Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

would the n1 headlights for the r32 have the same wiring as the normal r32?

has anyone tried this?

I can't confirm - so a bit useless really, but I would imagine it's exactly the same plug. If it isn't it'd be a relatively easy re-wire. If I had to bet my money would be on the same plug (knowing Nissan of the era).

whats the difference between the n1 headlight and standard gtst headlights?

N1 lights look aggressive as all hell. My dream r32 wouldn't be complete without them, they have a squarer looking section, kind of like the difference between Aus spec r31 lights and JDM r31 projector lights.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152402-n1-headlgihts/#findComment-2835732
Share on other sites

n1 use h4 as the main headlight...whilst the stock ones use i think h1 or h3 cant rem. As with wiring from memory....might have to change to H4 plug. Can check if your really desparte to know. pm me

when you unplug the H3C light, dont unplug it from the globe. There is another plug that leads to the highbeams so both low and high beams share the same plug leading to the main loom. So unplug it from there...its considerably bigger. You end up using that bigger plug to connect to the hi/low H4 in the N1 headlight. Parkers use the same plug. And then there is that extra plug that will be tucked away (somewhere towards the grill). It wont be plugged into anything, and thats the one you will use for the fog/driving lights

Edited by [WLDCRD]
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152402-n1-headlgihts/#findComment-2837739
Share on other sites

far out, here i was thinking.......the above pic was GTR headlights, and the bottom pic was standard GTST, i had both on my 32, wired exactly the same, i just plugged em in, got some really bright white H4 lamps and bingo, she work and light street

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152402-n1-headlgihts/#findComment-2838076
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...