Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can any one help us? Looking to find out the below in relation to the Stagea:

1. What is the maximum vehicle towing capacity?

2. What is the maximum tow ball weight?

Very interested in considering a Stagea, how ever we have struggled to find out any information relating to their towing capacity.......

Cheers :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157769-stagea-towing-info/
Share on other sites

They don't come with tow bars, you need to get custom ones made. I guess it depends on what the tow bar engineer says.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=49484

there has been numerous threads on this already. Search is your friend.

I don't know the answer to either question.

But I do know I'm towing over 2tonne regularly (gtr and trailer) without any problems. Rear is too low but thats because I haven't put new shocks and firmer springs in yet (Sydneykid's group buy).

It does a great job

I'm towing over 2tonne regularly (gtr and trailer) without any problems.

Oooo - just hope to god you never prang it. Good luck getting an insurance company to ever pay up. How's the breakaway system set up on the trailer, just out of interest?

well...the best answer I can give to that is that the GVM on the rego papers is 1900kg. 2000kg is an estimate based on the trailer tare 500kg and gtr 1500kg :happy: It has full electric brakes but no breakaway system

Like Duncan I tow the race car with our Stagea, ours is a little lighter being an R32GTST weighing 1200 kgs with a similar 500 kg trailer with electric brakes. I also carry around 200 kgs of tools and spares. Two up, with that sort of load, the Stagea itself weighs ~2 tonnes, so towing 1,700 kgs is a breeze. Much better than the ED Foulcan waggon we used before the Stagea.

Legal....I have no idea, the numbers say that it is

I pass Police cars regularly and have never had any questions asked

Safe....as safe as any other 3.7 tonne projectile

Feels a whole lot safer than the Foulcan and the Toyota HiLux that preceeded it

Insurance.... is OK

The Stagea, the trailer and the race car are all insured through Shannons

So they know about the whole package.

:happy: cheers :kiss:

Yeh, wasn't trying to be smart (although I admit did come across that way). just that one you go over 2 tonnes, the rules change. You must have brakes on all 4 trailer wheels, and a breakaway system fitted (according to federal legislation).

Most people don't know (or care) about this (including cops) until you try to make a claim and then the insurance comapny will drop you like a hot potato.

Pretty sad really, considering many hire trailers can weigh up to 800+kg. doesn't leave much room for a car

I tow my rally car with a Forester XT (manufacturer rated at 1800kg) and it never feels happy about it. Power is not a problem - I can overtake comfortably - even uphill, just the whole combo moves the Forrie around a bit much for my liking.

As far as towing capacity goes, I'm pretty sure that the laws state that the car's towing capacity is the greater of its TARE weight, or manufacturer's official rating. In the absence of a rating (does the Stagea have one) you're limited to towing the same weight as an unladen Stagea. that may vary state to state though.

Yeh, wasn't trying to be smart (although I admit did come across that way). just that one you go over 2 tonnes, the rules change. You must have brakes on all 4 trailer wheels, and a breakaway system fitted (according to federal legislation).

Most people don't know (or care) about this (including cops) until you try to make a claim and then the insurance comapny will drop you like a hot potato.

Pretty sad really, considering many hire trailers can weigh up to 800+kg. doesn't leave much room for a car

I tow my rally car with a Forester XT (manufacturer rated at 1800kg) and it never feels happy about it. Power is not a problem - I can overtake comfortably - even uphill, just the whole combo moves the Forrie around a bit much for my liking.

As far as towing capacity goes, I'm pretty sure that the laws state that the car's towing capacity is the greater of its TARE weight, or manufacturer's official rating. In the absence of a rating (does the Stagea have one) you're limited to towing the same weight as an unladen Stagea. that may vary state to state though.

A Forrester GT weighs about 200 kgs less than a Stagea. Plus it is a front wheel drive waggon that drives a little bit at the rear, ocassionally. The Stagea is a rear wheel drive waggon that drives occasionally at the front. Big difference, that's why we get almost no "pushing" from the trailer.

