Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok well there is the first problem

if the boost display isnt correct then you have very little hope of controlling it correctly, other than guesstimation. what is the part no# on the map sensor?

it sounds like you may have a different rated map sensor

Paul

I will look tonight, but if i remember i couldnt locate the part number. I'll check. When i initially hooked it up, i had no problems, at least i could control boost so that part doesnt particularly worry me.

It does come with the kit, i got my kit 2nd hand with my PFC and it didnt come with it

Ahhh i thought so, thanks for clearing that up,also does the power fc boost controll solenoid plug straight into the gts25t standard boost controll solenoid wiring loom?

Cheers mate

Ahhh i thought so, thanks for clearing that up,also does the power fc boost controll solenoid plug straight into the gts25t standard boost controll solenoid wiring loom?

Cheers mate

no you have to cut and solder.

maybe back the front?

Tried reversing the NO line, wastegate didnt even open so plumbed it back.

I guess its the solenoid

Hey,

edit: strangeness! if you connected to the other port, you should have had exact reversal of previous

behaviour - with BCK enabled, should have been running on spring pressure; with it disabled, should

have been "unlimited" boost. Anyway...

At least you're making progress :)

Put a multimeter that can measure duty-cycle on the solenoid, and see whether it's being told to open or not.

At this point it doesn't _sound_ like the solenoid to me - when you have it enabled, it's closed; and when you have

it disabled, it's open. Sounds like the solenoid's working fine, but the controller's not telling it to open ... the

meter will tell you for sure though.

Regards,

Saliya

Edited by saliya
Hey,

edit: strangeness! if you connected to the other port, you should have had exact reversal of previous

behaviour - with BCK enabled, should have been running on spring pressure; with it disabled, should

have been "unlimited" boost. Anyway...

At least you're making progress :glare:

Put a multimeter that can measure duty-cycle on the solenoid, and see whether it's being told to open or not.

At this point it doesn't _sound_ like the solenoid to me - when you have it enabled, it's closed; and when you have

it disabled, it's open. Sounds like the solenoid's working fine, but the controller's not telling it to open ... the

meter will tell you for sure though.

Regards,

Saliya

Thats what i am thinking , the controller isnt telling the solenoid to open, coz the solenoid is opening. Also, something i noticed on my controller, Settings, Boost, no.2 the last digits are 201 instead of 255, all the rest are 255. Is this normal??

Cheers

Thats what i am thinking , the controller isnt telling the solenoid to open, coz the solenoid is opening. Also, something i noticed on my controller, Settings, Boost, no.2 the last digits are 201 instead of 255, all the rest are 255. Is this normal??

Cheers

Pretty sure that's the "learning" part; _exactly_ what the number means I don't know; but when you change

the duty cycle it goes to 255 again. A number that's not 255 is perfectly normal as far as I know.

If I had to guess I'd say it's "attack" - and that it self-adjusts so that you approach target boost as fast as

possible without hitting the boost cut - but I don't know :P

Regards,

Saliya

i just dont see how the boost control kit would work if the boost reading youve set to be desired and duty control, but the boost control the PFC is seeing is way off

like if you set the target boost to be 1.2bar at 80 duty cycle thats fine

but if the map sensor signal is wacko and it only ever see's say 0.30bar cos its wrong, then it has little hope of working, or at least i dont see how?

i just dont see how the boost control kit would work if the boost reading youve set to be desired and duty control, but the boost control the PFC is seeing is way off

like if you set the target boost to be 1.2bar at 80 duty cycle thats fine

but if the map sensor signal is wacko and it only ever see's say 0.30bar cos its wrong, then it has little hope of working, or at least i dont see how?

Hey,

if the MAP sensor's reading 0.5kg/cm2 and you set target to 0.5 (and it's _really_ 'something else') don't see how that would

be a problem - after all, it doesn't really care _what_ the number is, only how close to (or far away) you are from it...

I'm pretty sure he's "aiming" at the sensor reading (like if the sensor reads 0.5, but that's really 1, and he really wants 1, then

he programs 0.5...)

The only time this would be a problem that I can see is in terms of resolution (like if 0.1 == 1, then an 0.2 overboost is actually

3 instead of 1.2); or in terms of minimums (say it reads 0.3 @ 1; you can't dial up 0.3 as a target if you want 1)

Regards,

Saliya

Hey,

if the MAP sensor's reading 0.5kg/cm2 and you set target to 0.5 (and it's _really_ 'something else') don't see how that would

be a problem - after all, it doesn't really care _what_ the number is, only how close to (or far away) you are from it...

I'm pretty sure he's "aiming" at the sensor reading (like if the sensor reads 0.5, but that's really 1, and he really wants 1, then

he programs 0.5...)

The only time this would be a problem that I can see is in terms of resolution (like if 0.1 == 1, then an 0.2 overboost is actually

3 instead of 1.2); or in terms of minimums (say it reads 0.3 @ 1; you can't dial up 0.3 as a target if you want 1)

Regards,

Saliya

Saliya

Exactly, previously i was able to set my boost aruond the wrong reading and didnt particularly worry me.

Well ive given up, the solenoid has power there, i cant hear it move, so i am thinking it maybe my PFC which cannot adjust anything to it. Going to get rid of it and try a cheap boost valve.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...