Jump to content
SAU Community

Is Pauly33GTS-t Sig Too Big  

25 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Now don't take offense to this paully i'm trying to be tactful but i think your signature is too large and falls outside of SAU's signature guidelines of

now i don't want this to turn into a slinging fest of harassment but keep comments clean and posative

# Combined Text and Image signatures to be kept within 600x200 pixels

# Keep text to within the above dimensions

while im @ work its a full pg up or dwn to just get through your signature

post-13315-1186993599_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180672-is-pauly-sig-too-big/
Share on other sites

it dont look so big on my screen at all and im running 1600x900...

The whole point in complaining about a big sig is that it takes a long time to load, but since madaz is being such a big freakin girl about it. I'll change it for the good of the 15 inch LCD hes running SAU on in 640x480 rez.

If you had a problem about it, come to me next time. stop being a bitch honestly. I expect an apology.

-Pauly. (NOTE THE SINGLE "L" IN "PAULY" ASWELL)

post-32965-1187004855_thumb.jpg

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t

yes see, mines all text, but ill change it anyway cause as I said, no one told me about it...

talk about ratting someone out in a different context...

its not like my sig or avatar takes 45 minutes to load on 56k ull find it shows up pretty much in under 0.2ms.

Madaz you right... but you know since ur going down this path.

Your signiature falls outside SAU's limits of 600x200 by being 478 x 275 big.

So. Im changing mine to be within the guidelines, but if the hypocrit that started this thread can also be f**ked, he should change his too.

I think this crap should be locked, and cubes can you edit the title to have "Pauly" spelt correctly. thanks.

I voted for "my cats name is mittens".

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t

Your 100% correct Pauly i didn't start this thread thinking i was above the signature guidelines I've never had anyone complain about my sig.. as yet and am more than happy to review and make necessary changes as seen fit.

and for the most part most people here adhere pretty close to the guidelines but come on man show a little respect

for those interested the screen shot was taken on server 2003 its a 800x600 terminal

your signature is still rather large but its a vast improvement even Pete (ax53b70p25) has done more mods to his car and fits it in a nice compact blurb if you wish to read it

for all those concerned about there sigs im not the sig natzi many of you know i make allot of the sigs you see in the Adelaide section i even made a befitting one for Pauly to which i understand if he doesn't wish to use it

you mean the one that told me to screw his sister as a retort?

Yes id love to spend my time reading his signiature since following by his examples would be worth my while.

You made a stupid signiature for me which i did not wish to use and if you did the right thing we wouldnt be in this predicament.

I'm willing to forgive all and forget but i think that you want to keep going on as some sort of mascarade of bullshit.

now /quit rage please.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...