Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Having abit of an oily situation at the moment. It seems where the gearbox connects to the motor, there is an aparant small leak of oil, which ive just recently noticed. It also appears to be motor oil, rather than gearbox oil.

Oil levels in the car are fine, however ive been told this could be the rear main seals. Which im not too sure what is meant by this. Excuse my ignorance.

If so, is it an expensive job to fix up? How much longer should I be driving like this?

Any help would be appreciated. Car is a S15 with sr20det

Thanks

post-8163-1158565257.jpg

post-8163-1158565287.jpg

Edited by Mr_G
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134824-bit-of-an-oily-problem/
Share on other sites

it more than likely is your rear main seal.

check if you're leaking from the back of the head too. your half moons or rocker seals could be worn too.

to get to your rear main seal you'll need to take your gearbox off.

the rear main seal sits in the rear main seal housing, not all cars have this housing but this is how it was on my car (rb25det).

i had to undo bolts off the sump then some 10mm bolts holding the housing in. you wont need to undo your sump completley, those four or so bolts should do.

make sure you use some gasket maker like ultra blue or ultra black when putting the new main seal in, one of them is the higher oil resistant one, so use that. use some more on the bottom of the housing to seal it between the sump.

the main seal cost me around $20 with the sau discount from nissan.

will most likely be the rocker cover gaskets at the back leaking and dripping down. best way to go about things to be sure is clean it all down with degreaser and and then check it daily to find the fresh leak then you will be able to tell were exactly its coming from.

will most likely be the rocker cover gaskets at the back leaking and dripping down. best way to go about things to be sure is clean it all down with degreaser and and then check it daily to find the fresh leak then you will be able to tell were exactly its coming from.

ditto, they can be sneaky

Mine looks the same and I've got a rocker cover gasket leak, just drips down in a scary spot is all hehe

worth doing as the others said and cleaning it, checking for fresh oil, but do it soon because if it IS a main rear seal you dont really wanna drive on it and risk doing your clutch in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...