Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some interesting reding on the ECU poll thread so while there is plenty of info coming out and not wanting to hi jack the other thread i thought id start my own.

I'm currently running a PFC and for my next build was going to a Djetro. But i plan to run nitrous for the drags. Now there are some real nice nitrous controllers getting around these days. you can program what rpm to start injection, what gears to inject and how much to inject which can be progessively increased or decreased as rpm climb / fall. even a burn out mode.

Problem is you buying bascially a complete 2nd ECU just to control nitrous. i realise you dont have to run a nitrous controller but i think it certainly makes sense to, to get the biggest advantages with it and for engine safety.

I've had a look at the Wolf software, there are certainly plenty of options for tuning. Is the Wolff able to control nitrous injection in the same way a nitrous controller can?

The Wolf also is handy in that you can store more than one tune and seems easy enough to switch between them, so ideal for having a street tune and a strip tune stored in its memory.

Any tuners out there with experience tuning nitrous on GTR's? What's your advice on ECU? should i go with the D jetro and nitrous controller or go to a Wolf or Motec to do both?

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/
Share on other sites

It really comes down to how much you want to spend. On the cheap end of things is the PFC D-Jetro with a nitrous controller. Mid range might be Autronic which im pretty sure can handle nitrous and has features like antilag, rot idle etc. Where if you want to step up you grab a motec. What id be looking at is the new HKS F-CON V Pro ecu Xspeed now offer. I had a long chat with ant about this ecu at motorvation and he says its pretty much inline with motec and autronic in regards to tuneability and features, but without the heafty pricetage. It also controls nitrous too. Best thing to do would be to give them a call and work something out with them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2848074
Share on other sites

you are seriously limiting your tuner options though if you go with the fcon , because afaik only authorised hks dealers can tune it of which there arent many

any autoronic/wolf/motec level ecu with stack of assignable and configurable outputs would be able to do n2o

but dont under estimate djetro and controller , you still have all the advantages of the power fc . cheap , plug and play (almost for the djetro) stock ide , stock ac , by far the widest support etc etc etc

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2848140
Share on other sites

the F Con Pro does sound appealling but only because most of the rest of the engine will be HKS. But there doesn't seem to be alot of people using it at the moment so no real feed back on how good it is except from the dealler. Maybe i'll leave the ECU choice till one of the last things to get, over the next 12 months there should be more cars out there using the F Con.

The D Jetro is obviously well proven to i'd feel real comfortable using it along with a Nitrous controller. If the F Con plug and play or require a re wire of the loom?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2850951
Share on other sites

d jetro is good and is suitable to make good power relatively easy, wolf is also good and steve at top racing knows his stuff.

My gtr suitable to make 600rwhp with nos will be using d jetro and I have used wolf in my other turbo applications

I think ant's car from xpseed was running 10's using a wolf

Edited by monga
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2851493
Share on other sites

The Wolf V500 can totally control NOS and the other adavantage is it runs a dedicated tune for NOS -Turn on and of at any revs and load(of before rev limiter to stop damage)and different fuel and ign MAP,something NOS must have,and safe guards like low bottle-fuel presssure over ride.The Wolf changes over on the fly with no delay.

Ive been teaching more tuners to use it so there is more options for tuning. www.wolfems.com.au Look at the functions.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2854468
Share on other sites

Cheers Guys,

the Wolf is sounding better all the time. NIB where abouts are you located, i wouldn't mind popping in and saying g'day sometime.

NIB works at

top racing

8 savill place carlisle

94702222

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2854614
Share on other sites

thnaks again guys.

i'm hoping to finish my build by the end of the year. and it will be finished with everything i want so i guess once it's tuned right at that time it shouldn't need turning again very often.

I assume there are enough outputs on the wolf to also control water methonol injection as well as nitrous. keen on giving this ago also. planning to run 2 bar of boost but would like to run water injection to gain some extra timing on for example anything over 1.5 bar.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2854696
Share on other sites

Public Enemy, Do some better research before commiting to an ecu.

I have found With wolfs you can only go to one shop to get them tuned. no one else in wa wants to tune them, (nib maybe teach people about them but do you want someone learning on your car.)

From what i have seen wolfs have starting problems, and seen at motorvation with the white r31, also the tunes some of the tunes i have seen are questionable, 13.5 afr hmmm, either that or the wolf changes its tune all by itself.

if i was to do it i would go a power fc d-jetro, easy to get tuned, everyone knows them. no starting issues, the dont change there tunes and they seem to be the going ecu for quick cars in wa, aust and the japan.

or the F Con Vpro seems good, most crazy jap gtr's run this setup.

Edited by B0BB0
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2858410
Share on other sites

Public Enemy, Do some better research before commiting to an ecu.

I have found With wolfs you can only go to one shop to get them tuned. no one else in wa wants to tune them, (nib maybe teach people about them but do you want someone learning on your car.)

From what i have seen wolfs have starting problems, and seen at motorvation with the white r31, also the tunes some of the tunes i have seen are questionable, 13.5 afr hmmm, either that or the wolf changes its tune all by itself.

if i was to do it i would go a power fc d-jetro, easy to get tuned, everyone knows them. no starting issues, the dont change there tunes and they seem to be the going ecu for quick cars in wa, aust and the japan.

or the F Con Vpro seems good, most crazy jap gtr's run this setup.

You just contradicted yourself, there is only one place that tunes F Con, so whats the difference?

And are you knocking the ECU or some of the ppl that tune them?

if it was a Power FC the tune would be good, is that what your saying? thats how your coming across.

Find the ecu that suits your needs and does what you need, and find a good tuner that supports it (and Wolf is supported, a good tuner can tune any ecu. )

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153080-best-ecu-for-me/#findComment-2861091
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...