blk180 Posted January 19, 2007 Share Posted January 19, 2007 There are a few GTSS graphs in the RB26 turbo upgrade sticky if you havent checked there. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2835949 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Keets Posted January 19, 2007 Share Posted January 19, 2007 David-Gutted to read the Bentley thread...horrible luck As for the sump baffle; from what i'm told its an engine out exercise best left for a rebuild occasion. When I brought that idea up last year the consensus was run my RB with an extra litre or so of oil..I use redline just incase anyway. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836003 Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrxhoon Posted January 19, 2007 Share Posted January 19, 2007 . However dyno figures can give an indication of when the turbos come on boost which is what I'm interested inI'm not even sure that you can do that. I get full boost (1.1 bar) in my car at around 3800 on the higher 3 gears but don't forget I have a 34 engine and very healthy one as well. Sory to hear all your misfortunes.. Have you had a full check up on your engine? ( the one the turbo let go ) If not, if I was you I would do a full compression test and a leakdown before doing any mods to it . These engines have a bad habit of sucking turbo ceramic dust back in them. When it happened to me a few years back no-one believed me but its happened to a few people here and now there are a lot more believers... This is what could have happened to yours ( but i hope not). This is extreme as you can see the 3 pistons ( rear turbo let go so rear 3) are totally stuffed , the bore was the same and it was embebbed in the cyl head as well. The effected 3 cyls had very low compression( around 50-90) the other 3 had normal comp but were still effected ( very fine marks though). Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836067 Share on other sites More sharing options...
writeoff Posted January 19, 2007 Author Share Posted January 19, 2007 (edited) As for the sump baffle; from what i'm told its an engine out exercise best left for a rebuild occasion. When I brought that idea up last year the consensus was run my RB with an extra litre or so of oil..I use redline just incase anyway. Thanks for the tip. I hadn't thought that far in advance. Have you had a full check up on your engine? ( the one the turbo let go ) If not, if I was you I would do a full compression test and a leakdown before doing any mods to it. I've had a leakdown test performed. I can't remember the exact results off hand but IIRC there was 5% variance between all 6 cylinders ie 5% difference between highest to lowest figures. I'll post the exact results when I grab the sheet. Ugly photos you have there. That must have hurt (both the car and your wallet). Thanks to both Mr Keats and wrxhoon for your comments regarding the Bentley. Edited January 19, 2007 by writeoff Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836411 Share on other sites More sharing options...
R31Nismoid Posted January 19, 2007 Share Posted January 19, 2007 the grey GTR has a blown turbo (hense the upgrade), I would be having the motor inspected, if a turbo has let go, then its possible there is some motor damage. Also, you do know you really dont "need" the sump baffles ye? The whole hype surrounding the need is pretty much that, hype. Hardly any GTR's here in Melb run anything other than a stock sump well into the 300rwkw range, all circuit raced/motorkhana etc etc. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836478 Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrxhoon Posted January 19, 2007 Share Posted January 19, 2007 [. I've had a leakdown test performed. I can't remember the exact results off hand but IIRC there was 5% variance between all 6 cylinders ie 5% difference between highest to lowest figures. I'll post the exact results when I grab the sheet. Ugly photos you have there. That must have hurt (both the car and your wallet). Was it a leakdown or compression test? Compression is quoted in either PSI or bar and you want as little variance as possible however a max of about 14 PSI . Leakdown is quoted in % and you want as little as possible ( less than 5% is very good) . It did hurt because someone else was driving the car so I didnt even get the pleasure of blowing it up myself. I only got the pain of rebuilding it, I had to change everything . Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836526 Share on other sites More sharing options...
gun32gtr Posted January 19, 2007 Share Posted January 19, 2007 [.Was it a leakdown or compression test? Compression is quoted in either PSI or bar and you want as little variance as possible however a max of about 14 PSI . Leakdown is quoted in % and you want as little as possible ( less than 5% is very good) . It did hurt because someone else was driving the car so I didnt even get the pleasure of blowing it up myself. I only got the pain of rebuilding it, I had to change everything . yeh thats why no longer let others drive my car now,read it couple times now and thought not worth..even tho id have to fix anyways.. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836621 Share on other sites More sharing options...
writeoff Posted January 19, 2007 Author Share Posted January 19, 2007 Also, you do know you really dont "need" the sump baffles ye? I've deleted the sump from my list. Thanks for the advice. Was it a leakdown or compression test? Compression is quoted in either PSI or bar and you want as little variance as possible however a max of about 14 PSI . Leakdown is quoted in % and you want as little as possible ( less than 5% is very good) . It was a leakdown test. From memory the best figure was 7% and the worst was 12%. A quick question: Are the Sard 700cc injectors a direct fit (as I believe) or do they need injector collars? http://www.nengun.com/sard/injectors Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836626 Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrxhoon Posted January 19, 2007 Share Posted January 19, 2007 A quick question: Are the Sard 700cc injectors a direct fit (as I believe) or do they need injector collars? Yes , direct and the plugs fit, unlike the 800ccs, they can be a little tight in to the fuel rail but a little rubber grease makes them go in nice. I would use new O rings and new collars but I use the old spacers if they look OK. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836731 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiper the Fox Posted January 19, 2007 Share Posted January 19, 2007 Yes , direct and the plugs fit, unlike the 800ccs, they can be a little tight in to the fuel rail but a little rubber grease makes them go in nice.I would use new O rings and new collars but I use the old spacers if they look OK. A slightly thinner o'ring does the trick nicely...don't forget to give them a light spray with silicone during assembly. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152224-question-on-pon-cams/page/2/#findComment-2836753 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now