Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It all depends on what else is done to the car, and what you use the car for.

Stored flywheel inertia and some clutch slip is the only way to get ANY manual transmission car moving from complete standstill without stalling. But so very much depends on available engine torque, vehicle weight, and overall gear reduction in first gear.

Once you are moving, the flywheel is nothing but extra weight and extra inertia you no longer need. A circuit race car is not normally doing constant starts, so a very light flywheel is usually an advantage.

A drag race car with excellent traction will launch harder with a heavy flywheel, but that same flywheel may slow down the rate of acceleration once it has launched.

Turbo engines are special, because they usually have minimal torque when off boost, particularly when starting off. If your engine is laggy and has a fairly high boost threshold, a light flywheel is going to make starting off even more difficult than it already is.

If you drive the car every day in heavy traffic, a very light flyweel is quite likely going to be a real pain in the arse, especially with a highly modified turbo engine.

In flat places like Melbourne, it will not be quite so bad as in hilly Sydney. Starting off facing up hills needs plenty of flywheel.

Once you are moving, the flywheel is nothing but extra weight and extra inertia you no longer need. A circuit race car is not normally doing constant starts, so a very light flywheel is usually an advantage.

A drag race car with excellent traction will launch harder with a heavy flywheel, but that same flywheel may slow down the rate of acceleration once it has launched.

Turbo engines are special, because they usually have minimal torque when off boost, particularly when starting off. If your engine is laggy and has a fairly high boost threshold, a light flywheel is going to make starting off even more difficult than it already is.

Its 'almost' a little contradictory but not quite. The initial take off may require a few more rev's but once past this the car will (as I noticed) rev up quicker and feel as if it actually has a little more off boost acceleration. I didn't notice the more rev's requirement from a standing start under normal driving conditions, it was only when launching the car.

As I think I said earlier I found the gutless rb20 easier to launch with the lightened flywheel, it did require more rev's other wise it would bog but launching at the correct rpm it felt as if it was easier to control any wheel spin that occured and it simply got off the line cleaner.

An R32 GTS4.... I would most definitely stick with the stock flywheel, they require an almost redline launch not to prevent bog, in this circumstance a lightened flywheel would cause launching problems as a result possibly slower 0-100 and 1/4 times. As we all know the faster we can get up to speed earlier the quicker our 1/4 will be. The old Auto VLT's are a prime example of this running mid 10's with only ~300rwkw.

I'm with Cubes on this one, and is the exact reason I'm going for a lightened flywheel when I change my clutch in the next few months hopefully. The RB20 is a dog for me driving into/out of the city every morning, stop start conditions, and off boost acceleration is very poor.

Also of note, what I picked up a few weeks back. The weight of a flywheel is not as important as the distance that weight is from the centre. I believe it is a radius ® squared relationship. Hence a 10kg flywheel with a large part of it's weight on the extremities will be a lot harder to turn than a 10kg flywheel with most of its weight near the centre. This is why you see standard flywheels being lightened with holes/removal of steel as near the extremities as you can get. This has big benefits even though it may only lighten the flywheel by a few kg's.

Fixxxer :D

I have a 4.5kg flywheel in my car.

Positives:

- engine revs easier

- revs drop really quickly

- less engine braking

Negatives:

- revs drop quickly between gear changes

- need revs to get the car off the line

- meh..

I like it.

  • 4 weeks later...

Slightly cheaper price for what looks like the same item here;

http://www.tweakit.net/shop/index.php?cPath=326_367_374

Does anyone know the weight of the RB25DET standard flywheel?

Also Aluminium @ 5.0kg for around $520 or Chrome-Moly @ 5.5kg for $100 less???

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...