Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For most 'normal' people, a three inch does all that it is supposed to (less restriction). Anything bigger is for show or really, really high horse power applications (you do actually need some backpressure to run smoothly/properly for anything remotely like daily driving).

Forced induction cars don't need backpressure anywhere near as much as NA cars. Because the turbo forces more than 1 atmosphere of pressure into the cylinder, it's pretty well "sucked" out by the lower pressure atmosphere behind it.

It's also the main reason why extractors are more suited to NA cars. Not really because NA cars have more to gain from the extractors, but because turbo cars have less to lose from an inefficient exhaust manifold design.

I think 4" dump would be too big for a normal street-driven GTS-t and sap a little performance, but I think the same pipe would absolutely kill the performance of any normal NA car.

You cant have too little back pressure. Think about this, people spend alot of time and money getting the air in and OUT of the head as easily and quickly as possible - head porting, heat wrapping, etc - all designed to get the air out quicker. Back pressure will not help this, it will fight it, it will retain heat in the cylinders. What possible good does it do in the pursuit of hp????

The cat is a BIG restriction to the flow of the exhaust. If you ever get the chance have a look inside one - its scary.

I read a post by Sydneykid where he flow tested a 3" (or was it 2.5" - Sydneykid) pipe, and found no restriction to air flow up to around 600hp air flow (help again Sydneykid!) or more.

Another thing to consider is what mufflers/resonators are fitted to the exhaust. I originally fitted an N1 style exhaust - very loud but made boost very quickly and gave a good power increase.

I then changed to a Nismo exhaust with 1 muffler and 1 resonator and I noticed the car slowed down, and made boost later. Both systems were 3". Sorry I can't back this up with dyno figures.

My personal advice would be to get the biggest diameter, least restrictive exhaust that you can - it cant hurt! Then fit the highest flow cat you can find;) you'll love it.

The design of the exhaust is as tricky as you make it.

The most forgotten dimension by exhaust upgraders is the 'thermal' one (and it relates directly to exhaust gas speed). At the start of the turbo exit the gases have incredible heat (and therefore speed and pressure) ,as the gasses travel back the speed of the gas reduces as its energy is lost to the pipe and radiated as heat.

Here is where it gets hard. The cooler gases are best not put through overly large pipes as it can increase turbulence but, smaller pipes have a larger surface area to volume ratio to lose heat through!

In practice I have found that the largest diameter should be at the start of the turbine outlet, any larger and you create unnecessary turbulence. Factory turbo --- 3inch from memory. Think 'match porting' at this stage.

Next the cat needs to be as close to the turbo as is practical, better still lets forget you have one (they kill power).

The first 3inch muffler needs to be nice and close to the dump pipe and filled with stainless packing (fibreglass will usually die and turn the muffler into a marracca) Exhaust places directing you to fibreglass mufflers will never place a muffler very close to the dump for this reason.

The second muffler before the diff @ 2 1/2 inch and 2 1/4 over the diff into a slight megaphone shaped tail pipe that tappers gradually out to 4inches.

Wrap the dump pipe to the first muffler or cat (which has been ceramic coated) in heat tape. If you have the money coat or wrap the entire exhaust.

If you tell people to reduce exhaust pipe diameter as you go back on a street car exhaust , they look at you funny and think your a loon.No it's not about backpressure, it's about retaining a low pressure 'trail' all the way back to the tail pipe. Hi I'm certified ! :P

I forgot to mention that the design is one that goes from 'hot' to 'cold' front to back and as that relates to high pressure to low pressure your home and hosed.

Then again if you can trap all the heat in then a uniform diameter of 3 inches all the way is the shot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...