Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What's that weird motor noise I get with my portable CD player?

[JSC]

======================================================================

Many people report problems while playing CDs from a portable CD player

into their car audio systems. The problem, stated very simply, has to

do with the stepping of the motor requiring a varying amount of current

and non-isolated power and audio signal grounds. Using a liberal

application of capacitors and inductors, this voltage variance can be

restricted to a window of 8.990 to 9.005V for a 9V CD player, yet even

the swing between these two levels is enough to cause annoyingly loud

noise on the outputs. It has been reported that this entire problem

can be solved by using a true DC-DC inverter at the power input to the

CD player.

So the stepping in the motor that pushes the laser around or the motor that varies the spin speed of the disc draws various amounts of current.

My motor or alternator whine noise happens when I listen to the radio too.

I also beleive this only happens to people who run RCA cables to an amp? That's when mine did it, anyway.

Edited by RANDY

Tried that too. Tried running the RCA's completely out of the car, then into the boot. No change.

Earthing the RCA's helped about 50% at the time. You just run a wire from the outer contact to somewhere metal on the car. It got rid of the noise quite a bit, but it was still there.

The noise apparently comes in when either the HU or the amp isn't grounding the negative part of the RCA cable properly. These cables carry 2v or more in them, so plugging them in and out while everything is powered up can kill the grounding fuse or track in either your HU, amp, or both!

I opened my HU when I had this problem, and found the ground track was burnt through. I bridged it with some wire, tested with a multimeter and put it back in. No change at all. I suspect it's blown somewhere else too.

  • 2 weeks later...

I've also got this problem & part of my trouble I believe is the stupid installers set the amp up with the rear speaker RCA connections to the amp jammed under the fuel pump relay. I have to rotate my amp the other way around, this will probably cure half my problem. But they also have not grounded the RCA's at the amp, so they had NFI (COMPLETE AUDIO U SUCK!)

grounding is always the problem here. it is caused from the wrong resistance termination on a end of line. for example i have no issues running cd or radio tuner. however i have a AUX which goes to a stereo lead so i can plug in ipods, phones etc to listen to music. because this line doesnt have a EOL resistance on it it humms with the alternator due to incorrect ground loop. easiest way to fix is u can get filters from a audio shop which u put at the speaker to filter out noise on ur grounding wire. just cut ur negative wire at the speaker and put it in just before the speaker. a capacitor would probably work as well assuming its big enough and doesnt explode. safer to get a proper kit from somewhere like jaycar.

grounding is always the problem here. it is caused from the wrong resistance termination on a end of line. for example i have no issues running cd or radio tuner. however i have a AUX which goes to a stereo lead so i can plug in ipods, phones etc to listen to music. because this line doesnt have a EOL resistance on it it humms with the alternator due to incorrect ground loop. easiest way to fix is u can get filters from a audio shop which u put at the speaker to filter out noise on ur grounding wire. just cut ur negative wire at the speaker and put it in just before the speaker. a capacitor would probably work as well assuming its big enough and doesnt explode. safer to get a proper kit from somewhere like jaycar.

Installing filter caps on the speaker wires is an absolute last resort as this will also affect the sounds of the audio, & not really a solution to a problem that shouldn't be there. If your problem is on the input to the head unit then that's where it has to be fixed. You may need to change your lead set up on your auxillary to cure you're issues.

The problem with my set up, is that the RCA cables have got a ground wire that's meant to be connected at the head unit & the amp & it hasn't been done, so the input to the amp is effectively floating, doesn't have the same ground reference as the head unit & therefore highly susceptable to interfearance. Getting it away from the bloody fuel pump relay will also help in my case.

Edited by JazzaR33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...