Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Um, eh?

The first number (before the W) indicates the oil viscosity when cold.

The second number indicates its viscosity when hot.

So mobil 1 5W50 viscosity is 105 centistokes at 40 degrees C & 17.5 centistokes at 100 degrees C. 0W40 equivalent numbers are 80 & 14. The hot end is more important because you can cook the oil in a GT-R quite easilly with no cooler. This is why a higher viscosity hot temperature property can be a good thing.

These are physical properties of the oil & don't refer to it's protection. For that you need look at different API ratings for the oils. I don't know what "the amount of protection - ie the protection of a 50W oil." means.

Try the Mobil website....

http://www.mobil.com/Australia-English/LCW...c_V_Mineral.asp

Is that you Richard?

How can the second number indicate the viscosity when hot? If that were the case, you're saying the viscosity becomes higher when it gets hot, ie it becomes thicker when it gets hot.

I'm pretty sure oil becomes less viscous when it's hot.

"the protection of a 50W oil" simply means a higher level of wear protection.

I may have confused the explanation, as I was just regurgetating what was written on the back of an oil container.

What I meant was a 5W50 is thinner than a 10W40 but offers higher protection from wear.

im using and have been using,Castrol Sport 5w30,for the past 2 oil changes.the bottle has the grey label on it.Its a top oil.this oil is fully synthetic and was designed to run in older model sports cars specifically skylines etc.

I was running penrite semi synthetic oil before.that to was pretty good.but not as good as the castrol full syn....It will be the first test at the track this month with this oil.its had a thrash at EC skid pan and wsid.now to hit the track and see how it performs.:D

"the protection of a 50W oil" simply means a higher level of wear protection.I may have confused the explanation, as I was just regurgetating what was written on the back of an oil container.What I meant was a 5W50 is thinner than a 10W40 but offers higher protection from wear

Thats why earlier on in the thread it was stated that the oil with the higher rating,for running hot "viscosity", is used at the track where the car cops a continual flogging.

And the lower rating is used for the street.

Ie: a higher rating is impractical for the street,as it will not offer the full protection of the 40w (which heats up quicker).simply because if there were a 60w in there it wouldnt be using the full thermal properties that a higher viscosity rating oil will offer thus the oil would be thicker,in turn inhibiting movement of rotating parts with the thicker oil.which could prolly lead to damage at an extreme.

Thats why synthetic oil rules over mineral.because of it's thermal properties and also its purity.

Correct me if im wrong here.

Is that you Richard?

How can the second number indicate the viscosity when hot? If that were the case, you're saying the viscosity becomes higher when it gets hot, ie it becomes thicker when it gets hot.

I'm pretty sure oil becomes less viscous when it's hot.

"the protection of a 50W oil" simply means a higher level of wear protection.

I may have confused the explanation, as I was just regurgetating what was written on the back of an oil container.

What I meant was a 5W50 is thinner than a 10W40 but offers higher protection from wear.

Yeah, thats me.

Not saying that at all.

There are two numbers. The winter number is on the LHS before the W & the summer number is on the RHS. That the RHS number is larger is not indicative of the viscosity being higher than the winter number. Almost all liguids lose viscosity as they get hotter, oil not least.

Please don't confuse viscosity with wear protection. They are not necessarily related.

Thats why earlier on in the thread it was stated that the oil with the higher rating,for running hot "viscosity", is used at the track where the car cops a continual flogging.

And the lower rating is used for the street.

Ie: a higher rating is impractical for the street,as it will not offer the full protection of the 40w (which heats up quicker).simply because if there were a 60w in there it wouldnt be using the full thermal properties that a higher viscosity rating oil will offer thus the oil would be thicker,in turn inhibiting movement of rotating parts with the thicker oil.which could prolly lead to damage at an extreme.

Thats why synthetic oil rules over mineral.because of it's thermal properties and also its purity.

Correct me if im wrong here.

Um, ok your wrong.

Oil does not jump from one viscosity to the next. It varies continuously with temperature (inversely as mentioned earlier). The difference between a (for example) 0W50 oil & a 5W40 oil at normal operating temps will be next to stuff all.

The viscosity of the oil is not indicative of its protective properties, but is indicative of its film thickness (to a degree). That a thicker oil is necessarily better is one of the enduring myths of motoring.

A higher viscosity oil will create more pumping losses within the motor - this is one reason car manufacturers are progressively lowered their oil viscosity ranges over the years.

