Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This Tech Article is more a primer to give more information of the workings of a RB20DET (possibly more RB motors) and the two common mods used to improve upon it's design to sustain higher boost levels without leaking. I've included links to the Tech articles covering these mods in more detail.

Background:

A BOV acts to release boost pressure between the turbo and throttle body when the throttle plate is shut. This is good for two reasons:

1.) With the pressure released the turbo will continue to spin freely = better transitional boost response (quick spool btw gear changes)

2.) The pressurized air would otherwise hit the closed throttle plate and like an ocean wave, reverse course making it’s way back to the compressor causing it to abruptly slow, possibly causing damage to the wheel.

The 1G BOV while infinitely better than the crappy plastic 2G valves, is still an OEM piece that was never intended to boost much above stock levels (13psi) and will leak at higher boost levels.

It is important to first see how a BOV works to figure out how to improve upon it.

The below pic (minus the air fittings on the mounting flange) are of a 1G BOV. The “top hat” section of the BOV contains a diaphragm and spring which is used to raise/lower a valve at the bottom based on air pressure on either side of the diaphragm combined with the spring tension. The Blue lines represent airflow from the UIP and the Red line airflow from the behind the throttle plate.

BOV_1.jpg

The BOV in stock form uses both air pressures to operate the BOV. When under boost (throttle plate open), the Red and Blue pressures are equal and the BOV’s valve will remain closed based solely on the top hat's internal spring pressure (well until too much boost force on the valve itself overcomes the springs tension and pushes it open).

When the throttle closes (btw gear shifts when you let off the gas pedal), the air pressure in the UIP remains positive (Blue), but the air pressure behind the throttle plate goes to negative (Red). This is what helps the BOV to “quick release” as you have complementary forces (pull=Red /push=Blue) at work to open the valve.

This is all good at OEM boost levels, but once you turn the boost up, the pressure inside the UIP can force the BOV valve itself to unseat (blow it open), much like what happens to an upgraded 38mm wastegate flapper if the actuator is not strong enough.

When this happens, you are loosing boost pressure, which the turbo will have to work harder (faster RPMs, more heat, less efficient) to maintain. If you are running 18psi at the intake and you are loosing 2psi from the BOV, your turbo is actually running at 20psi (well more due to pressure drop across the IC/Piping but that’s fodder for another tech article :D )

Dodge Garage Mod?

The Dodge Garage mod seeks to block the Blue line (UIP Pressure) so that only the Red line (Intake pressure/Vacuum) influences the BOV operation. So now instead of equal pressures above/below the BOV diaphragm under boost, only the top section (Red) from the intake is being fed, so you have additional downward pressure on the BOV valve equal to the boost pressure you are running. More pressure = more boost can be run before the spring/valve is overrun.

To do this, this mod involves "plugging" the inlet on the bottom of the BOV flange (JB Weld) that fed the underside of the diaphram with air pressure, and drilling a hole in the original passageway to relieve any pressure from the underside of the BOV diaphram.

I took this a step further and drilled a second hole on the opposite side the original boost feed and again in the flange to give me the the option to have "quick release" if I ever wanted it (which I haven't). Connecting the two new air tubes will give me OEM BOV operation.

BOV2x.jpgBOV2x.jpg

Crushing:

"Crushing" the BOV just means sticking the piece in a vice and pressing the top had down causing the internal spring to shorten and increase pressure on the BOV valve.

Warning, crushing too much will prevent the BOV from opening enough/at all and will cause boost surge. I crush mine so the boost nipple is flush with the middle tier of the top hat (as far as it will go without bending the nipple) and holds well to 25psi :wub:

Combining both these mods will elevate the boost threshold even further :)

any additional info is welcomed as i still consider myself new to RB motors

the problem with the mod you have writen about is that it makes the car run leaner, which isn't safe. instead of just recirculating the air it is getting more air into the system that isn't being measured by the afm. so if you have an aftermarket ecu and the car is tuned to be right on the money DO NOT DO THIS MOD!

a better way to do it is to use a big drill bit to counter sink a hole then screw a screw into the hole. this seels off the recirculation hole, and doesn't introduce any new air into the system.

So the above mod is to reduce the chances of boost leak at higher levels of boost, right? Squashing the hat down to put more pressure on the spring, and relocating the recirculation hole.

And mad082's link shows how to block just the recirculation hole to retain a bit of pressure and theoretically make the turbo not work as hard.

