Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

just a little update as its only little...

scraped the 044 intank f**k trying to get the right partds in bathurst is impossible...

so im going the stock gtr pump and surge tank with the 044 externally mounted....

will the stock pump be ok for the lift pump??????

Lol to " 517's arent as good as the GT-SS mate. Dont come close ". and " Dont get R32 N1's, they are shocking. There is a very good reason they are so cheap

Old design & shocking/poor response.

Its worth the extra $1500 for decent turbos" How can u say that n1 turbos suck?? if you ask anyone who knows what there talking about there en awesome turbo you can pump a shitload of boost into them and they dont blow up like the stock pieces of shit,

Look at mark berry's gtr is kills all the new porsches and ferarris at the track the n1 turbos arnt responsive you rekon thats the hole reason people use them is they come on boost nearly as quick as the stock ones! have a look at this video "

and this video "
n1 turbos! i wouldnt advise someone that already has n1 turbos not to use them caus there crap unless you know what your talking about ay. And to the t517z comment have you seen dyno graphs or been in a car with both setups the 517z's and gt-ss? i have the t517z setup in my gtr making 480hp at the wheels havent had a problem with them yet and they spool nice and early to..

now ive gone away from the 044 intank and instead be putting the stock pump back in and getting the a surge tank setup witht the 044 as the main pump..will i need a fuel pressure reg now or will the stock one b ok for this setup.

cheers kane

  • 2 weeks later...
Well is this thread for really as i scanned throught and could not believe the MISS IMFORMATION getting through around

I feel sorry for you gun32gtr how can i guy make informed decision with such B___sh_t

Rwhp and Awhp are not the same and at even close (it take power to turn axis and wheels unless the laws of physics have changed recently)

I dare anyone to back up the claims the avcr with not run a gtr boost requirements (Apexi drag car runs 110rwhpPlus on one)

and for people to say the gt2860r 707160-5 are laggy is utter crap i have gained better responce out of the -5 then i have seen out of hks2510 and i am yet to see anyone make better responce from gt-ss (sorry Biltz but i seen no evidence the gt-ss is more responive)

I run a R33 GTR rb26dett

with

Garret gt2860r 707160-5

Apexi PFC and handcontrol

Apexi AVCR

tomei 260deg 9.15mm lift

tomei cam wheels

700cc sard injector

z32afms

this combo makes 460rwhp+(345rwkw ~320awkw you loss about 40 to50rwhp to awhp but it varies) at actuator boost 14psi and 529.4rwhp at 20psi (so t04gtr you dont 1.5bar to make 320awkw with twins)

i have run this hp for a number of year now and it is post on the hyperdrive web site if you doubt me. So all i can say is check what you say has facts behind it as people are trying to make real decision on here and deserve true info not personal opinions byass.

pete

ps i have not attach any other combo but defended the gear i know. :P

Good to hear,

I have the -5's as well and am just fitting some mines cams and 700cc injectors now.

Allready have support mods so would be happy with some figures like that. Will see how it goes

Thanks for the info, Also I havent found the -5's to laggy at all in fact it pulls like a truck that just happens to have a 8,500 rpm Limit.

Cheers

Dabro

Lol to " 517's arent as good as the GT-SS mate. Dont come close ". and " Dont get R32 N1's, they are shocking. There is a very good reason they are so cheap

Old design & shocking/poor response.

Its worth the extra $1500 for decent turbos" How can u say that n1 turbos suck?? if you ask anyone who knows what there talking about there en awesome turbo you can pump a shitload of boost into them and they dont blow up like the stock pieces of shit,

Look at mark berry's gtr is kills all the new porsches and ferarris at the track the n1 turbos arnt responsive you rekon thats the hole reason people use them is they come on boost nearly as quick as the stock ones! have a look at this video "

and this video "
n1 turbos! i wouldnt advise someone that already has n1 turbos not to use them caus there crap unless you know what your talking about ay. And to the t517z comment have you seen dyno graphs or been in a car with both setups the 517z's and gt-ss? i have the t517z setup in my gtr making 480hp at the wheels havent had a problem with them yet and they spool nice and early to..

you are way off mate. there is a big difference between R32 N1s (aka group As) and R34 N1s. Mark and Russells car used to use R34 N1s, not the R32 ones.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...