Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys

just wondering what other dyno results are around on 34's.

Thes are my mods:

Full 3.5" kakimoto exhaust

A-vcr boosted @ 1 bar

Power FC

Front mount intercooler

i had problems with this mechanic but the car feels ok.

Should i get it dynoed/tuned again or is this result ok for these mods.

before i had the Power fc and FMIC tune i ran the car and got a 13.6@ 101mph but i was only running .85 bar(12psi)

cheers

steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138462-1869rwkw-1bar-on-my-r34/
Share on other sites

Sounds a little low given you're running 1bar, but if we could get a look at your dyno sheet that would be great.

btw.. that's on the stock turbo? just that 1 bar on the stock 34 turbo seems a little excessive.

yeah its the stock turbo. thats my point ive been reading everywhere that we shouldnt boost it to 1 bar all the time, but the mechanic that tuned it said it would be fine. ive been running it constantly at 1 bar and it seems fine.

Sounds fine to me. Remember a dyno is just a tuning tool/indicator.

Obviously time to time there are extremely bogus readings...

But i usually allow a 15rwkw variance for any given dyno on any given day and then you'll find most results fit into that variance.

But 190rwkw is pretty much spot on dude.

Some dyno's will have your car around 200, some 190, some possibly 180.

If the power graph is smooth, car feels/drives well... thats what really matters.

Although i wouldnt run 1bar... turbo isnt going to like that forever.

  • 1 month later...

mate....that sounds real low........mate of mine gets 181rwkws with just .7 bar of boost and a exhaust and thats with no cooler.....get it retuned

Edited by anDru

As 'R31Nismoid' says, allow for +-15rwkw variance on different dyno's. There are that many variables that can affect the power output (Tyre size, wheel spin, dyno calibration etc.) and if you had issues with your mechanic he's probably tuned it rich just to be safe. Did your mechanic use FC datalogit to tune the PFC or just the hand controller?

To me that sounds spot on mate, I'm personally expecting 175-185rwkw with turbo back, pod and 10psi.

EDIT: Just read 1 bar, but even then I'd say its pretty spot on. After 12psi the stock R34 turbo apparently is just blowing hot air so I'd crank that down to 12psi max mate.

Edited by Andi
mate....that sounds real low........mate of mine gets 181rwkws with just .7 bar of boost and a exhaust and thats with no cooler.....get it retuned

retuned? why?

Did you mate have his car dyno'd....

on the same dyno?

at the same time?

on the same day?

If you answered NO to any of the above three, then you have absolutely no claim to say its wrong, or it needs a retune.

anDru, you really need to think before hitting the submit post button.

190's is wots to be expected realistically.

My 34 - Power FC, turboback, FMIC, BC kit - 194rwkw at 14psi. That was during the tune, i dont run it anymore than 13psi. Like most have said turbo is just out of efficiency after that.

retuned? why?

Did you mate have his car dyno'd....

on the same dyno?

at the same time?

on the same day?

If you answered NO to any of the above three, then you have absolutely no claim to say its wrong, or it needs a retune.

anDru, you really need to think before hitting the submit post button.

mate that is a HUGE difference and not some 15kws u said.....compared to my mate...and i no there might be some diff with not the same dyno and not the same day blah blah but can a car seriously be losing around 20-30 kws just from that?

::EDIT::

i just gave my mate a call (he got his car dynoed again) and his achieving 200 rwkws with .85 bar, FMIC, and a standard 3" turbo back

i dunno man but "tough r34s" dosnt sound so good

Edited by anDru

My mate has a R34 with

HKS2530

dump-back exhaust

fmic

pfc -tuned at CHASERS

GFB bleed valve

spitfire coilpacks

made 207rwkw at 12psi but i suppose its got more in it.

My R33 has an safc, dump back zorst, fmic at 12psi it made 211.2rwkw.

If i were you take it to C&D Motorworks in Braybrook (Melbourne) for a re-tune.

A later model skyline with a Neo motor should at least reach the 195-205rwkw zone.

Diagnose your engine for any possible problems that may be preventing your engine from producing its actual power reading.

nah nah nabil r31nismoid said we all should think before we post about how a r34 should run......

because we are all stupid because we believe a fellow r34-ers car isnt running as good as it should

hehe he just said YOU need to ;)

nah nah nabil r31nismoid said we all should think before we post about how a r34 should run......

because we are all stupid because we believe a fellow r34-ers car isnt running as good as it should

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...