Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have just purchased and installed HSD Coilovers to my R32 GTR. I am now forced to sell them for financial reasons which is very disappointing for me because the car is now handling like a dream.

I ordered these with 5kg/mm front springs and 4kg/mm rear springs which suit the street really well. They are firm and responsive on the street with the option of winding up the dampner setting for hills or track work.

They been on the car for 6 weeks and only drive the car on weekends, they are virtually new.

Located in Adelaide but can negotiate shipping as i have most of the original packaging. Includes the stickers, c spanners, etc.

Paid $1599, selling for $1350 $1150 $1050

Last price drop before taking off the market - 65% of new cost!

I can take pictures of them on the car before i pull them off if required.

Wegs

Edited by wegs
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140273-r32-gtr-hsd-coilovers/
Share on other sites

I didn't know there was a measurement for dampning rates. I haven't come across any in the advertising i've seen for HSD or other coilovers. I currently have it set on level 5 dampning all round (where 1 is minimum and 15 is maximum)

Here is an excerpt from HSD:

HSD coil-overs feature 55mm heavy-duty full-tapped dampers with 15-step damping adjustment. All models feature pillow-ball top mounts for easy installation and maximum control. Models with strut-type suspension also feature camber adjustment, while all models feature adjustable base height and spring seat height. HSD coil-overs are supplied with spring rates intended for club-level motorsport, drift and street driving. Harder or softer springs are also available at just $100 a pair. All rates from 3kg/mm to 14kg/mm are kept in stock. All HSD coil-overs come with a 12-month warranty against manufacturing defects.

I wouldn't expect these to fit R32 GTS-t as not much is interchangeable in the R32 suspension dept. Have again lowered the price due to some lowish offers made that weren't followed through with.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...