Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well just got some more info, disconnected the wastegate pressure line. Car is free-boosting to 15psi (funnily enough what the actuator spring is set to) then boost tails off in much the same way.

ie must be the actuator....next question wtf can I do, what other option do I have for an internally gated turbo?????

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Keep on winding the actuator up more and then going for a test drive. And if you've got an ebc that supports rpm based boost control you could overshoot the boost level where boost starts to drop off i.e. instead of aiming for 15psi where boost drops, aim for 18psi, it might average off to 15psi.

New theory!!!!

For the actuator to be forced open, there needs to be some pressure up against it ie one side is a much higher pressure than the other side.

OK my dump pipe is 100% split, so the exhaust is about 2" in diamter and the dump has it's very own isolated 1" pipe....I'm thinking maybe the pressure across the actuator side is getting too high for the exhaust flow that the car is trying to push.

If I just threw a bellmouth dump pipe on I'd probably be better off as there is no chance of a pressure difference across the internal actuator as it's also seeing the pressure from the exhaust flow (unlike now as it meets way down the pipe where the exhaust pressure pretty low in comparison)

Feedback please :D

If I just threw a bellmouth dump pipe on I'd probably be better off as there is no chance of a pressure difference across the internal actuator as it's also seeing the pressure from the exhaust flow (unlike now as it meets way down the pipe where the exhaust pressure pretty low in comparison)

Feedback please :D

You maybe right about the dump pipe being to small. Back to back testing on a neo stagea with a hks gtrs, which would be similar size to your hiflow, a bell mouth dump got 7rwkw more top end over the split dump pipe. The tuners believed the difference was caused by the split dump being too small.

Pm AFRO, he has a spare R34 GTT bell mouth dump for sale, or he may lend it to you. He lives at Rochedale

You maybe right about the dump pipe being to small. Back to back testing on a neo stagea with a hks gtrs, which would be similar size to your hiflow, a bell mouth dump got 7rwkw more top end over the split dump pipe. The tuners believed the difference was caused by the split dump being to same.

Pm AFRO, he has a spare R34 GTT bell mouth dump for sale, or he may lend it to you. He lives at Rochedale

All over it like a fat kid on a smarty!

A CES HPC-coated stainless-steel split dump is coming to a "for sale" thread near you!!!!

A long time ago I made a split dump for my R33 and only 3-4mths later everybody was making one.However I regret not making a bellmouth as I truly believe they are better.So yesterday I removed the split and replaced with my own bellmouth.It will go in to the hitman next week for a tune so should be interesting to see the result.If seat of the pants are anything to go by I`m right ,the power is much better up top.Doesn`t seem as crisp down low but remember ,no tune yet.

I dont think a bellmouth will make any differance !!!my .02

Why not? It makes sense as the pipe running behind the actuator is at low pressure with respect to the exhaust side, that's the only way it can be pushed open.

Bell mouth will equalize the pressure as there is no difference accross it then.

Why not? It makes sense as the pipe running behind the actuator is at low pressure with respect to the exhaust side, that's the only way it can be pushed open.

Bell mouth will equalize the pressure as there is no difference accross it then.

By saying you are using a bell mouth dump pipe you are essentially implying that you want the wastegate and the turbine exhaust exits from the turbo to be contained within the same inlet chamber of the dump pipe, right? Unlike the split where there is the two seperate paths. If so without the split i think you may be right, as the difference 1" vs 2" diameter can (and i emphasise can) make is a good point. The single exhaust chamber in the combined dump pipe, will ensure the pressures are equal!!

Hope the change of dump pipe solves you problem, look forward to hearing the results.

By saying you are using a bell mouth dump pipe you are essentially implying that you want the wastegate and the turbine exhaust exits from the turbo to be contained within the same inlet chamber of the dump pipe, right? Unlike the split where there is the two seperate paths. If so without the split i think you may be right, as the difference 1" vs 2" diameter can (and i emphasise can) make is a good point. The single exhaust chamber in the combined dump pipe, will ensure the pressures are equal!!

Hope the change of dump pipe solves you problem, look forward to hearing the results.

Eactly dude, that's what I'm going with...see dodgy picture :D Equal pressure all the way! I think the split may be a good idea with a stock turbo, but my one is realy trying to push some serious gas out of it, the split just isn't working methinks.

post-1182-1185667836_thumb.jpg

Im a noob but will bet 1k on it that it doesnt help at all.