I have no concerns with insurance, Shannons know the weights of all three (Stagea, R32GTST and trailer).

The NSW regulations are;

1. All trailers with a Gross Trailer Mass (GTM) exceeding 750kg and first registered after 30 June 1990

are required to be fitted with an efficient braking system. For trailers with a GTM of up to 2 tonnes,

this braking system can be either an overrun system or one that is operated from the driver's seat.

2. For trailers with a GTM exceeding 2 tonnes, the braking system must be capable of being applied from

the driver’s seat - overrun brakes are not acceptable. In addition, the braking system must be such

that if the trailer accidentally breaks away (from the towing vehicle), the trailer brakes will apply

automatically and remain applied for at least 15 minutes.

3. It should be noted that the brakes must operate on ALL WHEELS (exceptions are trailers not over 2

tonnes Aggregate Trailer Mass (ATM) and trailers manufactured prior to ADR 38/--. Their service

brakes must operate on all wheels on at least one axle).

(ATM = the weight of the trailer, its load and the draw bar load)

(GTM = the weight of the trailer and its load)

ie; the only difference is GTM doesn't include the draw bar weight.

Since my ATM is not over 2 tonnes, rule #2 does not apply to me.

This is an Australian Design Rule (ADR #38) so it SHOULD apply everywhere in Australia. But some states are notorious for ignoring ADR's, so best to check with your local Authority.

:wave: cheers :)

A Forrester GT weighs about 200 kgs less than a Stagea. Plus it is a front wheel drive waggon that drives a little bit at the rear, ocassionally. The Stagea is a rear wheel drive waggon that drives occasionally at the front. Big difference, that's why we get almost no "pushing" from the trailer.

Well, firstly, the XT is full time AWD, not a Front driver driving the rear wheels on occasion. Far better for towing than any other setup - even the Nissan ATESSA system. Secondly, nothing wrong with front drive vehicles for towing (WRT stability). Some traction problems and long term structural integrity issues can be a concern, but one of the best tow vehicles I've used was a TH Magna. i wouldn't believe it either if I hadn't experienced it myself.

my criticism of the Forester is as much the blame of the trailer (very short drawbar, and some gemetry issues in the axle design) as the Forester itself. I've never towed another heavy trailer with the Forry, nor have I towed the car trailer behind another vehicle, so can't comment for sure. The self levelling rear suspension also makes it hard to gauge the weight on the towball, which as you'd know has a huge effect on the towing stability. I'm still fine tuning that aspect of it.

Looking again at the ADR's, my interpretation is that the ATM is the total mass of the trailer, ie unhitch it on a weighbridge and it's the total weight of the combo. The GTM is the load that the trailer exerts on the ground, ie the total mass less the towball vertical load (often about 100-200kg). In that case, a 600kg trailer with a 1500kg car on it still qualifies as GTM under 2 tonnes, if the drawbar load is 150kg (about what it should be)

Anyone comment on this?

Well, firstly, the XT is full time AWD, not a Front driver driving the rear wheels on occasion. Far better for towing than any other setup - even the Nissan ATESSA system. Secondly, nothing wrong with front drive vehicles for towing (WRT stability). Some traction problems and long term structural integrity issues can be a concern, but one of the best tow vehicles I've used was a TH Magna. i wouldn't believe it either if I hadn't experienced it myself.

my criticism of the Forester is as much the blame of the trailer (very short drawbar, and some gemetry issues in the axle design) as the Forester itself. I've never towed another heavy trailer with the Forry, nor have I towed the car trailer behind another vehicle, so can't comment for sure. The self levelling rear suspension also makes it hard to gauge the weight on the towball, which as you'd know has a huge effect on the towing stability. I'm still fine tuning that aspect of it.

Looking again at the ADR's, my interpretation is that the ATM is the total mass of the trailer, ie unhitch it on a weighbridge and it's the total weight of the combo. The GTM is the load that the trailer exerts on the ground, ie the total mass less the towball vertical load (often about 100-200kg). In that case, a 600kg trailer with a 1500kg car on it still qualifies as GTM under 2 tonnes, if the drawbar load is 150kg (about what it should be)

Anyone comment on this?

