Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I need help to find out the right turbo for my GTR R33 with

HKS 264 cam

Ported head

Metal Head Gaskets ( 2 mm )

Arias piston

H Beam connecting rods

Nismo bearing connecting rod

Tomei bearing main

1000cc injectors

2 X walbro fuel pump

HKS 4'' intercooler

OS clutch (triple plate)

Infinity throttle body

Oversize oil pan

HKS Circle Earth System

Greddy oil cooler

Greddy oil pump

Greddy intake

Greddy radiator

Geddy Valve springs

Greddy fuel delivery

ECU Microtech

Microtech X6 Ignition

I'm going to use it few hours on the weekend and I'm looking for the best turbo from 0 to 200 KM with correct A/R and trim

I'm not going to spend that much for it, maybe something like 2000 AUD max so I think I will go for none ball bearing

I was looking for Garrett GT4202 with small A/R (custom) but I think it's till big for my engine ! and PTE turbos

OR what do you think the best turbo 1/4

I will be happy to read your opinions about the right turbo and my R33

Regards

RB26

Edited by RB26 lover

Well +700hp... and only going to 200km/h. Bit of a catch 22 :cool:

I could think of turbos 700hp (or less) that would perform pretty well. Especially pitted against a lag beast GT42, which for a stock capacity RB26, is far too large and would make the car slower to 200km/h. 300km/h might be different, but debated on a motor that will struggle to spin the turbo.

IMO, your better off with a better suited GT35 & 350-370rwkw. That will fling you to 200km/h faster than something overtly large

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
×
×
  • Create New...