I have a bellmouth.

to hold 15 psi ur reversion may be anywhere in the flow path even inlet :P

dyno chart tells you u were fine at 10 psi ,maybe a leak after that?( i put clamps on all my hoses)things like orig boost guage may leak?

I could be wrong also :D

but ur right i dont like split dumps idea anyway but a split may have less presure on the exhaust side being seperate from the main exhaust presure?

u want less presure behind the flap and more pushing it open

like someone said bleed valves will taper off too if ur running dat

Im a noob but will bet 1k on it that it doesnt help at all.

I have a bellmouth.

to hold 15 psi ur reversion may be anywhere in the flow path even inlet :P

dyno chart tells you u were fine at 10 psi ,maybe a leak after that?( i put clamps on all my hoses)things like orig boost guage may leak?

I could be wrong also :D

but ur right i dont like split dumps idea anyway but a split may have less presure on the exhaust side being seperate from the main exhaust presure?

u want less presure behind the flap and more pushing it open

like someone said bleed valves will taper off too if ur running dat

Yeah but inlet restriction doesn't push open a free-boosting actuator, the pressure was enough to overcome the HKS actuator set at 15psi, currently I don't need to run any pressure lines to it to make it open...no boost control whatsoever.

$1000 would be nice :D

I was getting overboost and underboost mixed up :D

But im just trying to help!

****new theory!****

maybe at a certain point the exhaust where it meets the wastegate pipe will make the small wastegate pipe have vacuum!thus forcing the actuaotr flap open more than you want at high gas speeds....thus bleeding your boost off

how big is dump pipe it only looks 2 1/4 inch?or so..

but i still think split dump is not the prob :P

Eactly dude, that's what I'm going with...see dodgy picture :D Equal pressure all the way! I think the split may be a good idea with a stock turbo, but my one is realy trying to push some serious gas out of it, the split just isn't working methinks.

post-1182-1185667836_thumb.jpg

the bellmouth might make a difference but if i follow what you're saying correctly, i don't think it will make it for the reasons you're suggesting. remember the whole reason we use splits to keep the w/g and exh seperate is so the w/g flow does not impede the exh flow. there is no turbo system that i'm aware of that uses pressure from the exh to keep the w/g closed. this would also suggest that when you are at wot the w/g operation woud be compromised by the exh gas flow by not letting it open.

the w/g is controlled by the actuator. the preload might be too low and be allowing some creep or there might be another issue with the intake side, but i guess you've checked thoroughly for obstructions etc? it would be unlike CES to make something that's not functional, unless the gas you're pushing through the hi flow is exceeding the capacity of the exhaust but they seem to be switched onto that sort of thing. also have you enlarged the wastegate orifice? can't speak from experience on this one but apparently some turbos with hi flow etc will exceed the capacity of the standard size wastegate.

good luck, intersted to hear how you get on

just saw your post re no w/g lines needed to make it open - now i reckon definately check out that actuator.

Edited by Scooby

Yeah that's why it may be easier just to go to the bellmouth, equalize the exhaust and wastegate side and be done with it.....you really don't know how close I am to getting an EVO lol!!!!

A greater spring tension is just going to see me pushing more boost than I want to with the current gearbox....aghghg why can't things be simple!!!!

Yeah I went down to CES for a chat about it all. But maybe that's the issue, the setup is awesome for a fairly stock turbo, but once you get the exhaust pressures moving it's enough of a pressure difference to open the wastegate...we're only talking 15psi of load which in the scheme of things isn't much when you consider the pressure at the turbine.

I'll put a bellmouth on, then we can reconvine and discuss :D

Just so you know I have no problems with power or holding boost.The only reason I changed the split pipe to bellmouth is as an experiment because I`m a hopeless fiddler.But think about it,when the wastegate opens the only time the gases are not going in the same direction is when the flap STARTS to open.Thats when the gases are going sideways but only till the flap opens further then all gases are going in the same direction.Plus the Fact that the standard or high flow turbo is quite small in the turbine outlet area,putting a restriction in the way via a divider is causing more problems than it solves.Gas wants to expand when it is hot so why would you stop it by keeping it in a 2" pipe? Don`t forget,the wastegate opens after boost has been reached so the turbine will boost faster with less restriction via a bellmouth.Realistically,the turbine dump pipe on a high flow should be a 4" pipe to ,say,the rear side of the cat.Now that would be efficient at 20lbs of boost.

I remember a published experiment years ago involving a V8 holden and going from twin pipes to a single.The single gained some 15kws due to all the gases in the same pipe speeding up the gas flow.Just a thought. :yes::blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...