Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

For sale is my r32 GTR twin turbo i have put a arm and a leg into this car and never got to take it to the track or even got a taste of the real boost the last thing i will be doing is putting it on dyna before sale for i have a baby on the way and already have a 3 year old, sad but true i have to say goodby to my baby,no not that one my car.have a look and see what you think i am open to offers or trade with cash.

Here are some of the after market parts i have had installed!!!!

- after market computer $$

- trust frontmount/big intercooler$$

- piping to pods by apexi$$$only set in australia/rare

- power fc\dual stage boostcontroller by HKS$$

- suspension by HKS/adjustable in many ways$$

- exhaust full 3and half inch all the way with tip$$

- 2 blow off valves by apexi$$

- apexi pods$$

- apexi handcontroller$$

- tuffest clutch i could get my hands on they told me nothing would brake this$$

- momo steering wheel$

- front swaybar$

above cost easily brake the 10k budget even 15k!!!

I made some changes to the look of the car sick of the gtr look

-installed frontbar as you can see in photos gives it a sexier look

-stock side skirts

-rearpods

-removed the wing and debadged boot/also known as the sleeper affect

makes it very easy on the eye well my eye i dont like wings.

-also installed are a set of aftermarket zenon lights so at night you have the brightest lights/set when i got them easily go for 2k

That about sums it up for upgrades other then that i have never had a problem with the car i have had the gtr for about 2 years. Still get that mad feeling in the gut everytime im neer it. i really dont want to sell but in my situation i have no choice at all i had more plans for the car but they had to come to a halt,my next plan was to install what i call a bird catcher is the gt45 t88 turbo top mounted with stainless manifold internal gated or ex, well the car has everything else why not bigger turbo sad i will never get to see that.

Anyway i have a price tag of 21000$ on her

will consider trade with cash or nearest offer

here is my number if anybody is interested

0427497111

thanks,

neal

my lil couson calls it the bat mobile.

post-23137-1167785062.jpg

post-23137-1167785123.jpg

post-23137-1167785172.jpg

post-23137-1167785208.jpg

post-23137-1167785244.jpg

Edited by neal32

its a late 89model as you should know they didnt release till 1990

only has 60000k's is getting a full tune before sale includes dyna.

the car is currently at a yard in the city so if you tell them the price ive said they will understand you know caryards. if you would like to veiw or test drive the vehicle give me a call and i will let them know what day and time couse they will have to move cars to get it on the road for a testy.

thanks,

neal

ph:0427497111

email [email protected]

Edited by neal32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...