Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

East Bear will definately be pricey,.. but it's going to fit alot better than a cheaper alternative.

Wayne J; I know how it is being in two minds about LED tail lights, I've definately considered it, ... the stock ones do look a bit dated, but they will always look tough as,... whereas the LED's just look "pretty". :banana:

East Bear will definately be pricey,.. but it's going to fit alot better than a cheaper alternative.

Wayne J; I know how it is being in two minds about LED tail lights, I've definately considered it, ... the stock ones do look a bit dated, but they will always look tough as,... whereas the LED's just look "pretty". :)

True. Sometimes they're a little too "bling" for me, certain ones anyway.

My stock tailight lenses look a little dull/faded, as do the (rather useless) reversing lights.

I have some plastic polish and might try to revive them a little when I get the time.

Hey that reminds me - I've noticed that some 34's seem to have one reverse light clear and the other is red (or has a red globe)??? What's that about, anyone know?

Here's a perfect example:

Rear.sized.jpg

Cheers,

GTR's are ALL like that with the reversing light and the fog light.

Also, SOME GTTs had that,including mine, but I'm the only GTT I know that had this option. I think it was included in the "snow" kit on mountain cars which also includes heated side mirrors and heated windscreen wiper pads to keep the wipers from freezing onto the windows.

:)

GTR's are ALL like that with the reversing light and the fog light.

Also, SOME GTTs had that,including mine, but I'm the only GTT I know that had this option. I think it was included in the "snow" kit on mountain cars which also includes heated side mirrors and heated windscreen wiper pads to keep the wipers from freezing onto the windows.

:laugh:

Thanks Bass Junky for the explanation! :P

the fog light i remember someone saying a while ago was an optional for the GT-Ts.

Sheng/q looks good :( rims are a bit small though.

a cold day or something? Everyone in the background has their arms crossed.

My stock tailight lenses look a little dull/faded, as do the (rather useless) reversing lights.

I have some plastic polish and might try to revive them a little when I get the time.

I have one discoloured reverse light.

When I purchased my car, the only other GT-T in the lot had the same light (left hand side) discoloured, so I wondered if it was a common fault as in not sealed properly. It's quite annoying, however I havn't had the guts to do the whole baking in the oven, polishing, and resealing thing yet,.... I'm a newbie when it comes to DIY. I dread when the time comes where I'll have to polish up the headlights.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...