Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guys this car has absolutely everything done to it with very very low genuine kms, near new engine, compared to other cars its a steal for the power and the mods im open to offers need this car gone hint hint.....

OMFG I can't believe there hasn't been more interest on this bad boy!!

Look guys this car is fantastic, looks great and goes like the clappers! I'm sure Dan has paperwork for the engine build and everything else he has bought for it just recently!! as stated before the car has everything done and ready to roll.........

SO BUY IT.......LOL

thanks daz hopefully someone comes to there sense soon, theres been cars with similar power outputs for same money but they either dont have a freshly rebuilt motor or they look stock as and have more kms.

Mate ...I would buy it in a heartbeat!

I'm all cashed up too ...but I'm in Perth WA ...and I'm wondering if I'll EVER get this baby through the pits here!!!?????

What do you reckon to my chances? ...have you got any engineering certs for the work done?

This is my first foray into Jap Imports after being a Ford man for years ...man, I LOVE this car!

Can you post up any more pics of the boot and engine bay?

ANY ADVICE ON MY CHANCES OF CLEARING PIT INSPECTION AND REGO HERE IN WA WOULD BE MUCH APPRECIATED GUYS!!!!!!

Call me on 0404 701 035 mate.

Cheers, MARK

Hey mate,

I have no idea i have enquired for qld and all i would have to do is plumb back the screamer which is a 2 min job. It all depends if they look at mods ask in the wa section. If its just the usual brakes, lights etc etc it will pass no worries at all. I dont have engineering certs for it, but in saying that all work has been professionally done and is neat at as. Just have a look at the angine bay below. I will get some pics of the boot for you tonight, basically just a 2 12" subs takes up the boot. I have no worries at all with helping out with shipping ie dropping at a transport yard etc.

CIMG1685.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...