Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

uh yeah cause they have bigger things.. i wnat the brakes. its not rocker science that skylines got bigger things to accomodate the weight and bulk of the vehicle..

Geee ya think captain obvious.

SRs ull find have more torque.. also a dicussion i had with my mate who has a N1 GTR and owned wrxs 180sx vspec gtrs everythin good friend of homer rules. was telling me bout the gearing on the SR box is more suitable than his GTST 33 and he has a 3540 i havent really experimented myself as of yet.

What utter bullshit, pure dribble and nonsense.

Lets look at some facts.

From factory; S13 180 SX, 2.0 Litre SR20DET, 1998cc DOHC 16 valve, Turbo ,4 cylinder, power 153kw @ 6000rpm, torque 274nm @ 4000rpm, rev limit 7500rpm, 1170-1230 kg, 0 - 100 6.18 seconds, 1/4 mile 14.30 seconds.

From factory; Skyline R32 GT-R RB26DETT, 2568cc DOHC 24 valve, EFI Straight 6 Twin Turbo, power 208kw @ 6400rpm, torque 353nm @ 4400rpm, rev limit 7500rpm, 1470 kg, 0 - 100 4.79 seconds. 1/4 12.80 seconds.

u care thats why u log on and read it instead of looking at porn.. but wer not starting massive debate. i just have more confidence in the lighter chassis SRs than the skylines.

I care you're posting on the wrong forums, there's a great forum for talking about silvia's and 180's and the all conquering sr motor, its called nissansilvia.com, try it? I think almost everyone will have more confidence in a lighter chassy car, thats why poeple modify them to be lighter?

Edited by Dynamix
ahaha... is that me... i love skyrines.. i have worked on many and driven more than u can count so dnt think i dont appreciate skyrines.. but only a GTR is a true rine

BNR32 FTW... the R34 was ok.. but prefer the 180.. GTR>180>R34

woah u need help R33 wer nasty.. i knw a couple of mechs from nissan and i quote "the R33 was a failure to evolve from the R32.

uh yeah cause they have bigger things.. i wnat the brakes. its not rocker science that skylines got bigger things to accomodate the weight and bulk of the vehicle..

SRs ull find have more torque.. also a dicussion i had with my mate who has a N1 GTR and owned wrxs 180sx vspec gtrs everythin good friend of homer rules. was telling me bout the gearing on the SR box is more suitable than his GTST 33 and he has a 3540 i havent really experimented myself as of yet.

u care thats why u log on and read it instead of looking at porn.. but wer not starting massive debate. i just have more confidence in the lighter chassis SRs than the skylines.

lol cartoons are cool.. u talkin bout wangan highway...midnight thing.. u douche im buying a BNR32 next year for top end shit lol. silvia is for drift. i still believe that a lower power SR sil will cut up a R33 with more power.

would be 84 dont think u can get 64 on T3.. if u could then LOL

mark, u really need to shut ur trap for a bit hey.

alot of people are starting to get sick of ur ramble and bs and ur assumptions that uve based upon ur first hand knowledge of initial d and japoon cartoons.

ur constant rambling about ur sick sr's and silvias is starting to get over the top.

drop it for awhile or take it over to ns.com, kapish?

LOL mate there is nothing on the coast......

mm bad choice Bunta, The gt30/71 gt30/76 series turbos have problems with exhaust gasses escaping from The internal gate. Ive been there and seen prove. Im having the same issues with my gt30/71, im prolly going to upgrade to the gt30/76 but with the t3 flange and ex gate OR run the hks gt30/37 series. I never new gt30/76 with the t3 flange comes internal gated....

yeah its a pretty shit choice it was only making 300rwkw at 17psi with an AFR of 8:1

seriously though in my case I have had no troubles, i was seceptical about buying the turbo but is has surprised me with both power and response

mark, u really need to shut ur trap for a bit hey.

alot of people are starting to get sick of ur ramble and bs and ur assumptions that uve based upon ur first hand knowledge of initial d and japoon cartoons.

ur constant rambling about ur sick sr's and silvias is starting to get over the top.

drop it for awhile or take it over to ns.com, kapish?

hey shane guess how much i care about what a ginger pubed lanky v plate gtr owner thinks... not much..

ur car run yet...

no it doesnt.

look i prefer the SR over the 20 and 25 in standard form. the talk has drifted elsewher. and i was talking about gearing. and the torque was in reference to a side by side comparison.. who cares if it makes 5million nm at 9000rpm thru out the revrange the SR feels meatier.. and having near 200kg less makes a difference.. lets talk sunny coast

ok my friend lives at redcliffe i was ther a while back and went to some shitty beach kinda lame. anyway i think i might go see her again soon and go to aother beach any GOOD beaches u guys recommend..?

Geee ya think captain obvious.

What utter bullshit, pure dribble and nonsense.

Lets look at some facts.

From factory; S13 180 SX, 2.0 Litre SR20DET, 1998cc DOHC 16 valve, Turbo ,4 cylinder, power 153kw @ 6000rpm, torque 274nm @ 4000rpm, rev limit 7500rpm, 1170-1230 kg, 0 - 100 6.18 seconds, 1/4 mile 14.30 seconds.

From factory; Skyline R32 GT-R RB26DETT, 2568cc DOHC 24 valve, EFI Straight 6 Twin Turbo, power 208kw @ 6400rpm, torque 353nm @ 4400rpm, rev limit 7500rpm, 1470 kg, 0 - 100 4.79 seconds. 1/4 12.80 seconds.

