Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK guys,

I know this has been done on other forums, so lets get it going here.

It is a great way for us all to get an idea of what mods create what power on what cars. Only list performance/power related mods as that is what this thread is all about.

Here is mine.....

CAR:

R32 GTR

MODS:

Trust Airinx Filter Kit

Trust MX front pipes (2 x 75mm into 1 x 80mm)

Hi Flow 3"(80mm) Cat

Buddy Club Racing Spec III Exhaust (89.1mm through)

HKS Slide Cam Pulleys (cam gears) - IN and EX

Custom Bleed Valve

1.1 Bar Boost

DYNO RESULT:

240 Rear Wheel Kilowatts on RacePace Dyno Dynamics Dyno

QUARTER MILE TIME:

11.573 @ 117.89 mph (1.712 sec sixty foot)

Shaun.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1335-power-output-and-14-mile-times/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

R31 Nissan pintara station wagon

SPECS -

rb20det conversion

Full 3inch ****** (not going to give them any advertisement) Exhaust Inc trust style Dump pipe

Supra 7m front mount

****** Pod filter

Basic Turbo Smart bleed valve/ Apexi Dual sbc

Gts-x Front brakes and calipers

Laurel Wheels 15"

Standard rear suspension and diff (read - Sloppy and single spinner)

Performance -

13.8 @ 100 mph (12psi)

170 rwhp (9psi)

My last 1/4 time & rwkw fig's are in my sig' :)

The car has one or two mod's.

It was run on Falken 255/40/17's with 38psi tyre pressure.

I'll get around to taking it back to AIR for some new times soon.

Originally posted by BOOSTMEISTER

13.8  

You have got to be kidding right:uh-huh: :uh-huh: :uh-huh:  

I am sorry but is that possible????

Awesome effort if thats what you did....I must be a completely useless driver to only better that by .1 with 100hp more than you + I have a 85% locked diff?

it was on 12psi rather then 9 as it was dynoed on so probably had closer to 190 hp at the wheels and less boost bleeding.

It was done at the kwinana motorplex in perth after an international meet and the track was rather sticky. With minimal traction loss in 2nd and only a bit in 1st.

I have a timeslip though i dont have a scanner, it is real. Also the pintara may be slightly lighter then your car and have better diff ratio (read : 4.11)

13.8 with a RB20DET running an open wheeler and 12psi.

hrmm..

When i was running 12.5 PSI with fuel at around 12.1-12.5:1 (no over fueling) I made 152rwkw. Which is almost 204HP at the rears.

She didn't feel like a 13.8 sec car then and even now she doesn't with a FMIC and almost 1 bar of boost.

If I remember correctly I think the R32 GTS-T has a 4.3:1 diff ratio or is it 4.1 also?!?! I'm pretty sure its 4.3 btw.

i.e 50-55km's in first & approx 90-95 in second.

The R32 GTS-T Weighs around 1300kg's.

The Pintara wagon would weigh probably the same if not more I would think.

Before I had the FMIC fitted I noticed that it was easier to control wheel spin through first as it didn't kick as hard even on stock boost.

For example on stock boost with 225' 50's on the rear without the fmic the rear's would not spin now with the fmic boost kicks and wheel spins in first. On high boost there is no way i can put my foot flat. Taking off and holding it just past 1/4 throttle will cause the 225's with 29psi pressure to spin and squeel. Once it starts to spin there's almost no way that I can stop it, I usually short shift which causes it to spin in second quite a bit but it seems to pick up a bit better then stuffing around in first trying to get traction. And thats with LSD.. Good luck with an open wheeler.

Got a bit off topic didn't I.

Guest white180

hey guys :) i know i dont have a skyline but i thought id add my bit anyway : 1992 180sx

sr20det

5 speed

mods : full 3 inch exhaust turbo to tip kakimoto cat back front bit is a job done by a guy in bently full stainless dump pipe is a bit of 3 inch with a bit of an extra bit welded on to cover wastegate pipe

: bilstein front shocks and springs (read:stiff as ever) rear i dunno what they are but they are matching the front as far as height goes but arnt nearly as stiff

: pod airfilter k and n usual S***

: 14 psi by way of either ebc or turbosmart crappy little bleed valve but i was borroing the ebc from rb20lagwagon and he needs it so yeah u get that :)

: 16 inch volk racing wheels 16x6 front (205/60r16) 16x7 rear (225/55r16)

performance : before boost and front pipe on exhaust ie no dump pipe and no bleed valve or ebc my fastest 1/4 was 14.2 no dyno runs at that point

: after ebc and boost i have achieved 179.3 bhp@ wheels and it goes a hell of alot faster now too :D no run at the motorplex cause its shut down for the winter :) will let u know how i progress

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...