So can I ask: What is the recirculation hole there for in the first place? What benefit (relilability?) did Nissan/Mitsubishi have in mind when they designed it?

honestly i didnt mess with drilling and capping... in the past i have only used the crush-mod. So read and heed what mad082 has to say thanks for the feedback on this.

ill look into the other mod more in depth..... i have access to alot of the jap shops out here so ill check around.

i have a theory on the recirculation hole. they aren't just on skylines. i did a cooler install on a my99 wrx and it had the same bov, and i have seen them on other cars too.

my theory is that at full noise the compressor has to work harder (spin faster) to keep up the boost at the set level. this may sound like a bad thing but it isn't that bad. WHY? because since the compressor has to work harder, the exhaust wheel has to spin faster. this allows more air to pass out through the exhaust wheel, and less out of the wastegate.

another positive of the hole is that it is recirculating cold air. the air coming out of the hole has just been cooled by the intercooler. and then as it escapes out the hole it cooles again as it expands (the act of compressing air heats it up, and decompressing it cools it - thats how a fridge works) this cold air is going back into the intake. this cools the air between the AFM and the turbo.

and yet another positive is that when the hole is blocked the vacuum created in the return hose can cause the bov to be sucked open slightly (that is the theory behind the mod in the top post of this thread). this is 1 of the design flaws of the stock bov. since it is a flat plate, the moment it moves it leaks boost. most aftermarket bovs have a plug that has to move a few mm before it will release air, so the vacuum has less effect on them.

the only other downside to the stock bov is the fact that when the hole is open it takes longer for boost to build. when it is blocked boost will build quicker, but i found that more boost bleeds off due to the hole being blocked, but that may just due to my bov being weak. i did scuash it a bit and it held better, but i find the release of boost is quicker with the bov unplugged.

will take 1 tonight. i just took it off, got a big socket (about a 21mm) sat it on the top and gave it a few medium strenght taps. now i don't mean medium hits, as if you were trying to break something off, but taps, like tapping a nail in. you use gentle taps to get the nail to go in a bit so it holds itself up, then slightly harder taps once it is about 1/4-1/2 way in. you only need a few taps to do it. you will see the top start to squash in.

Please note: i take no responsability for BOV's that are damaged by this process.

interesting thanks Mad, i have been doing some testing also and pretty much confirming most of your notions.

to properly crush a bov use a bench-vise. it works to crush it perfectly semetrical, crush it until the outlet pipe is flush with the top of the hat, in better words, when the pipe touchs the hat your good.

I am also new to RB motors, so you may have to excuse me.

I would like to know if there is any decent proof that this standard BOV does leak at higher boost levels..?

You compared it to a wastegate, which is completely different, if the wastegate can't flow enough, then boost rises.. The opposite doesn't apply for a BOV.

And as you stated, it works based on the pressure difference from either side of the throttle plate... Therefore, no matter how much boost you throw at it, it will still remain neutral with basically identical pressures both pushing the BOV open, and holding it shut. (So, because of the internal spring it will stay shut).

Unless this device is built to act as a POV ((Pop off valve) don't know if they're still called that).

The POV was featured on most of the earlier turbo cars, 70's & 80's.. It's purpose was to vent excess boost pressure if the boost got to high. So if you have a failure with the wastegate system of the turbo, the motor wont then be forced everything the turbo can throw at it. :) sorry if that didn't make sense.

Or perhaps because of higher boost, and inlet modifications, the internal spring can't hold the small difference in pressure because of a big front mount cooler etc.

In that case, why not run the vaccum hoses from somewhere else..? (hook up 1 either side of the throttle body, or at least both hoses from the same side of the cooler (after it))..

Or if it is meant to act as a POV (or whatever), why can't that bit be removed/disabled from the BOV...?

Now I'm confusing myself even more....

Hope all that made sense to somebody, coz I aint proof readin...

the reason why the BOV will creep open is due to the force of the air passing by it, not pressure, and the vaccum of the plumback pipe sucking it open. and it is getting direct pressure by the air passing by it, where as the pressure holding it shut is coming through a small tube.

also once there is a slight leak, the air in the pressurised area will try to escape out of the place where the leak is to a lower pressure area.

quick question bit off topic... but why on some occasions do i see people use the TBO rubber caps to cap off the BOV and the BOV outlet piping.

Edited by 4DoorWhore

because they are idiots. plain and simple.

they do it for 2 reasons other than that though.

1. to make it flutter

2. to stop it leaking boost, and make it spool up faster.

the down side to blocking off the bov completely is that you have much more lag on gearchanges (unless you don't lift off the throttle). if you have an auto then it is ok to do it, but the immediate response if you lift off then step on the gas again will be slower.

you probs wana becareful if you do this... or maybe not squash it to much...

hehe i learnt the hard way :blink: I did it to my bov the other night.. i squashed it so the outlet pipe went as far down as it could go without bending.

Anyways now after i change gears and put my foot down, boost builds up realy realy fast but it takes the car like a second or 2 to actualy start moving... :D

goto find another bov now :(

to properly crush a bov use a bench-vise. it works to crush it perfectly semetrical, crush it until the outlet pipe is flush with the top of the hat, in better words, when the pipe touchs the hat your good.

i think the bit about crushing it till the outlet pipe is flush with the hat should be removed. i seriously think that is too far as well. sure it would stop the bov from leaking, but it will also limit the amount of air that can escape, so people running higher boost are going to get more lag on gear changes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...