Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

seriously, ive been planing on getting a non turbo r34 skyline, coupe, - dont know about youy guys but i dont just buy a car without knowing any backround knowlage, i really like to know the good points and the flaws of the car, factory faults, general details etc.. why is it that i can not find any detailed information on the non turbo r34 skyline.. am i not looking hard enough, or is just due the popularity of the turbo version.. when i had my vl commodore there were STACKSSSSS of sites which clearly described everything about the car.. is there a site like that for the n/a 34?

Hey mate,

Yeah I’ve got myself an NA R32 about 6 months ago and I totally agree with you, there wasn't a huge amount of knowledge about the NA's but having that said, they do have quite a bit in common with their turbo counterparts.

An R34 :jealousy:, I don't think there are too many problems with that model since they ironed out most of the bugs (such as r32 speedo's which often go astray, lol mines 20km out).

I asked a friend who had owned a 180sx and a s13 (he was a bit of a kid for his age lol) just for first impression stuff like,

1. Has it been in any accidents?

2. Is there any rust damage?

3. Does the motor start from cold without any weird noises?

4. Check under each wheel arch and the engine bay to check for damage

5. Knowledge of the previous owner (if possible)

6. How many km

7. Any leaking fluids?

8. Go for a drive and make sure there are no funny sounds coming from the engine, gear box, steering, clutch etc.

9. Get the RACV to check it out for you to make sure all the things you can't check by sight are ok ie: brakes, steering components.

In my case one of the seat belts didn't work and there were essential lights blown out everywhere (like indicators and stuff) which the RACV found, hence I made the dealer fix em' and convinced him to get the compliance (I was the first Aus owner).

In any case its a great idea to take a friend with a bit of know how,

Also I think there are a few threads around about "what to look for etc" that you can have a glance at.

All in all, its still a car, and many of the 'basic' things to check for would be very similar to other cars you have owned previously. You always take a risk when you buy a second hand car :), but that’s part of the thrill :)

Skylines are fantastic to drive and very easy to take care of (in my short experience anyway), plus there are plenty of spare parts floating around (just like the VL), and there is are shite load of people (on this website in particular) who really know there stuff when it comes to technical stuff, all you have to do is ask.

Good luck with it all mate,

Just don't be pushed to buy the first one ya see eh' lol

Regards Sean'O

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...