Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Um, eh?

The first number (before the W) indicates the oil viscosity when cold.

The second number indicates its viscosity when hot.

So mobil 1 5W50 viscosity is 105 centistokes at 40 degrees C & 17.5 centistokes at 100 degrees C. 0W40 equivalent numbers are 80 & 14. The hot end is more important because you can cook the oil in a GT-R quite easilly with no cooler. This is why a higher viscosity hot temperature property can be a good thing.

These are physical properties of the oil & don't refer to it's protection. For that you need look at different API ratings for the oils. I don't know what "the amount of protection - ie the protection of a 50W oil." means.

Try the Mobil website....

http://www.mobil.com/Australia-English/LCW...c_V_Mineral.asp

Is that you Richard?

How can the second number indicate the viscosity when hot? If that were the case, you're saying the viscosity becomes higher when it gets hot, ie it becomes thicker when it gets hot.

I'm pretty sure oil becomes less viscous when it's hot.

"the protection of a 50W oil" simply means a higher level of wear protection.

I may have confused the explanation, as I was just regurgetating what was written on the back of an oil container.

What I meant was a 5W50 is thinner than a 10W40 but offers higher protection from wear.

im using and have been using,Castrol Sport 5w30,for the past 2 oil changes.the bottle has the grey label on it.Its a top oil.this oil is fully synthetic and was designed to run in older model sports cars specifically skylines etc.

I was running penrite semi synthetic oil before.that to was pretty good.but not as good as the castrol full syn....It will be the first test at the track this month with this oil.its had a thrash at EC skid pan and wsid.now to hit the track and see how it performs.:D

"the protection of a 50W oil" simply means a higher level of wear protection.I may have confused the explanation, as I was just regurgetating what was written on the back of an oil container.What I meant was a 5W50 is thinner than a 10W40 but offers higher protection from wear

Thats why earlier on in the thread it was stated that the oil with the higher rating,for running hot "viscosity", is used at the track where the car cops a continual flogging.

And the lower rating is used for the street.

Ie: a higher rating is impractical for the street,as it will not offer the full protection of the 40w (which heats up quicker).simply because if there were a 60w in there it wouldnt be using the full thermal properties that a higher viscosity rating oil will offer thus the oil would be thicker,in turn inhibiting movement of rotating parts with the thicker oil.which could prolly lead to damage at an extreme.

Thats why synthetic oil rules over mineral.because of it's thermal properties and also its purity.

Correct me if im wrong here.

Is that you Richard?

How can the second number indicate the viscosity when hot? If that were the case, you're saying the viscosity becomes higher when it gets hot, ie it becomes thicker when it gets hot.

I'm pretty sure oil becomes less viscous when it's hot.

"the protection of a 50W oil" simply means a higher level of wear protection.

I may have confused the explanation, as I was just regurgetating what was written on the back of an oil container.

What I meant was a 5W50 is thinner than a 10W40 but offers higher protection from wear.

Yeah, thats me.

Not saying that at all.

There are two numbers. The winter number is on the LHS before the W & the summer number is on the RHS. That the RHS number is larger is not indicative of the viscosity being higher than the winter number. Almost all liguids lose viscosity as they get hotter, oil not least.

Please don't confuse viscosity with wear protection. They are not necessarily related.

Thats why earlier on in the thread it was stated that the oil with the higher rating,for running hot "viscosity", is used at the track where the car cops a continual flogging.

And the lower rating is used for the street.

Ie: a higher rating is impractical for the street,as it will not offer the full protection of the 40w (which heats up quicker).simply because if there were a 60w in there it wouldnt be using the full thermal properties that a higher viscosity rating oil will offer thus the oil would be thicker,in turn inhibiting movement of rotating parts with the thicker oil.which could prolly lead to damage at an extreme.

Thats why synthetic oil rules over mineral.because of it's thermal properties and also its purity.

Correct me if im wrong here.

Um, ok your wrong.

Oil does not jump from one viscosity to the next. It varies continuously with temperature (inversely as mentioned earlier). The difference between a (for example) 0W50 oil & a 5W40 oil at normal operating temps will be next to stuff all.

The viscosity of the oil is not indicative of its protective properties, but is indicative of its film thickness (to a degree). That a thicker oil is necessarily better is one of the enduring myths of motoring.

A higher viscosity oil will create more pumping losses within the motor - this is one reason car manufacturers are progressively lowered their oil viscosity ranges over the years.

The specific heat of the oil (ie how much energy is required to heat a certain amount a degree) is not strongly a function of viscosity. So a 40W oil doesn't heat any more quickly or slowly than a 60W oil. It will, however, be of a lower viscosity at any given temperature.

The viscosity rating is not indicative of an oil's ability to maintain its integrity at high tenperature.

The viscosity rating is not indicative of an oil's ability to maintain its integrity at high tenperature.

ahh kthn.

I thought that if the oil had a start temp rating of say 5W and a hot running rateing of 60W that the oil was good at cold start up and was able to flow more oil giving the parts good oil when needed.

And so what your saying is,that if the oil was say in a hot engine being thrashed,the 40W will maintain it's hot oils integrity the same as the 50W would be able to maintain itself under polognged use.

The average street car is never going to see that sort of abuse.

The viscosity of the oil is not indicative of its protective properties, but is indicative of its film thickness (to a degree). That a thicker oil is necessarily better is one of the enduring myths of motoring.

Thermal properties of the oil are directly related to the oils viscosity because temp will thin it out IE:The molecular structure of the oil is adversly changed when heated close to boiling.so it does have an affect.

Thats where wear and tear come into play.when the oil chosen for the engine is below or above the cars natural running viscosity.u choose the oil for what abuse you intend to have the engine put under.

put simply, all the first number means is that the oil can be pumped through your engine in as cold conditions as a single grade oil of the same first rating can be pumped.

the second number is the viscosity at 100degress, so a xW-30 is the same as a single grade 30 oil at 100degrees.

i dont really understand what your trying to say with the thrashing vs protection examples but both of those thickness ratings have little to do with protection.

you need an oil that provides flow that the engine was designed for at operating temperature so the second number is really what matters.

breakdown at high temperature and protection from metal to metal contact cannot be judged from the two numbers.. some thin oils offer better protection at high temperatures than thicker oils.

read these sites

http://www.vwtrendsweb.com/tech/0304vwt_sy...oils/index.html

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/

u can see the protection they offer from the charts with their specifications.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...