Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

"THEORY OF MAGNETIC POWER

POWER NEO uses a strong magnetic field from the neodymum magnets to re-arrange the gasoline molecules to be in a more structured which provides a more complete combustion. This improves the combustion efficiency, and in turn reduces the amount of unburnt gasoline and corbon monoxide in the hydrocarbon infested exhaust gas. Carbon monoxide is the main component in exhaust gas pollution. POWER NEO is able to contribute to the global warming reduction which is the biggest environmental problem today.

...

With POWER NEO, the driver will see a dramatic improvement in torque at low RPM levels. This improved torque is a result of a more explosive combustion due to a more complete fuel burn (as close as 100%). Power is improved through out the RPM range without pressing the accelerator too much. This will also improve mileage as a result of lesser fuel consumption."

http://shorterlink.com/?LJ0R0S

I had something similar in my previous car, called a Triple Charger. I was under the impression that it helped with my exhaust emissions after testing it a few months after installing but now I'm starting to think it was the better grade of oil I swapped to at the same time. It was also meant to improve power and economy.

I put it on my Skyline a couple of months ago and monitored the economy. About the only difference I noticed was that it was now harder to start, because it was mounted vertically and the fuel would drain back down the line. The fuel pump has a preset timer on it to fill the fuel filter and prime the injectors when you switch the ignition on, but with this extra reservoir installed it obviously hadn't primed the injectors yet and thus more cranking was needed.

It was hard to say if my fuel economy improved or not, because I installed it around the same time I did some mods to my car. But a couple of weeks ago I got sick of the hard starting and so took it off without doing any other mods. Voila, my fuel economy went from about 14.5L/100km to 13.8L/100km.

So I would say it and all things like it are a crock of shit :)

"Then there was the item that by late 1986 was creating considerable conflict between GM-H and the HDT, namely the 'energy polariser'.

... The HDT press release described the 'polariser' briefly as "a new development, which improves overall vehicle efficiency, ride comfort and stability." Among the claims made by Peter Brock for his invention were that it enabled a car tuned for super petrol to run ULP with no ill effects whatsoever. Such a claim is in defiance of all normal logic, but Brock insisted on the truth of it. He admitted that this was "way out thinking" but it was clear that his faith was beyond question or challenge. On the other hand, GM-H dismissed it in these terms; "as far as the energy polariser is concerned GM-H can see no technical merit in it and cannot endorse its use". Peter Brock's clash with GM-H peaked in February '87, with the announcement that the long-standing relationship with HDT and GM-H was over. "

And then from www.skeptics.com.au

"In 1982, Australian Skeptics instituted an award to be presented annually at the National Convention to individuals or organisations who made the most outrageous claim of a paranormal or pseudoscientific nature in the preceding year. ...

The next award went to an Australian sporting icon. In 1986, Peter Brock, Australia's premier touring car driver, became involved in promoting an "energy polariser" which, he alleged, when attached to the firewall of a car, improved its performance in all fields. The device was not connected to any of the vehicle systems and supposedly worked by application of mysterious "energies unknown to science". Along with motoring journals, the Skeptics conducted an investigation of the device and found that there was no basis to the claims made. The fallout from this affair saw Brock severing his relationship with General Motors, his long time sponsors and with a number of his colleagues. The publicity associated with the case saw the device withdrawn from sale."

It sounds like the fuel didn't even run through this device at all.

The polariser sat on the Commodore's dash/firewall on the inside! It wasn't a fuel catalyser at all, it was meant to affect the whole car via some mysterious energies. It was also meant to improve handling and braking.

What I want a lot more than the polariser are the drugs that Brockie was on when he thought the polariser actually did something :)

I do work with chemistry every day at uni. I dont see how you can "align" fuel molecules. Fuel is a bunch of saturated and unsaturated hyrdocarbons. They are not polar whatsoever. So to to align them using some magnet is just a joke. Try sellin this to any seasoned chemist... However the other ones that release stuff into the fuel like Tin may do somethin, but aligning fuel molecules.. haha.. I should keep quiet now :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • haha this shit box doesn't drink coolant, for now       Let me guess, they make heaps of power, use the car for straight line driving and don't care about noise
    • They’re so great that I know of someone pulling one out to go back to a sequential 
    • Hello everyone. I've recently started the research into R34 GTR front bits and running into eye watering prices. On the plus site it looks like some places make 'replacement' fender liners for these cars. At eye-watering-but-less than stock prices. I also noticed there's plenty of diffuser options available too. What I would like to know is if my following assumptions are correct. 1) The OEM guard liners are actually only 'half' the liner. They go together with the OEM brake vents which are a separate item which looks to be quite a large 'panel' that is part of the liner. The GTR bumper has bolt holes along the front. I assume the ones in the vent correspond to the ones the OEM liner does not have (circled?)   2) The V-Spec front diffuser supplants the brake ducts in the above item. I am assuming these still work with the guard liners as there's no alternate part that I'm aware of. I don't see how they go together, so I'm making the assumption that they have to, somehow. I know the center splash guard is different on the V-Spec (and is the price of the damn diffuser alone). How does the liner interact with this? 3) There's alternate front diffusers that do away with it all. Annoyingly, a lot of the clones and CF different ones... have no brake ducts on them. I like the idea of them though. My brakes get hot on the track. These alternate diffusers are a lot cheaper than plastic splash guards. I'm assuming you don't have to/aren't supposed to remove guard liners to run a diffuser. I suspect that quite a few people actually do not run the guard liner because with a front undertray you're getting a lot of 'splash' guarding anyway, and most people remove liners given they're probably running a pretty aggressive setup with a diffuser at the front. It would also be nice to know if anyone has ever run the 'reproduction' guard liners and know whether the fitment is OEM quality or "OEM Quality". Example: https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/356254671561 https://carbonetics.net/products/nissan-skyline-r34-gtr-plastic-front-wheel-arch-set Is this knowledge still around?
    • Really, effort is pretty low. You hand fistfuls of cash over to someone else and pick it up when done...   And at least this shitbox isn't drinking coolant right?  
    • And most chargers that most DIY people own would put bugger all power back into the battery between cylinders. I've always done it with jumper packs/second battery connected. And that's on any car.   Because race car, and wanting the lightness.  At least in an R33, putting a bigger battery in can at least help shift the weight balance backwards  
×
×
  • Create New...