Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some of you might remember this car from ZOOMs Project 11s series of stories. Since our track shut in SA (AIR) we cant really complete the story, but here it is, in full 11 second capable trim, department of road transport approved and registered with an RB26DETT for $15,000 ono. Heres the specs -

1992 R33 GTS 4 door

Engine -

RB26DETT R32 GTR engine, rebuilt by Willall Racing to factory specifications (5500km since rebuild)

R33 GTR cranshaft and oil pump used during rebuild for reliability

R33 GTR Intercooler

Stock turbochargers

Power - 244rwkw @ 1.0 bar boost pressure

Performance: 12.56 @ 115mph (AIR 4,6 and Rotor nats)

Transmission

Nissan RE50A 5 speed electronic automatic transmission

Fully built by MV Automatics with extra clutch packs, modified valve body

2800rpm stall converter

Electrics -

Apex Power FC engine management system

R33 GTR fuel pump

Chassis/Brakes

HSD Coil Over adjustable suspension

R32 GTR Braking System

R33 GTS-t 4.11 ratio LSD

Body

R33 GTR Front bar (genuine)

R34 GTT rims with good condition Wahnlis on board :)

This is an extremely quick and bulletproof reliable car that will run proven 12 second passes on street tyres at the drop of a hat, get 10l/100km fuel economy around town, and is legally registerable and insurable in any state of Australia, so no reason to be scared of a defect. This car really is the ultimate sleeper!

Any interested parties enquire by PM....and the car is available for viewing in SA :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159730-sold/
Share on other sites

Heres the engine on the stand after it was freshly built ;)

gtrengine1.jpg

Then after Willall Racing installed it back in the car with the factory airbox and all of the correct GTR parts including an R33 strut brace. This car is the real deal, and ran its 12.5 second pass through both the stock air filter and exhaust. Its a brilliant package :D

gtrengine2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159730-sold/#findComment-2969346
Share on other sites

mate if i can sell the 180 (or you want a trade even with a bit of cash ur way) consider this sold ;). Im inadelaide too

We are selling the car because we are moving on to other projects. We also dont need to try and make a profit. This is realistic price for a properly thought out and modified car :D

If anyone here knows Willall Racing they will know that their 8 second GTRs are perfectly presented and well engineered, this car is no different. Thats why I had it built by the best :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159730-sold/#findComment-2969405
Share on other sites

sorry, i know its off topic, but are you allowed to give out any clues as to where your going next in terms of project cars? im a loyal fan of both zoom and HPI, so gimme the scoop ;)

Edited by VB-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159730-sold/#findComment-2969466
Share on other sites

sorry, i know its off topic, but are you allowed to give out any clues as to where your going next in terms of project cars? im a loyal fan of both zoom and HPI, so gimme the scoop :D

Nice one....the project cars are secret at this stage :worship:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159730-sold/#findComment-2971567
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...