Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You got big GUNS don't you!!! Put some muscle into it with a breaker bar. Worked for me LOL. hex 14 mm socket will give you a fighting chance.

You will be getting new dumps won't you Gun, it'd be a real shame if you didn't.

You got big GUNS don't you!!! Put some muscle into it with a breaker bar. Worked for me LOL. hex 14 mm socket will give you a fighting chance.

You will be getting new dumps won't you Gun, it'd be a real shame if you didn't.

rolmao i have massive guns sean....

yeh ill give it another crack this arvo

yeh course getting new dumps and fronts and looks like ill need cat back 2

O nice what type of titainium exhurst you go for.

im 100% sure i bought it off these forums.the bloke said its a jap brand one and sounds unreal.its 3 1/4 inch straight through with 4inch canon..weights in at 3.1kg...

Edited by gun32gtr
Which Turbs did you end up going Kane 2860-5, 2860-7 or the GT-SS from Nengun. Just read more of the thread.

Please post your results when complete.

hey mate

i went the -5 as there got massive potential from some other results i have seen.im aiming for 300awkw and thts easy on these turbos as there was a bloke that posted he has 380kw or something and gunna lean on the turbos bit more,so yeh ill let ya all no when its tuned etc

hey mate

i went the -5 as there got massive potential from some other results i have seen.im aiming for 300awkw and thts easy on these turbos as there was a bloke that posted he has 380kw or something and gunna lean on the turbos bit more,so yeh ill let ya all no when its tuned etc

Thanks - I'm going down the same path and going to purchase new turbs 1st week feb from CRD. I have R34N1's (-7) which made 305rwkws @ 18psi until the front one died. Too exy to repair.

From a response point of view was looking to go the same again. However teetering between the -7 and -5 and with you almost there your dyno results/map will be very interesting to compare.

i went the -5 as in the future when the motor pops all do a full house rebiuld and really stand on thesae turbos try for 380+++KW and see,but hey that hopefully a little while away yet..

still waiting on the turbos should have been here this week but will see

yeh ya can bend titanium well this is bent and deff is titanium,man its light to pick up...

kano

I'd personally do the suspension, braking, wheels and tyres first.

Anyone can push an accelerator.

How many people can go around corners?

he pretty much doing the whole package. everyones got a limit to a budget lol.

anyone can push an accelerator thats true, but most cars wont go as fast as his car when its ready :P

what's taking so long on the turbos??

seems that the blokes supplier is on holidays,but im not worried ive got another 2weeks of holidays,plus im still waitin on me fronts from cerbera on these forums which has taken over 3 weeks and im pissed that he wont reply or pm back.... also im waiting on justjap to re open as i think there closed...

yeh ive just put coilovers in and the 18 i have,have ok tyres..i will be getting onto all the bushes over the next 8months cause thats how long i have till licence is back(long story)..

hanyou-it will be fast and i cant wait to hear my titanium exhaust.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...