Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was at autobarn today and i dont know if this guy was spinning crap to me but he told me that

the only different and the rb25de and rb25det is nothing since that didnt want to waiste money on changing internals he said the only thing i need to change on my rb25de engine is the decompression plate and the head gasket and then i can add a turbo and get an ecu and get it tuned? is he correct or is he spinning shit to try and look good?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/174021-na-engine-same-internals/
Share on other sites

yes its true just high comp and no piston squirters is the only difference

I know of one 33 NA 25 make 265rwkw on 12psi wt hks 2535

without a different h/g

so depending on your needs your current motor may be fine

Edited by 1400r
yes its true just high comp and no piston squirters is the only difference

I know of one 33 NA 25 make 265rwkw on 12psi wt hks 2535

without a different h/g

so depending on your needs your current motor may be fine

what do u mean are u saying i can gain decent kw gain from other addons and just keep it a n/a engine?

i wouldnt mind leaving it n/a if i had some decent power

yeh no

turboing your current motor may be fine for your power goals

i have a turbo and everything i need right now except for the ecu and the decompression stuff.

can u name everything i would need to change it over internal wise... is it just called a decompression kit ?

and i have a turbo that runs 15psi on the lowest setting.

im pretty sure this is what its called. it has a nissan rb25 turbo front housing with a garret gt30 front comp wheel with a ar63 or 62 rear housing.. my mate had it on his drift car he said its a 500hp turbo does that sound correct?

hello could anyone here please tell me what it is i need as i heard i only need this decompression plate?

would it be better with a better head gasket aswell?

and could u please give me the name of what plate/hg i would need or even a site for it would be better

and whats the piston squirters 1400r was talking about

Edited by Spartann

just go a larger head gasket

to obtain atleast the same comp ratio as a factory turbo motor or less

and get that turbo running less boost 12 psi is probably max you would want to run

ps theres a NA section on here somewhere with a how to turbo your na 33 would be worth reading that thread

as it would have all your answers

here it is

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=69998

Edited by 1400r
just go a larger head gasket

to obtain atleast the same comp ratio as a factory turbo motor or less

and get that turbo running less boost 12 psi is probably max you would want to run

ps theres a NA section on here somewhere with a how to turbo your na 33 would be worth reading that thread

as it would have all your answers

here it is

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=69998

hi i read the turbo on n/a post but they didnt talk about having the same internals.

they said just leave the compression ratio which i dont want to do. if i just change the head gasket would the engine be able to withstand 15psi? or would i need to upgrade to forged pistons?

hi i read the turbo on n/a post but they didnt talk about having the same internals.

they said just leave the compression ratio which i dont want to do. if i just change the head gasket would the engine be able to withstand 15psi? or would i need to upgrade to forged pistons?

the std internals will cope with 15psi.... depends on your tuner as to how long it will last.

  • 2 weeks later...

mine was orginally a na but I converted to turbo just changed the motor apparently alot is different cams, pistons most of which are made for forced induction which are also stronger also your gunna need a different fuel pump if ya gunna b running high boost, the na gearbox wont handle the torque neither the brakes which are alot smaller if you intent to stop and the diff is made for top end the turbo model is for better acceleration you's may think i dont know but ive been there!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...