The specific heat of the oil (ie how much energy is required to heat a certain amount a degree) is not strongly a function of viscosity. So a 40W oil doesn't heat any more quickly or slowly than a 60W oil. It will, however, be of a lower viscosity at any given temperature.

The viscosity rating is not indicative of an oil's ability to maintain its integrity at high tenperature.

The viscosity rating is not indicative of an oil's ability to maintain its integrity at high tenperature.

ahh kthn.

I thought that if the oil had a start temp rating of say 5W and a hot running rateing of 60W that the oil was good at cold start up and was able to flow more oil giving the parts good oil when needed.

And so what your saying is,that if the oil was say in a hot engine being thrashed,the 40W will maintain it's hot oils integrity the same as the 50W would be able to maintain itself under polognged use.

The average street car is never going to see that sort of abuse.

The viscosity of the oil is not indicative of its protective properties, but is indicative of its film thickness (to a degree). That a thicker oil is necessarily better is one of the enduring myths of motoring.

Thermal properties of the oil are directly related to the oils viscosity because temp will thin it out IE:The molecular structure of the oil is adversly changed when heated close to boiling.so it does have an affect.

Thats where wear and tear come into play.when the oil chosen for the engine is below or above the cars natural running viscosity.u choose the oil for what abuse you intend to have the engine put under.

put simply, all the first number means is that the oil can be pumped through your engine in as cold conditions as a single grade oil of the same first rating can be pumped.

the second number is the viscosity at 100degress, so a xW-30 is the same as a single grade 30 oil at 100degrees.

i dont really understand what your trying to say with the thrashing vs protection examples but both of those thickness ratings have little to do with protection.

you need an oil that provides flow that the engine was designed for at operating temperature so the second number is really what matters.

breakdown at high temperature and protection from metal to metal contact cannot be judged from the two numbers.. some thin oils offer better protection at high temperatures than thicker oils.

read these sites

http://www.vwtrendsweb.com/tech/0304vwt_sy...oils/index.html

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/

u can see the protection they offer from the charts with their specifications.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pressure when IDLING, is meant to be 51PSi... So that amperage value needs to go up a fair chunk... I'd personally be factoring for more like 12amp at least on those runs, and at that point you need to hope the already there wiring doesn't drop you a volt or two, as that's a lot of fuel pressure flow drop off from 13.5 to 12V! Taking idle pressure of 51psi, means the pump will be drawing a MINIMUM of 9amps all the time based on your reading of the graph (3bar base, then allowing an extra 0.5bar for boost = roughly 51psi)
    • Hi all,  I am in the market for an R200 longnose diff out of a Z31 300ZX, or S12 RSX, DR30 skyline, or similar, in a 3.9 ratio.  Preferably a late model one with the M12 crownwheel bolts.  The only easy to find advert for one of these was my ad back in 2007 when I sold it on this forum.  I sold the diff as I had sold the car it goes to, but as it turns out, after 18 years I got the car back late last year, so now I'm looking for the diff !  If anyone knows where to find a longnose R200 LSD with the M12 crownwheel bolts, drop me a line at [email protected] - Bonus paid if soomeone comes up with the original diff (stranger things have happened !).  Cheers   Ben D    
    • Hi everyone, I used to post here a bit from 2004-2013, when I owned various Nissans, in particular my S12 RSX gazelle, which was sold in 2007.  As luck would have it, after an 18 year hiatus, the car found its way back to me last year, and over the past 11 months I have had the pleasure of restoring it with my kids.  One thing that I am after in particular is a 3.9 ratio R200 LSD for it.  I actually sold the one out of the car here back in 2007 , and it would be incredible if I could track down who I sold it to, so I can see how they have progressed over the years (and to be honest, to see whether I can get the diff back !).  Anyways, hi all and let me know "where are the R200 Longnose diffs all at these days ?  Cheers Ben D  
    • Arms will be the same as the G35 or 350Z, but as above, there was a change in the lower control arm where it connects to the ball joint.  That said, you can remove the ball joint cone from your old ball joints and fit them to the new ball joints.  To be honest, I didn't think the ball joints themselves were different. The main ball joint is a bit awkward to replace, you really need to remove the steering knuckle to press out the old one.  Some people have used tools to remove it in place, but it just seemed too hard to get to. If you are going to press out/in that ball joint, then you may as well just replace the bushings in the LCA and the compression rod.  You can buy the compression rod bushing from Nissan, but the LCA bushes, you will need to go aftermarket. Much cheaper than buying the whole arm.
    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
×
×
  • Create New...