Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just like the Getaway in Stockholm movie series "Ghost Rider - The Final Ride' was released (i think) november last year.

Only it is filmed in the middle of the day through Sweden - Stockholm.

It is 10 times better than any of the Getaway in Stockholm movies and definately worth watching.

Check out the official site here:

http://www.ghostridermovie.net/

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14887-ghost-rider-the-final-ride/
Share on other sites

As im still blowing my load after seeing this movie yesterday, here is a brief description.

It contains about 6 movies with the "Ghost Rider's" on board video camera on his bike. He/she usually has a few cameras on the bike and several location cameras to help capture the footage.

The Ghost Rider basically toys with the police - speeds past them on one wheel, burnouts etc.

Two of the runs are basically the Ghost Rider going through heavy traffic at speed up to 300. (Averages 270km/hr).

Enough said.... start downloading it now.

yeah i downloaded that a few months ago

pretty good

not much too it though

just some idiot doing 300km/h through traffic

the new tekademics vids are out soon, not sure if someone has already posted

http://www.dtmxchange.com/playersrun.mpg

http://www.dtmxchange.com/destroypreview.mpg

http://shell-0.anet.com/~qc/gumballfl.wmv

enjoy

Wow.. Some effort is required. Converting to VCD so my gear can handle it (DVD player doesn't have SVCD support, entertainment box doesn't have mpeg2 decoder, and my normal box displays it in the wrong aspect ratio)... Not bad getting faster than double real-time mpeg encoding in pure software though :rolleyes: Dualies rock!

Bah, VCD sux arse. And since I can't play SVCD, I'll have to go straight to DVD :P Anyway, I think I have all the authoring bugs out now... Just need to finish compiling and the burn it for testing... Heh, Ghost Rider, Getaway in Stockholm 1, 2, and 3, Getaway in Paris, and a music video with cars crashing...

If it turns out OK, I might make a couple of copies.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...