Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys i have a s2 r33 gtst and i amwondering wat to do next.

ok so far i have standard turbo still. i have a hks airpod, bov. boost controller running 12 psi,

full cat back exhaust and i am putting on a dump pipe and front mount intercooler next week.

at the moment i am just keeping the standard turbo. is there aything else i need to do with these sorts of mods?? eg, fuel cut defender? upgrade fuel pummp?

whats next?? please help?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159051-r33-gtst-wat-next/
Share on other sites

how much power you chasing id go for the smarts things liek a power fc plug in n play easy also a walbro fuel pump and maybe some injectors and if you wanna do a turbo as i think you do try one of these

KKR430

http://www.otomoto.com.au/kkrturbo.htm

all pretty resiable priced wont cost you a arm and a leg but still get awsome results

it depends on wat your chaing big power or nice n reliable all round 240rwkw

how much power you chasing id go for the smarts things liek a power fc plug in n play easy also a walbro fuel pump and maybe some injectors and if you wanna do a turbo as i think you do try one of these

KKR430

http://www.otomoto.com.au/kkrturbo.htm

all pretty resiable priced wont cost you a arm and a leg but still get awsome results

it depends on wat your chaing big power or nice n reliable all round 240rwkw

if i add the kkr do i need to replace the manifold or will the standard be rite?? and do i need a external wastegate? or would an easier choice be to high flow the turbo

direct replacement nothing required

yeh so it is a direct replacement hey. sounds good hey. not to expensive either. pretty cheap/

are they of good quality. tough??

so no external wastegate needed ??

wat else would i need to do? if i got the kkr i would need upgrade fuel pump, ecu? and injctors.

is that all>?>

yeh so it is a direct replacement hey. sounds good hey. not to expensive either. pretty cheap/

are they of good quality. tough??

so no external wastegate needed ??

wat else would i need to do? if i got the kkr i would need upgrade fuel pump, ecu? and injctors.

is that all>?>

these turbos are on the ls1 tt kits have a look on the bottom of that page good quality turobs no waste gate needed internal gated

KKR turbos are not direct replacement.

If your not looking for huge power get one of the slide highflows, not much better "bang for your buck". (Search for slide) And alot more stealth, which is always important in good old victoria.

But like Paul said before you do anything get fuel pump and tune.

KKR380

The ultimate turbo for SR20 or large twin-turbo applications

Water-cooled, 0.86 turbine housing, suits T25 size flange

Internal wastegate with 8psi actuator

Suitable for single-turbo applications on 2.0-2.5 litre engines, or in

twin turbo kits on 4.0 to 6.0 litre engines

Comes with exhaust flange featuring 3-bolt outlet, T25 exhaust gasket,

oil inlet banjo bolt and oil return gasket.

thats the one id go for with a power fc n pump since you have the rest

these turbos are on the ls1 tt kits have a look on the bottom of that page good quality turobs no waste gate needed internal gated

yeh had a look. yeh so 840 bucks later and this could be on my skyline hey. good power output from it i am guessing. i was chasing around the 230 mark.

i am happy with this turbo. it sounds the way to go. wont need to change dump pipe will i??

id be guessing so ring him ask him he is pretty good to talk to but like i said dont go getting a turbo n say yer awsome invest in a ecu power fc is the best option with a fuel pump you looking at aorund 1200 for both even cheaper if you look around then get the turbo

id be guessing so ring him ask him he is pretty good to talk to but like i said dont go getting a turbo n say yer awsome invest in a ecu power fc is the best option with a fuel pump you looking at aorund 1200 for both even cheaper if you look around then get the turbo

yeh my pipe and intercooler are on this week and then i will be saving my pennys and looking to get my hands on a new fuel pump and ecu. and yeh either this option or high flowed option sounds good

Also if you dont have one yet get an upgraded clutch and flywheel combo, also some good brake pads and fluid. All the power in the world is useless if you cant slow it down.

yeh i gathered about the clutch giving way.

thanks for your help guys. will be looking forward to getting it done down the track. would be interested to see how much power i have now at the wheels

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...