I care you're posting on the wrong forums, there's a great forum for talking about silvia's and 180's and the all conquering sr motor, its called nissansilvia.com, try it? I think almost everyone will have more confidence in a lighter chassy car, thats why poeple modify them to be lighter?

why would u compare S13 with a GTR.. ya n00b

u just angry cause u pumped all ur oil into ur head.

bring me specs of S13 vs R33 GTST cause this was the original debate. now chop chop before u spin a big end..

and LOL at a factory GTR doing 12.8 quarters. not that easy to do wth even a N1 std spec and since when did the GTR get ashitty 7500rpm limit?

why would u compare S13 with a GTR.. ya n00b

u just angry cause u pumped all ur oil into ur head.

bring me specs of S13 vs R33 GTST cause this was the original debate. now chop chop before u spin a big end..

and LOL at a factory GTR doing 12.8 quarters. not that easy to do wth even a N1 std spec and since when did the GTR get ashitty 7500rpm limit?

Mate pure and simple, you're f**king moron. I haven't heard someone talk so much f**king bullshit in a long time, no wonder everyone is flaming you. You're the one comparing the SR vs RB, i'm replying. You say your GT-R rev'd to 9000rpm in whoretown, you're a lier, unless your motor was built, and it's no cheap exercise building a high reving rb26, then after building such a motor why would you go sell that car off, Idiot. Yes the quickest time for a factory GT-R is 12.8, if you searched for facts you'd have know this instead of talking dribble about the SR, which no one wants to hear, as others in this thread have already said aswell as me. When did the gt-r get a shitty 7500rpm rev limit? When nissan set it at that? Oh and seeing you're just a budle if information you wouldn't need me to tell you that the r33 and r34 gt-r have a 8000rpm rev limit.

Now here's a to do list for you.

a) pissoff to ns or boost cruising

b) stop posting dribble thats not true

c) stop posting in the sunny coast thread when you're from brissy

d) stop talking about the sr vs rb in this thread, this is for sunny coast people, go start another thread if you dare

e) grow up, you're acting like a child, as others have pointed it out

Edited by Dynamix
Mate pure and simple, you're f**king moron. I haven't heard someone talk so much f**king bullshit in a long time, no wonder everyone is flaming you. You're the one comparing the SR vs RB, i'm replying. You say your GT-R rev'd to 9000rpm in whoretown, you're a lier, unless your motor was built, and it's no cheap exercise building a high reving rb26, then after building such a motor why would you go sell that car off, Idiot. Yes the quickest time for a factory GT-R is 12.8, if you searched for facts you'd have know this instead of talking dribble about the SR, which no one wants to hear, as others in this thread have already said aswell as me. When did the gt-r get a shitty 7500rpm rev limit? When nissan set it at that? Oh and seeing you're just a budle if information you wouldn't need me to tell you that the r33 and r34 gt-r have a 8000rpm rev limit.

Now here's a to do list for you.

a) pissoff to ns or boost cruising

b) stop posting dribble thats not true

c) stop posting in the sunny coast thread when you're from brissy

d) stop talking about the sr vs rb in this thread, this is for sunny coast people, go start another thread if you dare

e) grow up, you're acting like a child, as others have pointed it out

I think that everyone needs to calm down a lil and take ten deep breaths.

Not everyone is perfect with there records or information about things.

Yes i do agree the sr- rb -gtr debate has gone to far, and yes this is really only ment to be a sunshine coast thread,so can we please keep it that way and stope sticking sharp fkn bees up peoples bonnets.. the biggest man always walks away no matter how tall they stand.

Dynamix done anything to your gtr latley? Havent seen you on here much.

This thred is turning into shit.

So to change the topic, What would be the best mod to do to a factory skyline beside a 3 inch exaust all the way through?

Where is the closest Drag Strip and how much does it cost and what requirements are there to run??

Where is everyone going crusing this weekend?

(p.s the Sr - Rb - Gt-r debate is stupid it is personal preferance to the owner and based on mods on any car it could be faster than yours, you might see a starlet going wizzing passed you one day only to relise it had a supra motor in it)

just hang out with ur wang out. its soo much fun. srs are shit because they blow bearings all the time

rb25s are crap casue they blow rings/pistons all the time

rb26s are just crap cause there to hard to work on

and im the best cause i have a huge penis..matty u have to agree on the last one

ive owned every engine above, everytthing has pro and cons and there is no way u can compare a 4cyl 2 litre to a 6 2.5 or a 6 2.6 twin turbs

obviosly out of stock formation the 2.5 and the 2.6 both smash over the sr20 not sure bout the poxy rb20 tho ;)

oi shut up with the damn engine debate..... so gay youre all repeating yourselves.

rabit... i reccomend a fmic, i have a fmic and exhaust and make 255hp on 10psi... stock basically..

considering that can beat a stock gtr (206hp) its a good investment.

and other mods.... but not telling

Edited by r33cruiser
This thred is turning into shit.

So to change the topic, What would be the best mod to do to a factory skyline beside a 3 inch exaust all the way through?

Where is the closest Drag Strip and how much does it cost and what requirements are there to run??

Where is everyone going crusing this weekend?

(p.s the Sr - Rb - Gt-r debate is stupid it is personal preferance to the owner and based on mods on any car it could be faster than yours, you might see a starlet going wizzing passed you one day only to relise it had a supra motor in it)

125hp shot of nos

willowbank raceway. $36. long sleeve shirt & pants & an approved helmet

city, touring the pubs ;)

This thred is turning into shit.

So to change the topic, What would be the best mod to do to a factory skyline beside a 3 inch exaust all the way through?

Where is the closest Drag Strip and how much does it cost and what requirements are there to run??

Where is everyone going crusing this weekend?

(p.s the Sr - Rb - Gt-r debate is stupid it is personal preferance to the owner and based on mods on any car it could be faster than yours, you might see a starlet going wizzing passed you one day only to relise it had a supra motor in it)

exactly noob.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...