Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, I've just bought an R32 GTS-T and it's got a starting problem. The guy I bought it off told me that sometimes on cold mornings when you first start the car it sometimes takes a couple of tries to start it. He said it was because of the aftermarket cams not always being in the right position or something to kick over and it takes a couple of goes before they are in the right position? Now I dont think he's lying to me because I know him and he was honest with me about eveything else about the car, but it could be that he is wrong or mislead.

It started fine driving it home from his place after I bought it and has done so on a few other occasions but most of the time it wont start first try (and not just cold starts) and so now I just give it a bit of gas when I kick it over to "blip" the revs up and it will then hold idle and be fine.

What happens most of the time is you kick it over and the revs start to climb like it would normally but then the engine dies at around 200-300rpm.. but if you give it some throttle it is fine.

A mate of mine said it could be my starter motor?? I really have no idea, especially about the whole cams thing so I wanted to get some info from you guys.

The car has a bigger fuel pump (I dont try starting it till it finishes priming itself), an adjustable fuel pressure regulator and possibly bigger injectors (previous owner believed this and my mates say it would have to for the power its making).

Not sure what other info is relevant, could it be something to do with the battery, I'm not sure how hold it is and havent had it tested?

Any help would be greatly appreciated! I'm hoping it's not anything major!! :mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130908-starting-problem/
Share on other sites

Well, someone has gotten hold of the prickly end of the pineapple. The cams don't have to get themselves "in the right position". The cams have a constant angular relationship to the crank, so they are either in the right position or they aren't.

Is this engine running aftermarket ECU? (if its making power, then it probably is).

What is the fuel pressure while cranking?

Does the water temp sensor for the ECU work?

Does the AAC valve work properly?

Does the Cold Start Air valve (under the inlet plenum) work properly?

What fuel pump does it have? The bosch o44 pump in my previous 32 did not hold the pressure in the supply line once it was switched off. I could literally watch the fuel pressure drop when the engine was switched off. As a result the brief priming period offered by the ECU was not sufficient to build up system pressure resulting in multiple cranks to get the engine started. This is a good place to start looking.

Cheers

blind_elk- Is this engine running aftermarket ECU? (if its making power, then it probably is).

No, still running factory ECU.

What is the fuel pressure while cranking?

Fuel pressure (according to gauge on regulator) while cranking is 60psi (which is what it is when its at idle). Pressure drops back to zero if engine doesnt kick over.

Does the water temp sensor for the ECU work?

Not sure how to check this?? I ran a check on the ECU and it came up with 55 (all clear).

Does the AAC valve work properly?

Not sure, will look into it.

Does the Cold Start Air valve (under the inlet plenum) work properly?

Will look into this also.

BH_SLO32- It's got a 550hp walbro fuel pump.

Thanks for the replies.

I don't think so because it does it even when the car hasn't been left for very long.

For example, the day I bought the car it started fine driving it home then I stopped and got petrol and it took a few goes to start it again..

Most of the time I just "blip" the throttle as soon as I finish cranking the engine to make sure it starts fine.

If I dont give it any gas it will either

1) Revs climb to 200-300 then loses revs and engine stalls

2) Starts fine on its own

3) Car splutters at very low rpm (around 100rpm) trying to keep running but sounding like it will stall at any minute (I end up hitting the throttle to bump the revs up and then its fine and idles normally)

3) Car splutters at very low rpm (around 100rpm) trying to keep running but sounding like it will stall at any minute (I end up hitting the throttle to bump the revs up and then its fine and idles normally)

you described what my car does in the mornings, right there.

has done for years

Fuel pressure (according to gauge on regulator) while cranking is 60psi (which is what it is when its at idle).
WAY too much, particularly when combined with bigger injectors and a stock ECU. Spec is around 37.
WAY too much, particularly when combined with bigger injectors and a stock ECU. Spec is around 37.

Yeh as I said not 100% sure if it has bigger injectors or not.

Car was apparently dyno tuned by previous owner about 2 weeks ago and fuel pressure regulator was adjusted to correct A/F mixture.

I can get a dyno sheet if that would help?

If 60psi is too much fuel pressure will it be running too rich all the time?

Well, the pressure is almost double the standard pressure. So when the injector opens, nearly twice as much fuel is going to be injected. I'm surprised that running that rich it runs at all.

If they had to bump fuel pressure that much to correct the A/Fs, I'd be suspicious of the meter.

Most 32s seem to act like this.... some of you may disagree, but after filling up from empty on boost98 (yeah I know heaps of you say it's bad, but I wanted to see for myself), mine seems to start heaps better now.... go figure??

  • 3 weeks later...

anymore help people?

what should i check?

how do i check AAC, cold start valve etc. ??

"If they had to bump fuel pressure that much to correct the A/Fs, I'd be suspicious of the meter."

Car was tuned at 220rwkw @ 16psi when fuel pressure reg. was adjusted (to correct A/Fs). Would current fuel pressure be required for that boost/power level or do you still think A/F meter might be faulty? The guy I bought it off said the tuner cleaned the A/F meter.

I'm pretty sure fuel pressure was 60psi before, now at idle it shows 50psi.. and as someone else said, it drops pressure when car is off..

i.e. crank -> 50/60psi -> if engine doesnt start -> drops back to 0psi.

Car has 550hp walbro fuel pump.

I just need to know what I should be checking to try and fix this??

Thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...