Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ey,

i got a mate that suggested i put bigger injectors in my rb20. At the moment i got std injectors, with highflowed r33 turbo, front mount, fuel reg, fuel exhaust system, pod filter. Im planning to replace the std ecu with microtech in the next 3-4weeks. IS it a big difference with bigger injectors? if so....in wat way? and if 800cc are too big...hopw big should i go?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150329-sard-800cc-twin-jets/
Share on other sites

Im in the same boat but with an RB25DET.. I'm getting a highflow turbo, FMIC, Walbro pump and Haltech ECU fitted soon and was wondering wether to put a fuel pressure reg or get larger injectors.... $250 Vs $900 :( few tuners said the highflow turbo would max at 240 - 250 rw/kw which the stock injectors with rising rate FPR have achieved on some R33's at 90% duty...

Cheers

With larger injectors and larger fuel pump, the standard fuel rail pressure will be fine... theres no need for an after market FPR. You only need a rising rate FPR when the injectors are closing to their max duty... 800cc's are good enough for approx 800hp... 550cc will be a better option cause they will be easier to tune...

Edited by QRI05E

Probably GTR injectors + FPR would be your best bet... 480cc and i "think" they are direct drop in cause both the RB20 and RB26 are both top feed if im not mistaken?

Otherwise Nismo 550cc will more then enough and you wont need a rising rate FPR

Cheers

Edited by QRI05E

Well once you tune the ECU, any size injectors can be used for example at 250rw/kw the Nismo 550cc might reach a duty cycle of 65% where the Nismo 800cc wil only reach 50%. But this also means the larger the injector the harder it is to tune therefore you should only ever get injectors to match your power goal...

250rw/kw = 550cc max otherwise would be overkill

GTR injectors are 480cc so theoretically will support 480hp (80% duty) at the fly wheel. Therefore 480hp - 30% (drive train loss) = 336rw/hp = 250.56rw/kw (80% duty)

Hope this helps

Regards,

Sarkis

For a max power of 250rw/kw, Yes 800cc are an overkill... Dont get me wrong, they will still work fine but wont be utilized as well as the 550cc in other words you wont be using them to their intended potential...

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...