Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well probably the most least looked at thing on alot of peoples cars are the wheels alignment. A good wheel alignment can completely change the feel of your car and make it handle twice as good. Just wondering if anyone here who seriously does suspension work and knows a bit about wheel alignments if you could please post a copy of your spec sheet or even just post it. Mainly for people with r32s

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180345-wheel-alignments/
Share on other sites

A wheel alignment (especially camber) will depend on the amount of antiroll (low speed bump, swaybars, spring rates and roll couple), tyres being run etc. It's hard to suggest an alignment without knowing the full details of the setup.

Well my car has adjustable rose joint rear lower control arms, adjustable rosejoint cusco camber arms, adjustable rosejoint traction rods and hicas lock bar, Tein HA coilovers and adjustable sway bars front and rear. Soon to be cusco castor rods, still dont know what kind of upper camber for front to get.. was thinking cusco but i cant find any for gtst only gtr. Also be getting new tie rods... also do not know what brand yet.

also has a mini spool diff

Edited by choku_dori

i got 8kg front and 6kg rear springs... i run coilovers on around 6-8 clicks out of 16 for damper.

Sway bars i cant remember sizes but its fattest front whiteline has and second fattest rear, both adjustable.

Tyres are 235/40/r18 rear and 215/35/r18 front

Application is street and some drift

Anyhelp would be really good cause my local tyre shops have no idea about how to align a cars wheels for handling etc... only for keeping my car in a straight line when i let go of steering wheel :)

Try this

Front:

Camber: -2deg

Castor: 8deg

Toe: 2mm out total

If you do a fair bit of street driving, go with less toe out as it will kill the inside of your tyres, something like 1mm or even 0 toe.

Rear:

Camber: -0.5deg

Toe: 2mm in total

Toe is how far the wheel is tilted on the front, toe in on both sides of the car causes the wheels to push towards center, this gives a straighter line as the car moves around less. toe out is the opposite, it makes the wheels pull off center but also tends to make it easier to turn on the fronts as the inner wheel will pull more then the outer and can help reduce understeer if done right.

well...basically toe out makes the car unstable, and toe inmakes it stable. Toe in also reduces the wear on tyres from excessive camber because it drags more of the tyre across the road. When you get a road style wheel alignment, the more camber you have, the more toe in they run.

But, for track use it is critical.

Front to out improves turn in to corners - the inside tyre is pointing where you are about to steer to help you out. Too much toe out at the front results in understeer though.

Rear toe out causes the rear to be "unstable" in corners. For drifting I think people like this, it encourages the tail to get out initially, but might make it harder to control once it is out. For racing most people don't like toe out, you end up sliding into corners. Personally I don't mind some steering from the rear on some tracks (like wakefield) but I think that is very much up to your driving style.

Anyway, enough dribbling....I run 0-1mm toe out at the back and 1-2mm toe out at the front for track use.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...