Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all.

i bought these a while ago with the intention of putting them in my mistress but have decided to sell and wait till i can afford a full adj' coilover setup!

i bought them off ebay a few months ago for just over 270.

i feel that $200 is a fair price. 200 INCLUDING shipping that is. pick up in the mornington peninsula area would be alright too (say $180 for pick up).

PRICE DROP!!!- NOW ASKING $170 INCLUDING POSTAGE

according to the ebayer i bought them off they lower the car 30-35mm.

dont know for sure but ive been told from a reasonable source that they are much stiffer than the stock springs too (but dont hold me to that!)

to contact me you can do the obvious: pm or reply in this post. or call/ sms my mobile on 0423 043 495. james is my name.

not particularly negotiable on price- unless you can show me a genuine place that sells the same item new for much cheaper.

cheers. james.

sub wooofers go bump bump bump bump.

just like me in this reply.

bump

EDIT: if there is anything in the list in my signature that you are trying to sell that you are willing to swap for, we can make some sort of arrangement. cheers!

  • 2 weeks later...

alrighty then.

i called up king springs and they themselves had said that the rear ones are good for a both the GTS-T and GTS-4 (they said "its suitable for both the rear wheel dirve and the 4WD" so i assume that its ok for the GTR) HOWEVER the FRONT springs are only good for the gts/ gts-t.

PATTO: steven from king springs said that it lowers it 25- 30 mm. which isnt much but ive driven a 32 with these springs on them and it look good, and is easy to drive aswell.

cheers. james.

If you want to ask any more questions please call them on (07) 5539 6700 and quote the part numbers KDRL 102 (the rear ones) and KDFL 101 (fronts)

this was the effect of King Spring Sport lows after only a day or so, still got a bit of dropping to do:

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...t&p=2333355

fair bit lower, but most importantly alot better handling.

Edited by nisskid

bump!

desperate to get rid of them, not desperate to lower the price though.

hurry up and buy these someone!

cheers. james.

please read above.

lowers the car 25-30mm.

take a ruler to your car and find out what the height is take off 25-30mm.

BAM! thats how low it sits.

cheers.

im located in VIC so if anyone want to pic up from here...

however a mate is selling these in sydney.

heres the link.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=134177

cheers. james.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...