Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've noticed there is a fair bit of engine management threads and discussions going on.

Just thought it might be an idea to start its own sub section to put all the engine management and tuning threads into it.

The forced induction section is currently being used quite a bit for this. But lets face it, engine management is a big enough topic on its own to have it's own section.

I feel the forced induction section is kind of getting overrun with engine management questions/topics, but that's just me.

Its just an idea I'm putting forward to you to improve the ease browsing the site. If it's not convenient or not really applicable at this time than I understand.

Thanks,

KeyMakeR33

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164917-new-section-idea/
Share on other sites

As the mod for the area, i dont feel thats the case personally. I would like to see it all stay as is.

I think its a good idea to keep it all under the relevant area. Like Turbo tuning info stays in FI, NA tuning in NA.

It would induce more confusion i feel if they were intermixed.

When you look at all the Mod/Main sectional areas, they are split into General areas, rather than specific.

Just my take on it being in there daily

Thats fair enough then. I respect your feelings on it. At the end of the day, it's not me that makes the decision, but rather it's for yourself and the administrators to discuss and make the decision.

It wouldn't really phase me if it happens or not.

Maybe we need more feedback on the matter. What does everyone else think of the idea?

i agree that there needs to be a section for things that cover more than one of the current ones. engine management, diagnostics, consult, engine sensors, piggybacks, and so on - no topic in any of these areas belongs in any specific forum, but most often they are created in the forced induction simply because its more popular, not because its the most appropriate place to create the thread.

the mechanical sides of things are covered well, and the na/turbo split works fine there, but not for the non-mechanical side of things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you tried another indicator stalk? Sometimes these go bad and cause issues.
    • They're so beautiful 😍
    • Early last week, I became concerned that the car was feeling....slow. Most of my driving is commuting to/from work and there are few opportunities to get up it and convincingly make boost/power. It drives in vacuum almost all the time. But when you do occasionally get an opportunity, and.... it takes a little longer to start making power, and then there's not as much as you'd expect, and then you run out of road anyway and have to bottle out - it can be hard to be convinced that there's something wrong. But by the end of the week I was pretty convinced. Made an effort to get a decent test run. Took bloody forever to come up on boost and when it did it would only make about 50 kPa of pressure. There was no black smoke, no noise of a boost or exhaust leak, no evidence anywhere of an intercooler hose clamp being sloppy enough to let air escape. So.... not that sort of problem. Brainstorming led to thinking that the boost controller's solenoid might have failed in some way. No active boost control would just give wastegate pressure, which I was more or less getting, and the laggy behaviour could just be "normal" shitty boost response from an uncontrolled highflow. But a little extra 3rd party brainstorming led to the thought that the actuator circlip might have jumped off leaving me with a bluetooth wastegate. So, on Friday, off comes the stock heatshield (which is an annoying enough job on its own) to reveal - yup. WG is wide open. And.... it won't come back. It is jammed in the dump. Put the rod back on with a new circlip and tried driving it to get it hot in the hope that the capture was from thermal effects having been blown into the dump when hot and since cooled. Nope. Won't move, even with screwdriver mediated force when hot. Ran out of time to play. Came back to it yesterday. Unbolted the dump. Was lying under it with the dump jammed up against my guts undoing the bottom 2 bolts. Got them most of the way out and gave the dump a serious heave. It didn't noticeably move, but there was a satisfying "plink" noise from up to. Shuffle out and sure enough, gate is now closed. Nevermind that there was still the better part of an hour after that required to put it all back together. f**ken cars.
    • For your application, where you'll be at that 1/2" size or perhaps larger, yeah, excellent. Although not if you need a tight bending radius anywhere, because the corrugated stuff is not anywhere near as flexible as rubber/teflon cored stuff. But for turbo oil lines? No. Too big. They just don't do the corro stuff down at the ~1/4" ID size that you'd want, and if they did the OD of it would probably be a bit too fat for fitting it into the tight spaces available. I use hoses like that all the time for fuel gases (LPG, NG) and liquid fuels (HFO, diesels, waste oils). When we did the London Olympic cauldron, with the 204 individual burners on it, we had miles of the stuff (although a lot of that was teflon core). A bunch of that crap is still cluttering up the workshop, more than 12 years later!
    • Would something like this be an option  https://processhose.com/products/configurable-metal-hoses/1-2-in-t316-stainless-steel-annular-corrugated-configurable-flexible-metal-hose-assembly-with-ends-t304-single-braid-masterflex-af5550.html I'm looking at this for replacing the OEM EGR when installing a aftermarket intake plenum 
×
×
  • Create New...