The Forrester has a centre differential, the engine drives the front wheels ALL THE TIME, hence the rear wheels can NEVER have more than 50% of the drive. The Stagea has no centre differential, the engine drives the rear wheels ALL THE TIME. They can (and do) receive more than 50% of the drive, MOST of the time. Hence, BIG difference.

I have also towed a race car with a Magna, albeit under 1500 kgs all up, and it was fine. Except taking off from a standstill in the rain, that was tricky. Plus I got it bogged in the pits more than once when it thunder stormed late in the day. Did the same with the Foulcan, so that's not too much of black mark.

For determining draw bar weight, try a set of scales under the jocky wheel set at the towing height, it gives a pretty good indication.

You got it, with ATM versus GTM, the draw bar weight is the difference. If it has a GTM under 2 tonnes then you don't need break away brakes. But if the ATM is over 2 tonnes, then the brakes have to work on all wheels.

So in your example (ATM 2100 kgs, GTM 1950 KGS) the way I read it, the trailer would need brakes on all wheels, but no break away braking system. And those brakes would not need to "be capable of being applied from the driver’s seat". eg; 4 wheel overrun brakes would be OK.

:rofl: cheers :)

Yet when the going gets slippery, the Subaru system is far better than the Nissan system because it delivers torque to the wheel as soon as any slip ocurs, not when the compueter decides that a predetermined set of parameters has been met. I've personally experienced this on track days where the GTR's kept falling off the track backwards (along with every other 2WD car out there) and the Subys just kept going round and round.

If there's no slip, then it doesn't matter a toss what wheels are driving. I'm just saying that the Subaru system copes with loss of traction better than the artificial environment created by the Nissan system

I know we can argue the merits of each all day, and I gather we'll never agree on the matter, so I'm more than happy to agree to disagree. Besides, in this case the biggest factor affecting stability for towing is the weight of the towing vehicle, which is where the Stag has a 150-ish kg advantage.

I'm hopefully picking up a new tdi pathfinder very soon, so the Forry will become the family taxi and the Pathfinder will be my toy.

Interesting about your comments on the Falcon tow car. I had an XG (EL) XR6 ute before the Magna, which I thought was OK until I tried the Magna. The Ute used to get bogged in the grass behind my house as well. I think only a 4Wd would have gotten me out of that one though.

Probably not for usage on a race track or normal driving situations at all, the Stagea has a little button on the dash that can be pressed to give 50/50 split front/rear, driving away on wet slippery grass with no fuss at all.

Yet when the going gets slippery, the Subaru system is far better than the Nissan system because it delivers torque to the wheel as soon as any slip ocurs, not when the compueter decides that a predetermined set of parameters has been met. I've personally experienced this on track days where the GTR's kept falling off the track backwards (along with every other 2WD car out there) and the Subys just kept going round and round.

If there's no slip, then it doesn't matter a toss what wheels are driving. I'm just saying that the Subaru system copes with loss of traction better than the artificial environment created by the Nissan system

I know we can argue the merits of each all day, and I gather we'll never agree on the matter, so I'm more than happy to agree to disagree. Besides, in this case the biggest factor affecting stability for towing is the weight of the towing vehicle, which is where the Stag has a 150-ish kg advantage.

I'm hopefully picking up a new tdi pathfinder very soon, so the Forry will become the family taxi and the Pathfinder will be my toy.

Interesting about your comments on the Falcon tow car. I had an XG (EL) XR6 ute before the Magna, which I thought was OK until I tried the Magna. The Ute used to get bogged in the grass behind my house as well. I think only a 4Wd would have gotten me out of that one though.

The non spinning in the wet is not due to the 4wd system, it is due to front wheel drive first bias :rofl:

The worst tow car I ever had was an SS manual ute, 1st was too high and the lack of weight over the rear wheels was a dissaster, then I was always worried about stuff being stolen out of the back. I moved it on very quickly.

:) cheers :sick:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...