wrap the turbo with heat wrap, just the piping to the turbo. On my mazda, the intercooler is some 3 times as big as this silly nissan one, and thats standard aswell. so, i guess that might affect the comparision aswell.

i was refering to the piping dude... you gotta think about what it does with the heat but shielding the piping, it holds it in, add's stress to localised parts due to excess heat internally, however drops underbonnet temps and mor eimportantly intake temp around filter... personal decision really, if you have a good sealed box around your filter you wont need it, but good thought tho.

Guest Robo's

Personally , i dont think the standard airbox is upto scratch, coming from other cars, where the airbox is much bigger than the turbo pipes etc. Remember the biggest restriction is your first restriction. The over the radiator duct, is good, but doesnt look big enough to supply enough volume of air. If you had another duct coming up from the front or something, that would be nice. Time for some planning.

I rang Purple Pig, they have some form of industrial rubber(9mm thick) which i could use as a divider. Anyone tried this, it is rated 70-80 degrees, is that enough?

i think what mtopxsecret6 means YBSLO4 is to wrap the piping from the airbox to the turbo so the cold air in the box is kept cold all the way to the turbo before it gets heated.i think if the air can be kept as close to the outside ambient as possible before entering the turbo it must help the intercooler do its job that much better.please correct me mtopsecret6 if i misread what you meant.

cheers

warrick

Guest Robo's
Originally posted by warrick

i think what mtopxsecret6 means YBSLO4 is to wrap the piping from the airbox to the turbo so the cold air in the box is kept cold all the way to the turbo before it gets heated.i think if the air can be kept as close to the outside ambient as possible before entering the turbo it must help the intercooler do its job that much better.please correct me mtopsecret6 if i misread what you meant.

cheers

warrick

Sounds good in theory. Ok how long is the pipe, maybe 30cm, how fast is air travelling? How much will heat effect during this period of travel? I dont know. Well if you can stop it , excelent, all too help that little old intercooler.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...