Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Tried a search and all i can come up with is the sizes that people fit...

I have an R34 GTT.

I know they come with 17x7.5

What is the PCD on this model?

And what offset are the stock wheels and what can i fit up to?

I might get some deep dish if i can (not going to fit spacers...and do not want to make the rims stick out)

And also, what is the point in having wider rims at the back?

Just better grip?

Thx in advance~

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/174937-what-offset-and-size-can-i-fit/
Share on other sites

Tried a search and all i can come up with is the sizes that people fit...

I have an R34 GTT.

I know they come with 17x7.5

What is the PCD on this model?

And what offset are the stock wheels and what can i fit up to?

I might get some deep dish if i can (not going to fit spacers...and do not want to make the rims stick out)

And also, what is the point in having wider rims at the back?

Just better grip?

Thx in advance~

I hope this helps?

PCD: 5 x 114.3

Standard R34 GT-T: offset +35 Size:17 x 7.5

IMO I have seen lots of 34's usually running the following:

Front: 17 x 8 +30 - +36 will sit just inside the guards nicely

Rear: 17 x 9 +32 - +38 will also fill the guards nicely

And the same can be repeated in 18's aswell without any problem :thumbsup:

As far as if staggering wheel size providing more grip, for the most part it will have to do with the choice of tyre you use..

Phill

18x8.5 front 18x9.5 rear is max. More rear grip from bigger rear tyres. This makes you more aware of the lack of front end grip. The R34 has quite neutral steering and you are messing with this but you kind of do anyway when you increase the power.

That's generally true, but it also depends on where the face of the wheel sits. Often you will find front wheels will have the face sit out further for brake clearance. All things the same though (same wheel, same face position, same width), lower offset will mean more dish.

can i fit 18x9 with an offset of 30 on all four corners?

and can someone correct me if i'm wrong, but i believe the lower the offset, the more dish you have???

18 x 9 +30 would have the looks, but you'd definitely have to under tyre the front and/or roll your front guards :P

I currently run a 17 x 9 +20 all round on my R33 with only 235/45's and I have to roll all the guards, but as you can see I do have almost maximum dish ;)

RearBlackdished17.jpg

That's generally true, but it also depends on where the face of the wheel sits. Often you will find front wheels will have the face sit out further for brake clearance. All things the same though (same wheel, same face position, same width), lower offset will mean more dish.

Thats definitely true, as I have especially gone for a set of rims that were off a GTR or Z32 for maximum brake clearance or yo can custom order rims depending on application for extra $$$.

P6110093.jpg

phillb

how the hell did you fit +20 offset on your car?

Are R32's different offsets to R34?

With tender care :P Thats my car black four door, though I'm on the hunt for a guard roller as even with stretched rubber they do rub a little. IMO I think it just helps to improve the look of car as I've never been a fan of the sunken look!

From what I've read all GTR's from factory are:

R32 GTR = 16 x 8 +30

R33 GTR = 17 x 9 +30

R34 GTR = 18 x 9 +30

Though R33 and R34's do have apparently more guard space and can fit even lower than +30> and still have no problems with clearance..

I haven't ever tried my rims on a 34 I am sure you will have a similar situation to me and also have the same width all round you may find a small amount of tramlining if you have the same size tyres. though that can be cured with wheel alignment and or run 225/235 front and 235/255 rear depending on the style your after?

Cheers

Phill

Edited by phillb

this is beginning to gimme a headache

so much info on GTR's yet not that much info on the rwd variants :P

the standard R34 GTT come with 17x7.5 with a +35 offset i think...

GAHHH~~~

mayb i'll get 18x8.5 fronts with a +30 offset and rears 18x9 with +30 offset..

this is beginning to gimme a headache

so much info on GTR's yet not that much info on the rwd variants :P

the standard R34 GTT come with 17x7.5 with a +35 offset i think...

GAHHH~~~

mayb i'll get 18x8.5 fronts with a +30 offset and rears 18x9 with +30 offset..

And I think you'll be fine they should sit nice and flush and you shouldn't have any guard clearance issues.

If you want to see 9" wheels on a gt-t just pm me and you can test fit mine?

Ill give you the short answer..

18X9.5 rear with +38 offset ... Yes you could also run 37 or 39 but 38 is right on the guard with 9.5" rim

Fronts I run 18x8.5 with +32 offset .. Yes people like to pump it out more but I picked such a lower offset because the stones and crap fly up the side of my black paint work when u turn ..

Edited by DECIM8
Ill give you the short answer..

18X9.5 rear with +38 offset ... Yes you could also run 37 or 39 but 38 is right on the guard with 9.5" rim

Fronts I run 18x8.5 with +32 offset .. Yes people like to pump it out more but I picked such a lower offset because the stones and crap fly up the side of my black paint work when u turn ..

That would be pretty spot on. I ran 18x8.5 +30 and 18x9.5 +38 before and they were perfect. A bit of inner scrub on full lock on the drivers side inner plastic guard, I can live with tht...no rolling or lipping required.

Currently running 18x8.5 +35 and 18x9.5 +35 no guard mods needed.

  • 7 months later...

Hi guys just need some help while on this topic.

Ill looking at buying 18inch wheels with 18x8.5+43 Rears 235x40 & 18x8+41 Fronts 225x40.

Will these offset fit my R34 gtt?

Would it clear the brakes?

Thanks guys

Yeah i might need a hand as well. I have some drift teks, 17 x 9.5, not sure what offset they are. Ive been told they will sit pretty much flush with the guards on my 34 GT-T with no rubbing?

Edited by Damo_R34
  • 4 months later...
Guest TR34GT

Guys,

I remember reading a past issue of High Performance Imports magazine about 3 years ago, when they were helpfull enough to list the full range of original and possible fitments of R32, R33 and R34 cars including GT, GTR, GTST and GTT.

I can remember one thing about that article.

R33's can fit a whole lot more rubber under the guards, if the guards are in the original state.

They listed 18 x 8 front and 18 x 9 rear, as the best possible fitment to use.

I've used 18 x 8.5 front and 18 x 9.5 rear before with 265s (rear) on an anniversary R33 I used to own, and the tyres wore away part of the Bilstein shocks upper flange on both sides. (scary that I didn't notice till almost too late)

The R34's optimum setup was supposed to be 18 x 8 front and 18 x 8.5 rear.

225's and 245s fitted?

If the car's lowered, forget all of the above!

Jim (TR34GT)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...