Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

can i use an r32 ecu in a r33 25t an have you take the maps on of the 33 an modfy them to suit and simply copy the vct stuff across ?

else if i just elect to drop the intake cam vct can i use a r32 ecu an have it remapped accordingly ?

Sorry, i have been meaning to get back to this thread but i have been very busy lately.

The R32 ecu does not have the hardware output to run the vct. You can make an r32 map to run an r33 but you lose vct control.

This seems to be a popular topic at the moment so i will get together all the info i have for r33 and put it up here sometime this week.

  • 2 weeks later...
Sorry, i have been meaning to get back to this thread but i have been very busy lately.

The R32 ecu does not have the hardware output to run the vct. You can make an r32 map to run an r33 but you lose vct control.

This seems to be a popular topic at the moment so i will get together all the info i have for r33 and put it up here sometime this week.

Hey there i was under the impression that you couldnt tune a stock r32 gtst ECU ,now my car has a idle problem and slight miss after changing just about everything at big costs i read a few threads and was told that my stock ECU might have issuse and that i might need to get it remaped ,this is the million dollar question how much and where or who could do this to help my ECU ?

  • 3 weeks later...

I would like to know how the timing relates between the CAS and the timing map.

What I mean is by timing on the cas is set to 15 BTDC and using my ecutalk it shows 15 deg at idle but as soon as it is revving it shows the timing from the computer map. I am running 18 degrees of timing from full boost to redline. how does this relate to the CAS. If i advance the timing on the CAS to 16 BTDC does this mean I will be running more timing at full boost?

Thankyou All

All it means is that if the map states 16degree's then the ecu places 1 degree advance into the overall ignition timing.

18degree's and it places 3degree's advance.

If your base ignition is out then the map ignition values won't be correct. i.e if your base cas ignition is 16degree's then the maps 18degree's will really be 19degree's.

So unless you are unable to manipulate the maps ignition table there's absolutely no point running out of spec ignition cas timing.

still some news on r33 stock ecu tuning would be nice.

Its a bitch to do because the R33 eprom that needs to be changed is a surface mount component. Its possible, its just a pain in the ass to do if you don't have the right equipment i.e. surface mount reflow station

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...