Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

PCV is there to stop blow by pressurising the crank case. the reason I believe it would be better to put it through a filter first is that the contaminants in the crank case fumes can be somewhat removed by the process of filtration - so a catch can would be better than just plumbing those gases straight into the plenum. Any contaminents in the gases would effect the combustion process and therefore reduce power and economy - very slightly though, but none the less, would be detrimental. Unfortunatley it is not legal to vent these gasses to atmoshpere, so you would have to plumb them back somewhere.

I do know what you mean about coolers getting coated. I noticed on mine when I fitted a front mount that the intake side was black from oil and contamination - hardly helpful to the cooling process.

All of this would be from when driving on boost, as when not on boost the gases plumb directly into the plenum. The problem is the oil/contaminates that gets suspended in the gas from the crankcase, coat the cooler. Thus the creation of the catch can, or breather if you want to vent to atmo.

A good catch can will remove this contamination, therefore making the only downside to recirculating burnt gasses that there is no oxygen, but at least all the nasty rubbish isnt going directly into the plenum, so combustion would be effected to a lesser extent than if the gasses were plumbed directly into the plenum.

So, in summary, the amount of oil and contamination should be well within the capability of any decent catch can, as it is moving at low velocity, and isnt of a sufficient quantity to have a negative effect on the cooler - this only may happen if the catch can isnt particularly well designed, and when on boost, not when at idle/cruise conditions.

Basically, everything to gain and nothing to loose.

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

By the sounds of it you basically agree with me then (?) You no longer think its a good idea to get rid of the line to the plenum?

Just a few things though.

"PCV is there to stop blow by pressurising the crank case."

The two rocker cover outlets alone would stop this as any pressure could easily escape through them.

"All of this (crap inside the cooler) would be from when driving on boost, as when not on boost the gases plumb directly into the plenum."

True, but only when you leave the PCV system intact like how I discribe, otherwise the crap will go through the cooler at all times (albeit filtered with a catch can)

Look at brownies last drwing or my drawings, the PCV system is still there AND it still filters the gasses that go into the plenum! (the only differance between mine and his, is that mine uses active crankcase scavenging)

In either of our systems you get the benefits of filtering the gasses at ALL times AND you have the benefit of the gasses only going through the cooler sometimes.

Surely thats a good thing, right? I mean, why not do it that way if you can? Thats my gripe.

"Basically, everything to gain and nothing to loose."

Heres a dodgy scenario with figures plucked directy from my arse. I will choose figures that make it easier to understand and might not necissarily be what would happen but the will do to show the point.

(A) Blocked PCV with catch can fitted. Catch can filters 90% of the oil out. But the gasses go through the cooler 100% of the time.

(B) Dead standard system with no mods at all. It leaves 100% of the oil vapour in the gas. But 90% of the time the gasses go straight into the plenum and NOT through the cooler.

In that scenario the potential for clogging the cooler is the SAME for the catchcan system with blocked PCV line, and the standard system. The contaminents in the vapor are much less with the catch can system, but they flow through the cooler much more often. The benefits tend to cancel eachother out somwhat no matter what figures you use.

The catch can system is still better than stock because, the OVERALL amount of contaminents that reaches the ENGINE will still be 90% less than stock. But the amount of contaminents that will reach the COOLER will be similar.

© Catch can fitted with PCV intact, see brownies last pic or my pics. You still get ALL the benefits of (A), and you get ALL the benefits of (B). Would you agree that in that case there realy is everything to gain and nothing to loose?

Agreed filtering all the gasses would be ideal, (well nearly, venting them to atmo would be ideal, but illegal) and have them go through the plenum when not boosting, instead of the cooler, is better than having all the gasses go through the cooler all the time.

Just think that for the work involved, as the amount of contamination of the cooler from cruise idle blow by would be miniscule, versus blocking the line from the rocker cover to the plenum - just not too sure it would be worth the extra buggerising around and the extra hoses 'untidying':) the engine bay. For me anyways. I like to keep things neat.

Wouldnt it be easier to have two catch cans, one before the air intake, one between the rocker cover and plenum? - would be alot neater ;)

  • 1 month later...

Thanks guys...

Paul,

The catch can you are talking about. Is it one line in, and one line out (back to intake) and this line carrys just air not vapour. Correct?

The can i showed in my beautiful diagram was two lines in...and then just a breather at the top. But yeah like Steve said only one line really needed.

Dennis,

it only looks like i'm banned. :)

Thanks again,

Scott

  • 1 month later...
Guest MrEscortCosworth

oil/air seperater are legal if they do recirculate, and not vent to the air.

if your a smartassss to the cops they will pick on you and most of us dont know the law that well so they get away with a bit. i was under the impression that they are not allowed to look under the bonnet but hey, whats gonna be illegal, just make sure it all looks good and recirculate your bov, cos thats the main thing...

regards Anthony

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...