Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My r32 doesnt go to bad, its not level but the turbo doesnt get a full length on me, but the turbo i raced has a few probs to iron out, my cars got a 2.5ltr so yeah its a evenish comparision for the r33, mine a bit lighter though, got nfi what the power is though.

AFAIK, when Nissan released the R34 range they decided it was time to give the old RB series a bit of revamp - hence the introduction of the Neo Strait 6 engine. In addition to various other improvements the Neo engines got VVT, however the GTR's RB26DETT did not. (this may be the reason that Nissan can get away with quoting the official power output of the R34's RB25DET as 280PS & the the R34 GTR's RB26DETT at 280PS also!:mad:

I have seen 1, R33 series Skyline (late model) that had a Neo strait 6 engine in it - whether Nissan officially produced the R33 with the newer Neo's in it I can say - it could have been a conversion or something as simple as bolting on the "Neo" plastic engine cover...

Cheers

Dave

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

HPI has road tested an NA GTS25 against an NA Supra, their figures show 0-100 in 7.3 and 1/4 mile in 15.5 which is accurate in my case cos ive done my 0-100 in just under that time and the quarter sounds right. the car made 105 kw at the wheels, this is stocko with a muffler i think, pretty good i guess, id like 150 at the wheels on mine

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...