Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

get a 460ohm resistor cut the positive side of the led the longer leg trim the resistor solder it on wrap the diode legs around that white plastic plug thing the same as the original bulbs and youre done plug it in if it dont light up turn 180degre and bobs your aunty :cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183041-ac-led-buttons/#findComment-3322240
Share on other sites

here are the pics...

left is the original bulb, middle is LED, right is chopped LED

post-29088-1188736992_thumb.jpg

here is when the LED in the holder.. the holder has been chopped (modified) a bit .. to fit the LED

post-29088-1188737241_thumb.jpg

post-29088-1188737291_thumb.jpg

post-29088-1188737334_thumb.jpg

no resistor was used..

yes there is in the blue cover ont the led obviously dan666 gets em made up wid the resistor already on

P.s if a LED does not have the correct resistor it will burn out coz they run on 3.3 to 3.2v so the resistor converts 12vdc to 3.3 or 3.2v if you know what i mean hey!!

so you really dont know what your talking about!! see the 1st pic look close see the shrink wrap in the blue t5 wedge thats the resistor there i thinkwraped in black shrink wrap correct me if im wrong plz :D

Edited by R334door(s2)
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183041-ac-led-buttons/#findComment-3323706
Share on other sites

i mean... in the link posted above.. you're required to solder a resistor on the LED.. these LED doesn't require you to solder any resistor on.. i think you're misunderstanding the question.. or maybe its me.. misreading it.

easy ask 666dan if there are aNY RESISTORS IN THE T5 WEDGE BULB 4 THE a/C BUTTONS

THERE IS LIKE 3 OR 4 LEDSD IN THE BLUE CASE DUKI PLZ FIND MORE INFO ON IT WHEN YOU DONT KNOE HOW DUMB R U

Edited by R334door(s2)
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183041-ac-led-buttons/#findComment-3324042
Share on other sites

omg ... something is wrong with your head..

i know that a resistor is required.. I am saying that no extra resistor are required to be soldered on..

eg.. this link as posted above.. r33 LED

you know what.. I'm not gonna bother arguing with you.. as i definitely knows what you're trying to say..

he bought the same LED off 666DAN like me.. and all he wanted to know was if his required to solder extra resistor on.. but 666DAN has made it easy.. so his not required to..

i just posted some pics up so its better to understand what i did.. that is all.

Edited by ducki
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183041-ac-led-buttons/#findComment-3324535
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...