Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have been offerd 82mm Custom CP pistons and cometic head gasket. Anyone ho has experience on boreing the cylinder from stock 78-82mm? Are the walls thick enough or DOES the kit require cylinder sleeves. Nobody has ever answered this question, and I am a little sceptic to bore 4mm over. Afraid the walls will be to thin to handle any boost.

This seller tells me its safe and no prob. to have 82m pistons fitted.

And are there any diffrence on the cylinder walls on the early and late RB20DET engines?

Thanks for any replys,

Thomas.H

www.edgeperformance.no

Edited by impultion
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169846-rb22det-safe-to-bore-4mm/
Share on other sites

Thanks, Hi went with 83mm pistons. 5mm over. I will hear with him wht hi has done with the block.

check the rb24 thread think the guy already has pics of his bored out not sure how big he went though

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...20&start=20

Hi, are you sure?

This guy bored 5mm over. 83mm on his RB20 block

Murravis:

Hi Mate,

The block i have used is from a 93 r32 gts-t

The walls are still pretty thick, i got them checked when they did it and they said there fine, There is no need to sleeve the block, i was going too but the machine shop said there is no need too.

We took mine out 5mm and there fine, if tomie has made pistons to do the rb22 or rb24 conversion at a bore of 83mm they must be fine.

on another note is that your engine bay below?

Cheers

Cameron

boring out an engine and then not inserting sleeves = engine rebuild in the near future.

Well a guy i work with is an engine reconditioner by trade and he's done allot of boring in his life. He told me RB blocks are bullet proof when untouched, never seem to wear much at all (especially RB30 blocks). But once they are boared it's a very different story, much faster wear etc. using inserts will prevent this happening.

As most people will know Cast iron only has a hard outer skin (add to this nissan uses gas nitriding to harden the surface further) and the inside is very very soft. Generally the skin only has about <2mm of 'hard' surface. If you want to take of 5mm from the diamater that's a 2.5mm deep bore which is most likely the castings skin gone or very thin at best. Hence the reason people use inserts because they provide the skin again.

Machine shops will gladly do the work i'm sure but don't expect your block to last as long. personally id go for inserts especially on a bore that big.

PS: Incase i confised anyone. it's not the strength of the wall's that i'm talking about it's the hardness which will casue premature wearing of the block. You don't want that!

Edited by deant1

Hi,

Thanks for that information. Do you know of anyone ho has forged pistons and rods to the RB20DET in stock?

Thomas

Well a guy i work with is an engine reconditioner by trade and he's done allot of boring in his life. He told me RB blocks are bullet proof when untouched, never seem to wear much at all (especially RB30 blocks). But once they are boared it's a very different story, much faster wear etc. using inserts will prevent this happening.

As most people will know Cast iron only has a hard outer skin (add to this nissan uses gas nitriding to harden the surface further) and the inside is very very soft. Generally the skin only has about <2mm of 'hard' surface. If you want to take of 5mm from the diamater that's a 2.5mm deep bore which is most likely the castings skin gone or very thin at best. Hence the reason people use inserts because they provide the skin again.

Machine shops will gladly do the work i'm sure but don't expect your block to last as long. personally id go for inserts especially on a bore that big.

PS: Incase i confised anyone. it's not the strength of the wall's that i'm talking about it's the hardness which will casue premature wearing of the block. You don't want that!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...