Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

read this awhiles back, the first live action was poo, but with the sort of GFX that are out now, this could be a really good thing, or a really bad thing. although even theyre animated movies are crap now, the animation is the worst ive ever seen. the only movie theyve made that was good was the 1992 Street Fighter II: The animated movie, was a great movie.

Damn, I can't go into this url at work.

can anyone give a rundown?

I personally think king of fighters is a better game than street fighter.

um to sum it up the story will revolve around chun li :)

when will they relise that the best characters are RYU and Ken and the only way it could be cool is if it was about them like in the 1992 film skyliva mentioned

the 1992 movie was good because it was original from the game storyline (if youve noticed, it has one) where ken turns evil and not ryu...

ive seen the KoF 4 episode anime and its pretty cool, some good fight scenes, they shouldve made a series for it, but they only made these four eps to advertise Maximum Impact 2.

if your talking about KoF Maximum Impact 1 & 2 being better than street fighter, you should stab your eyes out with a fork. they are the worst games ever. but i guess the old school KoF were alright.

this Live action could be interesting if they get the right characters, ryu and ken and akuma better be some awesome actors. and storyline better have some sort of tie in with the game and have absoloutly no connection the the 1994 live action film, the first live action had the shittest actors, and none of them could do anything special, they wasted all of the characters (like cammy, T. Hawk, Sagat, Vega, Dhalsim, blanka etc...) i wanna see some hadoukens and hurricane kicks and Shoryuken's etc...

Edited by SKYLVIA
read this awhiles back, the first live action was poo, but with the sort of GFX that are out now, this could be a really good thing, or a really bad thing. although even theyre animated movies are crap now, the animation is the worst ive ever seen. the only movie theyve made that was good was the 1992 Street Fighter II: The animated movie, was a great movie.

I second that

i was about to add that they should make a dead or alive movie... quickly realised oh yeah, they did. and what a tit fest it was! - actually i haven't seen it, but i can only hope it lived up to the game.

the DOA movie was fairly entertaining, didn't take itself too seriously at all which was good. I'm a pretty big fan of all the DOA games so I was pleasantly surprised by it. Not entirely accurate (A japanese ninja princess who lives in a chinese palace and speaks english? umwhat?) and they failed at casting kasumi. Devon Aoki :laugh: But all up it was a good popcorn and boobies fest :wave:

^^ it sure is, cant believe capcom havent learnt from it and made movies like it.

the DOA movie was fairly entertaining, didn't take itself too seriously at all which was good. I'm a pretty big fan of all the DOA games so I was pleasantly surprised by it. Not entirely accurate (A japanese ninja princess who lives in a chinese palace and speaks english? umwhat?) and they failed at casting kasumi. Devon Aoki ;) But all up it was a good popcorn and boobies fest :D

watched this today, and it was suprisingly entertaining, when i first saw the adds a whiles back with holly vallance i thought itd be shit, cause all shes ever been in is shit, but it was good, a more than generous amount of good camera angles and the action wasnt half bad either. kudos to them.

i dont play DOA, but i think everybody knows of the whole volleyball thing, was good to see they put that in the movie. are the characters in the movie from the game? or are the people in the movie completely random characters?

Edited by SKYLVIA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...