Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well just got some more info, disconnected the wastegate pressure line. Car is free-boosting to 15psi (funnily enough what the actuator spring is set to) then boost tails off in much the same way.

ie must be the actuator....next question wtf can I do, what other option do I have for an internally gated turbo?????

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Keep on winding the actuator up more and then going for a test drive. And if you've got an ebc that supports rpm based boost control you could overshoot the boost level where boost starts to drop off i.e. instead of aiming for 15psi where boost drops, aim for 18psi, it might average off to 15psi.

New theory!!!!

For the actuator to be forced open, there needs to be some pressure up against it ie one side is a much higher pressure than the other side.

OK my dump pipe is 100% split, so the exhaust is about 2" in diamter and the dump has it's very own isolated 1" pipe....I'm thinking maybe the pressure across the actuator side is getting too high for the exhaust flow that the car is trying to push.

If I just threw a bellmouth dump pipe on I'd probably be better off as there is no chance of a pressure difference across the internal actuator as it's also seeing the pressure from the exhaust flow (unlike now as it meets way down the pipe where the exhaust pressure pretty low in comparison)

Feedback please :D

If I just threw a bellmouth dump pipe on I'd probably be better off as there is no chance of a pressure difference across the internal actuator as it's also seeing the pressure from the exhaust flow (unlike now as it meets way down the pipe where the exhaust pressure pretty low in comparison)

Feedback please :D

You maybe right about the dump pipe being to small. Back to back testing on a neo stagea with a hks gtrs, which would be similar size to your hiflow, a bell mouth dump got 7rwkw more top end over the split dump pipe. The tuners believed the difference was caused by the split dump being too small.

Pm AFRO, he has a spare R34 GTT bell mouth dump for sale, or he may lend it to you. He lives at Rochedale

You maybe right about the dump pipe being to small. Back to back testing on a neo stagea with a hks gtrs, which would be similar size to your hiflow, a bell mouth dump got 7rwkw more top end over the split dump pipe. The tuners believed the difference was caused by the split dump being to same.

Pm AFRO, he has a spare R34 GTT bell mouth dump for sale, or he may lend it to you. He lives at Rochedale

All over it like a fat kid on a smarty!

A CES HPC-coated stainless-steel split dump is coming to a "for sale" thread near you!!!!

A long time ago I made a split dump for my R33 and only 3-4mths later everybody was making one.However I regret not making a bellmouth as I truly believe they are better.So yesterday I removed the split and replaced with my own bellmouth.It will go in to the hitman next week for a tune so should be interesting to see the result.If seat of the pants are anything to go by I`m right ,the power is much better up top.Doesn`t seem as crisp down low but remember ,no tune yet.

I dont think a bellmouth will make any differance !!!my .02

Why not? It makes sense as the pipe running behind the actuator is at low pressure with respect to the exhaust side, that's the only way it can be pushed open.

Bell mouth will equalize the pressure as there is no difference accross it then.

Why not? It makes sense as the pipe running behind the actuator is at low pressure with respect to the exhaust side, that's the only way it can be pushed open.

Bell mouth will equalize the pressure as there is no difference accross it then.

By saying you are using a bell mouth dump pipe you are essentially implying that you want the wastegate and the turbine exhaust exits from the turbo to be contained within the same inlet chamber of the dump pipe, right? Unlike the split where there is the two seperate paths. If so without the split i think you may be right, as the difference 1" vs 2" diameter can (and i emphasise can) make is a good point. The single exhaust chamber in the combined dump pipe, will ensure the pressures are equal!!

Hope the change of dump pipe solves you problem, look forward to hearing the results.

By saying you are using a bell mouth dump pipe you are essentially implying that you want the wastegate and the turbine exhaust exits from the turbo to be contained within the same inlet chamber of the dump pipe, right? Unlike the split where there is the two seperate paths. If so without the split i think you may be right, as the difference 1" vs 2" diameter can (and i emphasise can) make is a good point. The single exhaust chamber in the combined dump pipe, will ensure the pressures are equal!!

Hope the change of dump pipe solves you problem, look forward to hearing the results.

Eactly dude, that's what I'm going with...see dodgy picture :D Equal pressure all the way! I think the split may be a good idea with a stock turbo, but my one is realy trying to push some serious gas out of it, the split just isn't working methinks.

post-1182-1185667836_thumb.jpg

Im a noob but will bet 1k on it that it doesnt help at all.

