Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hay everyonehow r u all. ive got a question about my r32 gtst skyline. the boost guage in the dash only works in quarter scale deflection. so on idle it tells me im on 3.5 pound boost. and goes up from there. does anyone no what it might be and if and how its fixable. also does anyne no if they are electronic or vacume gauges thanks

Edited by chirs_87
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/154814-boost-gaugue/
Share on other sites

Umm... you're definitely reading it correctly?

-7 then 0 then +7?

So a quarter way up the guage is actually vacuum between 0 and -7 mmHg.

In any case, there is a vacuum pipe running from the back of the plenum somewhere, up to the drivers side where you will find a little black box. That's the boost sensor, which then goes electronically to the guage... I thought it went to the ECU first, but someone said that this was not the case.

Edited by RANDY
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/154814-boost-gaugue/#findComment-2879464
Share on other sites

It's rated in mmHg, not bar... bear in mind =-]

So you're seeing above zero at idle? I'd probably guess it could be a sticky needle in on the dash, or something wrong with the vacuum line or sensor.

Check both under the bonnet. I've described where and what it looks like, so just check that everything looks right. If you search, you might find the voltages that the sensor puts out or something, that you could then test with a multimeter.

I guess if it's on -7 when off, and then it goes to around +3 when you start the car, it can hardly be a sticky needle. Perhaps the electrical wiring from the sensor is being grounded on the chassis somewhere causing a misreading?

Not totally sure how the pressure sensor reads and reports the pressure, but if you have a poke around i'm sure you could narrow it down.

On idle it should be a quarter from the bottom (-7)... about -3.5mmHg.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/154814-boost-gaugue/#findComment-2882333
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...