I have a bellmouth.

to hold 15 psi ur reversion may be anywhere in the flow path even inlet :P

dyno chart tells you u were fine at 10 psi ,maybe a leak after that?( i put clamps on all my hoses)things like orig boost guage may leak?

I could be wrong also :D

but ur right i dont like split dumps idea anyway but a split may have less presure on the exhaust side being seperate from the main exhaust presure?

u want less presure behind the flap and more pushing it open

like someone said bleed valves will taper off too if ur running dat

Im a noob but will bet 1k on it that it doesnt help at all.

I have a bellmouth.

to hold 15 psi ur reversion may be anywhere in the flow path even inlet :P

dyno chart tells you u were fine at 10 psi ,maybe a leak after that?( i put clamps on all my hoses)things like orig boost guage may leak?

I could be wrong also :D

but ur right i dont like split dumps idea anyway but a split may have less presure on the exhaust side being seperate from the main exhaust presure?

u want less presure behind the flap and more pushing it open

like someone said bleed valves will taper off too if ur running dat

Yeah but inlet restriction doesn't push open a free-boosting actuator, the pressure was enough to overcome the HKS actuator set at 15psi, currently I don't need to run any pressure lines to it to make it open...no boost control whatsoever.

$1000 would be nice :D

I was getting overboost and underboost mixed up :D

But im just trying to help!

****new theory!****

maybe at a certain point the exhaust where it meets the wastegate pipe will make the small wastegate pipe have vacuum!thus forcing the actuaotr flap open more than you want at high gas speeds....thus bleeding your boost off

how big is dump pipe it only looks 2 1/4 inch?or so..

but i still think split dump is not the prob :P

Eactly dude, that's what I'm going with...see dodgy picture :D Equal pressure all the way! I think the split may be a good idea with a stock turbo, but my one is realy trying to push some serious gas out of it, the split just isn't working methinks.

post-1182-1185667836_thumb.jpg

the bellmouth might make a difference but if i follow what you're saying correctly, i don't think it will make it for the reasons you're suggesting. remember the whole reason we use splits to keep the w/g and exh seperate is so the w/g flow does not impede the exh flow. there is no turbo system that i'm aware of that uses pressure from the exh to keep the w/g closed. this would also suggest that when you are at wot the w/g operation woud be compromised by the exh gas flow by not letting it open.

the w/g is controlled by the actuator. the preload might be too low and be allowing some creep or there might be another issue with the intake side, but i guess you've checked thoroughly for obstructions etc? it would be unlike CES to make something that's not functional, unless the gas you're pushing through the hi flow is exceeding the capacity of the exhaust but they seem to be switched onto that sort of thing. also have you enlarged the wastegate orifice? can't speak from experience on this one but apparently some turbos with hi flow etc will exceed the capacity of the standard size wastegate.

good luck, intersted to hear how you get on

just saw your post re no w/g lines needed to make it open - now i reckon definately check out that actuator.

Edited by Scooby

Yeah that's why it may be easier just to go to the bellmouth, equalize the exhaust and wastegate side and be done with it.....you really don't know how close I am to getting an EVO lol!!!!

A greater spring tension is just going to see me pushing more boost than I want to with the current gearbox....aghghg why can't things be simple!!!!

Yeah I went down to CES for a chat about it all. But maybe that's the issue, the setup is awesome for a fairly stock turbo, but once you get the exhaust pressures moving it's enough of a pressure difference to open the wastegate...we're only talking 15psi of load which in the scheme of things isn't much when you consider the pressure at the turbine.

I'll put a bellmouth on, then we can reconvine and discuss :D

Just so you know I have no problems with power or holding boost.The only reason I changed the split pipe to bellmouth is as an experiment because I`m a hopeless fiddler.But think about it,when the wastegate opens the only time the gases are not going in the same direction is when the flap STARTS to open.Thats when the gases are going sideways but only till the flap opens further then all gases are going in the same direction.Plus the Fact that the standard or high flow turbo is quite small in the turbine outlet area,putting a restriction in the way via a divider is causing more problems than it solves.Gas wants to expand when it is hot so why would you stop it by keeping it in a 2" pipe? Don`t forget,the wastegate opens after boost has been reached so the turbine will boost faster with less restriction via a bellmouth.Realistically,the turbine dump pipe on a high flow should be a 4" pipe to ,say,the rear side of the cat.Now that would be efficient at 20lbs of boost.

I remember a published experiment years ago involving a V8 holden and going from twin pipes to a single.The single gained some 15kws due to all the gases in the same pipe speeding up the gas flow.Just a thought. :yes::blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...